| Date |
Text |
| 2016-07-25 15:15:28 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) REVISION, THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | 07/25/16 TALKED TO WARREN VON WERNE (ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD) TO GO OVER COMMENTS. IT LOOKS LIKE MR. VON |
| | WERNE DIDN'T GET MY SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS. I AM |
| | E-MAILING THE COMMENTS BELOW TO MR. VON WERNE. THE |
| | COMMENTS BELOW ARE A COPY OF THE SECOND REVIEW, SINCE |
| | THE RE-SUBMITTAL PACKAGE DOESN'T ADDRESS THOSE |
| | COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- ORIGINAL APPROVED PLANS DON'T INCLUDE FLAT ROOF |
| | SYSTEMS. ENGINEER OF RECORD NEEDS TO REVISE PLANS |
| | SPECIFYING THE PROPOSED FLAT ROOF. |
| | PROVIDE TWO SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS SHOWING THE |
| | REVISION. SEC. R301 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A) REVISED DRAWING S-2 SPECIFIES "MODIFIED BITUMEN |
| | ROOFING OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING (PER NOA |
| | #13-1022.15, 13-0416.05, AND #12-1219.02)". IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR WHAT IS GOING TO BE THE FINISH ROOF MATERIAL. |
| | SPECIFIED NOA'S ARE FOR THREE DIFFERENT TYPES OF |
| | ASSEMBLIES BY DIFFERENT MANUFACTURER'S. NEED TO PROVIDE |
| | THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1)IDENTIFY WHICH NOA IS GOING TO BE USED IN THIS ROOF |
| | DECK, THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE NOA (2 COPIES). |
| | (2) IDENTIFY WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE |
| | USED. |
| | (3) PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS (2 |
| | COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON LAST |
| | PAGE OF NOA. (NOTE: ASSEMBLIES WITH GENERAL LIMITATION |
| | #9 CAN NOT BE USED BECAUSE THEY DON'T ALLOW RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS). |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- FLAT ROOF NOA 11-0601.10 SUBMITTED IS NOT DESIGNED |
| | FOR FLAT ROOF. THIS NOA IS AN UNDERLAYMENT FOR PITCHED. |
| | ROOFS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | (A) PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) FOR FLAT ROOF |
| | SYSTEM THAT IS DESIGNED FOR THE ROOF DECK FINISH AS |
| | SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33). |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SEE COMMENTS FOR ITEM #1 ABOVE AND COORDINATE |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | (B) CLEARLY IDENTIFY APPROVED ASSEMBLY TO BE USED FROM |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL RE-SUBMITTED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301 OF 2010 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SEE COMMENTS FOR ITEM #1 ABOVE AND COORDINATE |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | |
| | (C) IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE |
| | CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED RAS |
| | 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED. SEC. R301 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SEE COMMENTS FOR ITEM #1 ABOVE AND COORDINATE |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | |
| | (D) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) FLAT ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SEE COMMENTS FOR ITEM #1 ABOVE AND COORDINATE |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- THIS FLAT ROOF SYSTEM WAS NOT PART OF THE APPROVED |
| | PLANS. SPECIFY THE ADDITIONAL VALUE FOR THE NEW FLAT |
| | ROOF AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THERE ARE MORE REVISION SHOWN ON SHEET S-2. REVISED |
| | PLAN SHOW NEW W12X22 STEEL BEAMS INSTEAD OF GLU LAM |
| | BEAMS. SPECIFY THE ADDITIONAL VALUE BASED ON THE |
| | PROPOSED REVISIONS. INCLUDE THE ENGINEER'S DESIGN FEES |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | 4- PATIO FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S-2 SPECIFIES NEW W12X22 |
| | STEEL BEAMS. DETAILS ON SHEET S-3 WERE NOT REVISED TO |
| | SHOW THE CONNECTIONS OF WOOD JOISTS TO THE STEEL BEAM. |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS FOR: |
| | A) CONNECTION OF WOOD JOIST TO STEEL BEAM. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC 2010. |
| | |
| | B) CONNECTION OF 3/4" PLYWOOD TO THE STEED BEAM. SEC. |
| | R301.1 FBC 2010. |
| | |
| | C) CONNECTION OF 1X6 T&G WOOD CEILING TO STEEL BEAM. |
| | SEC. R301.1 FBC 2010. |
| | |
| | 5- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | WOOD RAILING BY THE SPECIALTY ENGINEER AS SPECIFIED ON |
| | DETAILS ON SHEET S-3. |
| | SEC. R301.1 FBC 2010. NOTE: THIS INFORMATION NEED TO BE |
| | PROVIDED FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS OR DELAYS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
