| Date |
Text |
| 2016-06-01 12:20:44 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST (INCLUDED ONLY THE PORTION |
| | APPLICABLE TO THIS SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | 1. EVIDENCE OF DELEGATED ENGINEERING REVIEW IS TO BE |
| | ACCOMPLISHED IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS (FBC 107): |
| | |
| | B. A REVIEW LETTER, SIGNED AND SEALED IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH FAC61G15-23.002/FS471. THE LETTER IS TO BE VERY |
| | SPECIFIC - ENGINEER NAME AND FIRM, DRAWINGS REVIEWED |
| | (SHEET NUMBERS, DATES, NAME OF DRAWINGS). THE LETTER |
| | SUBMITTED HAS A DIGITALLY CREATED SIGNATURE, REFERS TO |
| | DRAWINGS PREPARED BY CECO, BUT CECO DELEGATED TO |
| | ANOTHER ENGINEER AND FIRM OR, |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, LETTER IS SIGNED AND SEALED BUT NOT |
| | REVISED. THIS DELEGATED ENGINEERING REVIEW LETTER WAS |
| | REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND HE DETERMINED |
| | THAT THE LETTER IN ITS CURRENT STATE DID NOT REFER |
| | SPECIFICALLY ENOUGH TO THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING. |
| | |
| | THE LETTER DOES NOT REFER TO ANY SHEET NUMBERS OR DATES |
| | |
| | THE LETTER REFERS TO ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS AND |
| | CALCULATIONS "PREPARED BY SUNCOAST POST-TENSION." IT |
| | DOES NOT APPEAR THAT SUNCOAST POST-TENSION DID NOT |
| | PREPARE THE DRAWINGS. BASED ON THE SEAL AND TITLE |
| | BLOCK, THE ENGINEERING WAS PREPARED BY RAFAEL E. |
| | PUERTA, PE, OF DPS INC. |
| | |
| | 2. FOR DELEGATED ENGINEERING REVIEW PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED |
| | WITH A DIGITAL IMAGE OF A SIGNATURE, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED ORIGINALS TO PROPERLY DOCUMENT THE |
| | FILE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
