| Date |
Text |
| 2016-07-06 16:59:41 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET LS 1 - AN F 1 OCCUPANCY IS INDICATED; HOWEVER, |
| | THERE IS NO F 1 IN THE REFERENCED FLORIDA LIFE SAFETY |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | THIS PROPOSED PROJECT FALLS UNDER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 40 |
| | INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THOSE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE IDENTIFY THE CLASSIFICATION OF CONTENTS PER |
| | SECTION 40.1.2 CLASSIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY. |
| | CLASSIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | 6.1.12. |
| | 40.1.2.1 SUBCLASSIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY. EACH |
| | INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCY SHALL BE SUBCLASSIFIED ACCORDING |
| | TO ITS USE AS DESCRIBED IN 40.1.2.1.1, 40.1.2.1.2, AND |
| | 40.1.2.1.3. 40.1.2.1.1 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCY. |
| | GENERAL INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES SHALL INCLUDE ALL OF THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES THAT CONDUCT ORDINARY AND |
| | LOW HAZARD INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS IN BUILDINGS OF |
| | CONVENTIONAL DESIGN THAT ARE USABLE FOR VARIOUS TYPES |
| | OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES |
| | (2) INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES THAT INCLUDE MULTISTORY |
| | BUILDINGS WHERE FLOORS ARE OCCUPIED BY DIFFERENT |
| | TENANTS, OR BUILDINGS THAT ARE USABLE FOR SUCH |
| | OCCUPANCY AND, THEREFORE, ARE SUBJECT TO POSSIBLE USE |
| | FOR TYPES OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES WITH A HIGH DENSITY |
| | OF EMPLOYEE POPULATION |
| | 40.1.2.1.2 SPECIAL-PURPOSE INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCY. |
| | SPECIALPURPOSE INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES SHALL INCLUDE ALL |
| | OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES THAT CONDUCT ORDINARY AND |
| | LOW HAZARD INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS IN BUILDINGS DESIGNED |
| | FOR, AND THAT ARE USABLE ONLY FOR, PARTICULAR TYPES OF |
| | OPERATIONS |
| | (2) INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES THAT ARE CHARACTERIZED BY A |
| | RELATIVELY LOW DENSITY OF EMPLOYEE POPULATION, WITH |
| | MUCH OF THE AREA OCCUPIED BY MACHINERY OR EQUIPMENT |
| | 40.1.2.1.3* HIGH HAZARD INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCY. HIGH |
| | HAZARD INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES SHALL INCLUDE ALL OF THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES THAT CONDUCT INDUSTRIAL |
| | OPERATIONS THAT USE HIGH HAZARD MATERIALS OR PROCESSES |
| | OR HOUSE HIGH HAZARD CONTENTS |
| | (2) INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES IN WHICH INCIDENTAL HIGH |
| | HAZARD OPERATIONS IN LOW OR ORDINARY HAZARD OCCUPANCIES |
| | THAT ARE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8.7 AND |
| | 40.3.2 ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE THE BASIS FOR OVERALL |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK OR |
| | PRODUCT AND WHAT SUBCLASSIFICATION IS PROPOSED TO |
| | COMPLY WITH. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET LS 1 - UNDER THE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS |
| | IT'S INDCATING A 75' MAXIMUN COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 40, TABLE 40.2.5 THE MAXIMUM |
| | COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL IS INDCATED AS 50' |
| | |
| | PLEASE CORRECT OR CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET LS 1 - TRAVEL DISTANCE TO AN EXIT ON THE 1ST |
| | FLOOR IS INDICATED AS 52'.9". PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 40, |
| | TABLE 40.2.5 INDICATES IT CAN NOT EXCEED 50" |
| | |
| | PLEASE CORRECT OR CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET LS 1 - A VERTICAL OPENING STAIRWAY IS |
| | INDICATED ON THE PLAN. PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 40, 40.3.1 |
| | PROTECTION OF VERTICAL OPENINGS. ANY VERTICAL OPENING |
| | SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8.6, |
| | UNLESS OTHERWISE |
| | PERMITTED BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) IN SPECIAL-PURPOSE INDUSTRIAL AND HIGH HAZARD |
| | INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCIES WHERE UNPROTECTED VERTICAL |
| | OPENINGS EXIST AND ARE NECESSARY TO MANUFACTURING |
| | OPERATIONS, SUCH OPENINGS SHALL BE PERMITTED BEYOND THE |
| | SPECIFIED LIMITS, PROVIDED THAT EVERY FLOOR LEVEL HAS |
| | DIRECT ACCESS TO ONE OR MORE ENCLOSED STAIRS OR OTHER |
| | EXITS PROTECTED AGAINST OBSTRUCTION BY ANY FIRE OR |
| | SMOKE IN THE OPEN AREAS CONNECTED BY THE UNPROTECTED |
| | VERTICAL OPENINGS. |
| | (2) APPROVED EXISTING OPEN STAIRS, EXISTING OPEN RAMPS, |
| | AND EXISTING ESCALATORS SHALL BE PERMITTED WHERE |
| | CONNECTING ONLY TWO FLOOR LEVELS. |
| | (3) APPROVED, EXISTING, UNPROTECTED VERTICAL OPENINGS |
| | IN BUILDINGS WITH LOW OR ORDINARY HAZARD CONTENTS THAT |
| | ARE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC |
| | SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH 9.7.1.1(1) SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED, PROVIDED THAT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS |
| | EXIST: |
| | (A) THE VERTICAL OPENING DOES NOT SERVE AS A REQUIRED |
| | EXIT. |
| | (B) ALL REQUIRED EXITS CONSIST OF OUTSIDE STAIRS IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH 7.2.2, SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURES IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH 7.2.3, OR HORIZONTAL EXITS IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH 7.2.4. |
| | (4) VERTICAL OPENINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 8.6.9.1 SHALL |
| | BE PERMITTED |
| | |
| | THIS IS NOT AN APPROVED EXISTING STAIR. THE PROPOSED IS |
| | A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CORRECT OR PROVIDE CLARIFICATION OR |
| | JUSTIFICATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET LS 1 - THERE ARE TWO (2) STAIRWAYS INDICATED. |
| | |
| | THERE IS NO STAIR DETAIL OR INDICATIONS THAT THEY |
| | COMPLY WITH THE CODE PER 40.2.2.3 STAIRS. |
| | 40.2.2.3.1 STAIRS SHALL COMPLY WITH 7.2.2 AND SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO BE MODIFIED BY ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) NONCOMBUSTIBLE GRATED STAIR TREADS AND |
| | NONCOMBUSTIBLE GRATED LANDING FLOORS SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED. |
| | (2) INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT ACCESS STAIRS IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH 40.2.5.2 SHALL BE PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE HEADROOM. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CORRECT AND PROVIDE STAIR DETAIL. |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) SHEET LS 1 - THE DOOR SWINGS FROM THE THE PRODUCTION |
| | AREA SHOW THEM SWINGING AGAINST THE DIECTION OF EGRESS. |
| | |
| | PER SECTION 40.2.2.2 DOORS. |
| | 40.2.2.2.1 DOORS COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1 SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 7.2.1.4.2 DOOR LEAF SWING DIRECTION. DOOR LEAVES |
| | REQUIRED TO BE OF THE SIDE-HINGED OR PIVOTED-SWINGING |
| | TYPE SHALL SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL |
| | UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: |
| | (1) WHERE SERVING A ROOM OR AREA WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | OF 50 OR MORE, EXCEPT UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING |
| | CONDITIONS: |
| | (A) DOOR LEAVES IN HORIZONTAL EXITS SHALL NOT BE |
| | REQUIRED TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL |
| | WHERE PERMITTED BY 7.2.4.3.8.1 OR 7.2.4.3.8.2. |
| | (B) DOOR LEAVES IN SMOKE BARRIERS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED |
| | TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL IN EXISTING |
| | HEALTH CARE OCCUPANCIES, AS PROVIDED IN CHAPTER 19. |
| | (2) WHERE THE DOOR ASSEMBLY IS USED IN AN EXIT |
| | ENCLOSURE, UNLESS THE DOOR OPENING SERVES AN INDIVIDUAL |
| | LIVING UNIT THAT OPENS DIRECTLY INTO AN EXIT ENCLOSURE |
| | (3) WHERE THE DOOR OPENING SERVES A HIGH HAZARD |
| | CONTENTS AREA |
| | |
| | PLEASE CORRECT OR CLARIFY IN RELATION TO (3) AND |
| | COMMENT # 1 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) SHEET LS 1 - A KITCHENETTE IS INDICATED; HOWEVER, AN |
| | EQUIPMENT PLAN IS NOT. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A KITCHETTE EQUIPMENT PLAN. |
| | |
| | 8) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
