| Date |
Text |
| 2016-09-26 11:13:57 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | |
| | 1- INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE |
| | SUBMITTED AND INFORMATION SHOWN ON PLANS DON'T MATCH. |
| | ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SPECIFIES FLOOD VENTS. PLANS |
| | DON'T SHOW FLOOD VENTS. THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION OF |
| | THE GARAGE DON'T MATCH. CLEARLY SPECIFY ON PLANS THE |
| | GARAGE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION AT THE LOWEST POINT (AT |
| | GARAGE ENTRY DOOR). IF THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION IS |
| | LOWER THAN 7'-6" THEN FLOOD VENTS ARE REQUIRED (SEC. |
| | R322 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). REVISE PLANS |
| | AND ELEVATION CERTIFICATE TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R401.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITED RECOMMENDS AUGERED |
| | CAST-IN-PLACE PILES BASED ON THE TYPE OF SOIL |
| | ENCOUNTERED. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW |
| | SOIL TEST REPORT AND REVISE PLANS ACCORDINGLY OR |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS SHOWING THAT |
| | PROPOSED FOUNDATIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO RESIST THE LOADS |
| | EVEN IF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER RECOMMENDS PILING |
| | FOUNDATIONS. SEC. R301.1 FBC |
| | |
| | 3- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITED: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING OWNER NAME, BUILDER NAME, PERMIT OFFICE AND |
| | JURISDICTION NUMBER. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PERMIT OFFICE AND JURISDICTION NUMBER ARE INCORRECT. |
| | THIS IS CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH , JURISDICTION #604700 |
| | NOT PALM BEACH JURISDICTION #603800. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) COMPLETE THE INSPECTION CHECKLIST (TABLE 402.4.1.1 |
| | SUBMITED) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | INSPECTION CHECKLIST WAS NOT COMPLETED. |
| | |
| | NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR |
| | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING |
| | THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. |
| | |
| | 4- COVER DRAWING: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) ENERGY CODE SECTION REFERENCED ON GENERAL NOTE #7 |
| | NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO CURRENT CODE. SEE RESIDENTIAL |
| | SECTION OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | AND PROVIDE CORRECT SECTION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REFERENCED CODE SECTION IS INCORRECT. |
| | |
| | 5- SHEET A000: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) REVISE CONSTRUCTION TYPE. SEE TABLE 601 AND SEC. |
| | 602.5 OF FBC-BUILDING, 5TH EDITION (2014) FOR CORRECT |
| | TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THIS BUILDING IS NOT TYPE III. SEE TABLE 601 FOR |
| | REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE RATING REQUIRED TO QUALIFY FOR |
| | TYPE III CONSTRUCTION. TYPICALLY SINGLE FAMILY |
| | RESIDENCES ARE TYPE VB CONSTRUCTION. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6- SHEET A101: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) SIZE OF EGRESS WINDOWS FOR BEDROOMS #2, #3 AND #4 IS |
| | NOT CLEAR. THE WINDOW FRAME SIZE SPECIFIED ON THE |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET A550 IS NOT LISTED ON THE |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITED (NOA |
| | 15-0129.03). IF THIS IS A CUSTOM SIZED WINDOW, THEN |
| | PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S CUT SHEETS SHOWING THAT THE |
| | SPECIFIED SIZE OF WINDOW COMPLY WITH ALL THE OPENING |
| | DIMENSIONS REQUIRED BY SEC. R310 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ON |
| | THE OTHER HAND, DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE EGRESS WINDOW |
| | DRAWING ON SHEET A550 DON'T MATCH DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON |
| | THE WINDOW SCHEDULE AND WINDOW TYPE "C" DETAIL SHOWN ON |
| | THE SAME DRAWING. REVISE AS REQUIRED SO EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS CAN BE VERIFIED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SIZE SHOWN ON THE WINDOW SCHEDULE IS NOT LISTED ON THE |
| | MIAMI-DADE NOA. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S CUT SHOWING |
| | SHOWING THAT THE SPECIFIED WINDOW SIZE WILLL MEET ALL |
| | THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) ATTIC ACCESSS LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL ROOM DOESN'T |
| | COMPLY WITH SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ATTIC ACCESS |
| | SHALL BE LOCATED IN A HALLWAY OR OTHER READILY |
| | ACCESSIBLE LOCATION. THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WIL BLOCK |
| | THE DIRECT ACCESS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A/C EQUIPMENT AND DUCTWORK OBSTRUCT THE ATTIC ACCESS. |
| | ATTIC ACCES LOCATED IN THIS CLOSET IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. |
| | REVISE LOCATION OF ATTIC ACCESS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 7- ACCORDING TO SIZE OF WINDOWS SHOWN ON THE WINDOW |
| | SCHEDULE, WINDOW TYPES AND WINDOW SILL DETAIL SHOWN ON |
| | SHEET A550 IT LOOKS LIKE THE SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS NEED |
| | TO COMPLY WITH THE WINDOW FALL PROTECTION SEC. R312.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THIS CAN ONLY BE VERIFIED WHEN THE EXACT SIZE OF THE |
| | WINDOWS (INCLUDING THE EGRESS WINDOWS) IS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 8- SHEET A302: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SLOPE |
| | OF THE TERRACE DECK. THE REQUIRED SLOPE IS 1/4 PER |
| | FOOT. FOR DRAINAGE. SEC. R905.11.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SAME APPLIES TO SHEET A303. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THE REQUIRED SLOPE OF 1/4 PER FOOT IS FOR FINISH FLOOR |
| | ALSO. REVISE ALL PLANS/DETAILS AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF THE TERRACE GUARDRAILS SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE LIVE LOADS OF TABLE R301.5 AND SEC. |
| | R312.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. WROUGHT ALUMINUM NOTES ARE JUST |
| | CITING CODE SECTIONS. CODE SECTIONS CITED ARE |
| | INCORRECT. CITING THE CODE AS A WHOLE OR IN PART IS NOT |
