| Date |
Text |
| 2016-08-18 06:46:46 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 5TH EDITION |
| | |
| | |
| | PHOTOGRAPHS WERE PROVIDED. REVISE PLAN TO INCORPORATE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST, NOT ADDRESSED: |
| | |
| | 1. REVISE THE PLAN TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING |
| | INFORMATION: |
| | |
| | LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES |
| | LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ACCESS AISLES |
| | SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM PUBLIC WAY |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM ACCESSIBLE SPACE TO ACCESSIBLE |
| | ENTRANCE |
| | |
| | THE PLAN PROVIDED DEPICTS SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES, TWO |
| | ACCESS AISLES, AND STATES THAT THERE ARE FIVE |
| | ACCESSIBLE SPACES. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW MANY ARE |
| | PROPOSED. THE PLAN IS NOT CLEAR AS TO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER THERE IS A SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF |
| | BOTH ACCESS AISLES, OR IF THIS IS A LANDSCAPE ISLAND. |
| | IF THIS IS A SIDEWALK, WIDTH IS NOT SHOWN. |
| | |
| | THE DESIGN APPEARS TO COMPEL OCCUPANTS TO TRAVEL BEHIND |
| | PARKED CARS (NOT PERMITTED). (2ND REVIEW, REVISE PLAN |
| | TO SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE.) |
| | |
| | NO ACCESSIBLE PARKING IS SHOWN SERVING THE SIX STORY. |
| | PARKING IS TO BE DISPERSED WHEN SERVING MULTIPLE |
| | ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES. DOES THE SIX STORY HAVE |
| | ENTRANCES? (2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED, SAME PLAN |
| | SUBMITTED) |
| | |
| | ACCESSIBLE SPACES ARE SHOWN IN COLOR. PLANS ARE SCANNED |
| | AND RETAINED IN BLACK AND WHITE. REVISE THE PLAN TO |
| | SHOW ALL PERTINENT INFORMATION GRAPHICALLY RATHER THAN |
| | USING HIGHLIGHTER/COLOR, FBC 107. (2ND REVIEW, SAME |
| | PLAN SUBMITTED, REVISE) |
| | |
| | SEE FBC 5TH EDITION ACCESSIBLITY 202.3 (ALTERATIONS), |
| | 208.2 (PARKING SPACES), 502 (PARKING SPACES), 206 |
| | (ACCESSIBLE ROUTE). |
| | |
| | YOU MAY FIND THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT USEFUL, |
| | PARTICULARLY THE INTRODUCTION: "WHEN A BUSINESS |
| | RESTRIPES A PARKING LOT, IT MUST PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING SPACES AS REQUIRED BY THE ADA STANDARDS FOR |
| | ACCESSIBLE DESIGN." |
| | |
| | HTTP://WWW.ADA.GOV/RESTRIPE.HTM |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PLAN STATES THAT RESTRIPE WILL BE DONE THE |
| | SAME AS EXISTING. IT APPEARS THAT "EXISTING" MAY HAVE |
| | BEEN DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT. I WAS UNABLE TO FIND A |
| | RECENT RESTRIPE PERMIT FOR THIS PROPERTY. THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION IN 2013 WAS DENIED WITH THE SAME COMMENTS |
| | AS THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | SEE REFERENCED DOCUMENT. A RESTRIPE IS CONSIDERED "NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION" BY ADA. A NON COMPLIANT INSTALLATION IS |
| | NOT PERMITTED TO BE REINSTALLED AS "EXISTING". AN |
| | INSTALLATION DONE WITHOUT A PERMIT IS NOT CONSIDERED |
| | "EXISTING." PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO PROVIDE REQUESTED |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 2. FBC 2014 ACCESSIBILITY ADVISORY 502.3, WHERE THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE MUST CROSS VEHICULAR TRAFFIC LANES, |
| | MARKED CROSSINGS ENHANCE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY; PLEASE |
| | INDICATE LOCATION ON PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3. THE INDIVIDUAL TAKING RESPONSIBILITY SHALL PROVIDE |
| | THEIR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE ON THE PLAN, FBC 107. |
| | |
| | NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO PERFORM A |
| | COMPLETE REVIEW. |
