| Date |
Text |
| 2016-05-02 10:12:59 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET A 6.2 - THE DOOR SCHEDULE DOES NOT INCLUDE |
| | INDICATIONS TO DOORS IN SMOKE PARTITIONS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATING |
| | WHICH DOORS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, CHAPTER 14, |
| | 14.3.6 (A) & CHAPTER 8, 8.4. SMOKE PARTITIONS. |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET A 6.2 - THE DOOR SCHEDULE DOES NOT INDICATE |
| | EXIT HARDWARE ON EXIT DOORS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATING |
| | WHICH DOORS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS, 7.2.1.7 PANIC HARDWARE AND FIRE EXIT |
| | HARDWARE. |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET A 1.1 - DOORS INDICATED AS 100 / 3 SHOW THEM |
| | OPENING INTO THE EXIT CORRIDOR. |
| | |
| | PER SECTION NFPA 101, DOOR SWING DIRECTION, 7.2.1.4.2, |
| | DOOR IS REQUIRED TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS |
| | TRAVEL FOR AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 50 OR GREATER PERSONS. |
| | PER NFPA 101 CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | 7.2.1.4.3 DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT |
| | 7.2.1.4.3.1 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS |
| | OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE |
| | REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY, |
| | OR A LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED AND SHALL NOT PROJECT NOT |
| | MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A |
| | CORRIDOR, A PASSAGE WAY, OR A LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN, |
| | UNLESS BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET: |
| | (1) THE DOOR OPENING PROVIDES ACCESS TO A STAIR IN AN |
| | EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | (2) THE DOOR OPENING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS THAT LIMITS |
| | PROJECTION TO NOT MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED |
| | WIDTH OF THE STAIR LANDING WHEN THE DOOR LEAF IS FULLY |
| | OPEN. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE INDICATIONS/DIMENSIONS |
| | COMPLYING WITH THE THE CODE. |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
