| Date |
Text |
| 2016-05-31 12:30:30 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 05.31.2016 |
| | PERMIT NO.: 16050508 |
| | ADDRESS: 1300 ALLENDALE ROAD |
| | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: CHESTER RICHMOND |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 772.288.1151 |
| | SCOPE OF REVIEW: FENCING. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT AND ACCURATE SURVEY |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2. THE LOCATION IDENTIFIED FOR THE 9 FOOT ALUMINUM |
| | FENCE APPEARS TO BE DRAWN INCORRECTLY ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | THE PLAN HAS THE LOCATION OF THE FENCING AS BEING |
| | WITHIN THE EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 3. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE GATE PROPOSED AS PART OF THE |
| | NINE (9) FOOT ALUMNIUM FENCE WILL NOT IMPEDE OR IMPACT |
| | PARKED CARS ON EITHER SIDE. IT APPEARS THAT THE |
| | DISTANCE BETWEEN THE GATE AND THE CURB IS MINIMAL. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT A 2 FOOT OVERHANG PAST THE CURB NEEDS |
| | TO BE PROVIDED TO ALLOW THE FRONT OVERHANG OF THE |
| | VEHICLE. |
| | |
| | 4. THE SIX (6) FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE IS SHOWN WITHIN AN |
| | EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT AND FPL EASEMENT. EASEMENT |
| | CONSENT SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES, |
| | OR THE FENCE SHALL BE RELOCATED. |
| | |
| | 5. PLEASE CLARIFY, IS THE SIX (5) FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE |
| | NOT PROPOSED TO ENCLOSE THE ENTIRE PARKING AREA? THE |
| | SUBMITTED DRAWING ONLY SHOWS IT ONLY GOING AROUND HALF |
| | OF THE PARKING AREA. |
| | |
| | 6. AS PER THE APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, |
| | THE PROPOSED FENCE IS TO BE LOCATED ON THE INSIDE OF |
| | THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE BUFFER; AS DRAWN ON THE |
| | SUBMITTED DRAWINGS, IT APPEARS THAT THE FENCE IS BEING |
| | PROPOSED ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE ADJUST THE |
| | SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ACCORDINGLY. I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU |
| | TO USE SHEET SP-1 OF THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR |
| | PURPOSES OF YOUR SITE PLAN; IT ALREADY IDENTIFIES THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED FENCING. |
| | |
| | 7. THE APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT DID NOT |
| | IDENTIFY ANY FENCING GOING AROUND THE NEW PARKING AREA |
| | (SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PARKLAND ROAD AND ALLENDALE ROAD). |
| | IF MODIFICATIONS ARE BEING MADE TO THE APPROVED PLAN, A |
| | MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE BROWN DISTRIBUTING INDUSTRIAL |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (IPD) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | F: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
