| Date |
Text |
| 2016-06-10 11:33:57 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) THE PERMIT IS FOR A SITE WALL. THE PLANS INCLUDE |
| | MUCH MORE THAN JUST SITE WALL DETAILS. PLEASE HIGHLIGHT |
| | THE LOCATION OF THE WORK SPECIFICALLY COVERED BY THIS |
| | PERMIT, TO INCLUDE THE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 2) WHAT APPEARS TO BE THE SITE WALL ON SHEET G2.1 IS |
| | DIFFERENT FROM WHAT APPEARS TO BE THE SITE WALL ON |
| | SHEET S-1.1. ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW SAME CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE SITE PLAN G1.1 IS ILLEGIBLE WITH ALL THE CROSS |
| | HATCHING. |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE A SURVEY OR CIVIL PLAN WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS |
| | THE SETBACK DIMENSION FROM THE FLAGLER DRIVE PROPERTY |
| | LINE TO THE FACE OF THE SITE WALL ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE. |
| | IT SHALL BE CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED THAT NO PORTION OF THE |
| | SITE WALL IS CLOSER THAN 25 FEET TO THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | THIS IS DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE WALL AND WALL WITH |
| | FENCE ON TOP EXCEEDS FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT WHEN |
| | MEASURED FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE. |
| | |
| | 5) THE SIGNAGE ON THE WALL REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT |
| | WITH PLANS. |
| | |
| | 6) THE PROPOSED WALL APPEARS TO BLOCK THE EXISTING |
| | PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT. PROVIDE A PLAN THAT SHOWS |
| | HOW THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ACROSS THE SITE WILL BE |
| | MAINTAINED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WALL. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS SHALL NOT BE IMPEDED |
| | DURING ANY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