| | ALLOWED (SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS). REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED AND PROVIDE COMPLETE DESIGN INFORMATION. NOTE: |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | FABRICATION/INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | SAME APPLIES TO SHEET A303. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE THE SPECIFICATIONS. SHOP |
| | DRAWINGS WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | FABRICATION/INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | SAME APPLIES TO SHEET A303. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 9- PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT. FOR THE ICYNENE FOAM |
| | INSULATION SPECIFIED ON PLANS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PROVIDE CURRENT ICC EVALUATION REPORT ESR-1826. REPORT |
| | SUBMITED IS VALID FROM 02/15 TO 02/16. AND, DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD TO REVIEW/APPROVE IN WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 10- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. AND, SPECIFY |
| | MULLION SIZE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTAL: |
| | NOA 14-0731.06 FOR ES WINDOWS, LLC MULLIONS AND |
| | DRAWINGS #AWD006 FOR ANDERSEN CORPORATION MULLIONS. |
| | PROVIDE ONLY ONE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE SPECIFIC |
| | MULLION TO BE USED. NOTE: IF USING THE ANDERSEN |
| | CORPORATION DRAWINGS, THEN NEED TO PROVIDE EITHER A |
| | CURRENT FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT |
| | IDENTIFY DRAWINGS SUBMITTED OR MANUFACTURER MAY SUBMITT |
| | COMPLETE ORIGINAL ENGINEERING PACKAGE FOR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) HARDI PLANK SIDING AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR INSTALLATION ON CONCRETE |
| | BLOCK WALL AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOA 15-0122.04 SUBMITTED |
| | DOESN'T INCLUDE THIS INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C) INSWING FRENCH DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR THE LOFT |
| | AREA. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NEED FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL OR MIAMI-DADE NOA THAT |
| | INCLUDES DRAWINGS #AWD021 FOR ANDERSEN CORPORATION |
| | DOORS SUBMITTED. OR MANUFACTURER MAY SUBMITT COMPLETE |
| | ORIGINAL ENGINEERING PACKAGE FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D) ENTRY DOOR WITH SIDELITES AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT CLEAR WHICH ONE IS THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE |
| | ENTRY DOOR. CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH DRAWINGS ARE FOR THE |
| | ENTRY DOOR. NOTE: NEED EITHER CURRENT FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL PACKAGE OR MIAMI-DADE NOA. OTHERWISE, |
| | MANUFACTURER MAY SUBMITT COMPLETE ORIGINAL ENGINEERING |
| | PACKAGE FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | E) DOUBLE FRENCH DOORS WITH SIDELITES AS SHOWN ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT CLEAR WHICH ONE IS THE PRODUCT APPROVAL USED. |
| | CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH DRAWINGS ARE FOR THE FRENCH |
| | DOORS WITH SIDELITES. NOTE: NEED EITHER CURRENT FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL PACKAGE OR MIAMI-DADE NOA. OTHERWISE, |
| | MANUFACTURER MAY SUBMITT COMPLETE ORIGINAL ENGINEERING |
| | PACKAGE FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | F) LAUNDRY EXTERIOR DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND DOOR |
| | SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT CLEAR WHICH ONE IS THE PRODUCT APPROVAL USED. |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT "THE SAME NOA FOR THE ENTRY |
| | DOOR CAN BE USED". THERE WAS NO NOA SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | ENTRY DOOR. AND, ENTRY DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL USED IS |
| | NOT CLEAR EITHER. ALSO, THERE WAS A FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FL5891.5 SUBMITTED FOR FIBERGLASS DOOR. WHAT'S |
| | THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR?. NOTE: NEED EITHER CURRENT |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL PACKAGE OR MIAMI-DADE NOA. |
| | OTHERWISE, MANUFACTURER MAY SUBMITT COMPLETE ORIGINAL |
| | ENGINEERING PACKAGE FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL BY THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | G) HURRICANE SHUTTERS AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE CITY SAMPLE OF |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE OR PROVIDE ANY OTHER FORMAT THAT |
| | CONTAINS ALL THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DECORATIVE SHUTTERS STILL NEED MANUFACTURER'S COMPLETE |
| | INFORMATION AND COMPLETE INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS TO |
| | RESIT THE WIND LOADS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | H) WATERPROOFING UNDERLAYMENT USED FOR THE MASTER AND |
| | POOL TERRACES. NEED PRODUCT THAT IS DESIGNED TO RECEIVE |
| | CAST STONE FLOORING AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. NOTE: |
| | CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY FROM THE |
| | SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVAL IS GOING TO BE USED TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SELECTED APPROVED ASSEMBLY ON PAGE 42 OF MIAMI-DADE NOA |
| | 15-1001.04 SUBMITTED IS NOT DESIGNED TO RECEIVE CAST |
| | STONE FINISH MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. NEED |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR UNDERLAYMENT THAT LIST THE |
| | PROPOSED FINISH. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 11- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL THE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | IMPORTANT: |
| | (1) ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WILL BE REQUIRED DURING |
| | CONSTRUCTION. NOTE: COORDINATE ALL ELEVATION |
| | CERTIFICATES WITH SAMANTHA HILL AT [email protected] OR |
| | (561)805-6724 TO AVOID CONFLICTS OR DELAYS. |
| | (2) SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE DESIGNED FLOOR SYSTEM, |
| | HANDRAIL AND GUARDRAILS. NOTE: PACKAGES TO BE APPROVED |
| | BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS |
| | OFFICE. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ***PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| | FOR REFERENCE |
| | |
| | |
| | ***PILES REQUIRE SPECIAL INSPECTOR |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
