| Date |
Text |
| 2017-02-09 15:19:19 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATIONS FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 1- A) ENGINEER TO PAY FOUR TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW FEES |
| | AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) FOR |
| | MULTIPLE FAILURES TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE ONE HOUR FIRE |
| | RATED WALL ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) NEED 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE WALL WITH EXPOSURE ON |
| | BOTH SIDES OF THE WEST SIDE WALL. REVISE PLANS AS |
| | REQUIRED. PROVIDE FIRE RATED WALL DETAIL AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. ENGINEER OF RECORD NEEDS TO PROVIDE A |
| | COMPLETE WALL ASSEMBLY DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS INSUFFICIENT. IT DOESN'T |
| | SPECIFY A COMPLETE ASSEMBLY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE WALL. |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS (TYPE, |
| | THICKNESS OF MATERIALS, ETC) ON EACH SIDE OF THE WALL. |
| | NOTE: UL 263 IS AN STANDARD TEST METHOD NOT FIRE RATED |
| | ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | 2- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL L DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SINCE |
| | THERE WAS NO RESPONSE AFTER SEVERAL REQUESTS, THE |
| | VALUATION WAS ESTIMATED TO BE $30,000 +/-. THE PERMIT |
| | FEE IS $858.56. |
| | |
| | 3- THE ATTACHMENT OF THE BARN DOORS SHOWN NORTH |
| | ELEVATION IS NOT CLEAR AND NEEDS MORE INFORMATION: A) |
| | THERE ARE NO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE NUMBER AND LOCATION |
| | OF FASTENERS. B) THE SCREW SIZE #8 X 1-5/8" SPECIFIED |
| | MAY NOT BE ADEQUATE. THE LENGTH OF THIS SCREW MAY JUST |
| | BE ENOUGH TO FASTEN TO THE STUCCO INSTEAD OF THE |
| | FRAMING MEMBERS. C) CLEARLY SPECIFY HOW ARE THESE DOORS |
| | ATTACHED TO THE STRUCTURE FRAMING MEMBERS. D) SPECIFY |
| | HOW ARE THE BARN DOORS SCREWED TOGETHER. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 4- SITE PLAN ON SHEET S1 SPECIFIES 3'-0" SETBACK ON THE |
| | WEST SIDE. THIS IS INCORRECT. SEE SURVEY AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5- WINDOW SHOWN ON THE EAST ELEVATION IS LOCATED IN THE |
| | END ZONE, NOT INTERIOR ZONE. IT SHOULD BE NOTED AS "B" |
| | NOT "A". REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION. |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
