City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Notes

Notes

Date	Text
2016-08-18 11:38:17	**CORRECTIONS**

	SAMANTHA HILL
	BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
	[email protected]
	561-805-6724

	1. TWO SETS OF THE ROOF PLAN WERE SUBMITTED. THREE
	COMPLETE SETS REQUIRED, FBC 107.

	2. TWO SETS OF THE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL AND
	ENGINEERING WERE SUBMITTED; THREE REQUIRED, FBC 107.

	3. THE ENGINEERING FOR THE ROOF TILE ATTACHMENT IS A
	PHOTOCOPY. FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND
	SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED
	DATED ORIGINALS.

	4. SEE PRIOR CORRECTION LISTS. IF A REVIEW LETTER IS
	SUBMITTED IN LIEU OF AN INTIALED/DATED SHOP DRAWING
	REVIEW STAMP DIRECTLY ON THE SUBMITTAL, THE LETTER IS
	TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED (PER BUILDING OFFICIAL), FBC
	107.

	5. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY THE DESIGNER
	OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, FBC 107 (ROOF HATCH
	PRODUCT APPROVAL).

	6. THE ROOF HATCH PRODUCT APPROVAL IS ILLEGIBLE DUE TO
	THE SIZE. THE DRAWING SHEETS WERE PRINTED HALF SIZE
	(PORTRAIT ORIENTATION RATHER THAN LANDSCAPE). THIS
	DOCUMENT IS USED FOR PLAN REVIEW, INSPECTIONS, AND
	RETAINED AS A PART OF THE PERMIT RECORD FOREVER. A
	CLEAR LEGIBLE COPY IS REQUIRED, FBC 107.

	7. THE BASE SHEET CALCULATIONS ARE A PHOTOCOPY.
	DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR
	PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED DATED ORIGINALS,
	FS471.