| Date |
Text |
| 2016-08-22 11:32:06 | FAILED |
| | |
| | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. PLEASE NOTE THAT CONTRARY TO |
| | WHAT IS STATED ON THE PLAN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL FORM, |
| | THERE WAS NO COVER LETTER RESPONDING TO THE AUGUST 12 |
| | COMMENTS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 1) THANK YOU FOR SUBMITTING THE REVISED ARCHITECTURAL |
| | SITE PLAN WHICH CORRECTLY SHOWS THE CURRENT AND FUTURE |
| | LAYOUT OF THE ENTIRE WESTERN PARKING AREA. THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THIS PERMIT NOW |
| | INCORRECTLY SHOWS THE WESTERN PARKING AREA LAYOUT. ALL |
| | SUBMITTED PLANS SHALL SHOW THE SAME APPROVED, ACCURATE |
| | CONDITIONS. NOTE: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS NOT REQUIRED AS |
| | PART OF THE FENCE PERMIT AND IT MAY BE APPROPRIATE TO |
| | REMOVE IT AS IS SHOWS CONFLICTING INFORMATION WITH THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2) AMENDED COMMENT: RESOLUTION NO. 379-10 GOVERNS THE |
| | LIMITED STREET CLOSURE OF COCOANUT AND TUXEDO LANES TO |
| | INCLUDE THE TIMES THE CLOSURE IS PERMITTED, THE GATE |
| | PLACEMENT AND PUBLIC ACCESS. |
| | A. SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 379-10 REQUIRES THAT |
| | TUXEDO LANE AND COCOANUT LANE REMAIN OPEN TO PEDESTRIAN |
| | AND BICYCLE TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. THE CURRENT GATE |
| | LOCATIONS ALLOW PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS TO GO AROUND |
| | THE GATES AND THUS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE |
| | RESUBMITTED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE WESTERN GATE ON TUXEDO LANE, BUT RATHER |
| | JUST A NOTE IS PROVIDED. THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THE GATE |
| | AND THAT LOCATION, TO INCLUDE SWING POSITION WITH OPEN |
| | MEETS THE SECTION 3 REQUIREMENT. BLOW UP DETAILS AT THE |
| | GATES WOULD BE HELPFUL. |
| | |
| | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN |
| | REFERENCES NEW GATES AND FENCING ON SHEET AS2.1. NO |
| | SHEET EXISTS. IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE SHEET G2.5? STAFF |
| | WILL REVIEW IF G2.5 IS THE CORRECT SHEET. HOWEVER, |
| | SHEET G1.2 SHALL BE CORRECTED TO LIST THE CORRECT |
| | REFERENCE SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 4) AMENDED COMMENT: IF FENCE C AND GATE C2 ARE NOT TO |
| | BE CONSTRUCTION FENCES, THEN THEY MAY HAVE NO SCREENING |
| | MATERIAL ON THEM. THIS COMMENT IS REPEATED DUE TO THE |
| | NOTE STATING "1X1 FABRIC COLOR T.B.D." LISTED ON THE |
| | PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY NOTE. NOTE: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | PROVIDED CALLS THEM OUT AS CONSTRUCTION FENCES. |
| | |
| | 5) FENCES A AND D, GATE A AT COCOANUT LANE, AND GATE A1 |
| | MEET ZONING REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 6) WHY DOES THE FENCE AT THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE FIELD |
| | WRAP AROUND THE TREES? IT WOULD SEEM THAT THE FENCE |
| | SHOULD RUN STRAIGHT NORTH/SOUTH WITH THE TREES ON THE |
| | OUTSIDE OF THE FENCE. EITHER WAY COMPLIES WITH CODE. |
| | |
| | 7) THE PBDA PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF |
| | FINAL 104 INSPECTION APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | |
| 2016-08-16 14:01:42 | ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER |
