| Date |
Text |
| 2016-04-13 12:30:39 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET A 1 - IT IS NOTED THAT DOORS IN THE CORRIDOR |
| | ARE INDICATED AS FIRE RATED; NO FIRE RATING INDICATED, |
| | NO RATED HARDWARE. THE CORRIDOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL |
| | COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, CHAPTER 12. |
| | |
| | 12.3.6 CORRIDORS. INTERIOR CORRIDORS AND LOBBIES SHALL |
| | BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 7.1.3.1 AND SECTION |
| | 8.3, UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY ONE OF THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) CORRIDOR AND LOBBY PROTECTION SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED |
| | WHERE ASSEMBLY ROOMS SERVED BY THE CORRIDOR OR LOBBY |
| | HAVE AT LEAST 50 PERCENT OF THEIR EXIT CAPACITY |
| | DISCHARGING DIRECTLY TO THE OUTSIDE, INDEPENDENT OF |
| | CORRIDORS AND LOBBIES. |
| | (2) CORRIDOR AND LOBBY PROTECTION SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED |
| | IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN APPROVED, |
| | SUPERVISEDAUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | SECTION 9.7. |
| | (3) LOBBIES SERVING ONLY ONE ASSEMBLY AREA THAT MEET |
| | THE REQUIREMENTS FOR INTERVENING ROOMS (SEE 7.5.1.6) |
| | SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO HAVE A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. |
| | (4) WHERE THE CORRIDOR CEILING IS AN ASSEMBLY HAVING A |
| | 1-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING WHERE TESTED AS A WALL, |
| | THE CORRIDOR WALLS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO TERMINATE AT |
| | THE CORRIDOR CEILING. |
| | (5) CORRIDOR AND LOBBY PROTECTION SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED |
| | IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN APPROVED, TOTAL |
| | (COMPLETE) COVERAGE SMOKE DETECTION SYSTEM PROVIDING |
| | OCCUPANT NOTIFICATION AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | SECTION 9.6. |
| | |
| | THE DESIGN DOES NOT MEET 1-5 ABOVE.... |
| | |
| | 7.1.3.1 EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS. CORRIDORS USED AS EXIT |
| | ACCESS AND SERVING AN AREA HAVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | EXCEEDING 30 SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE |
| | BUILDING BY WALLS HAVING NOT LESS THAN A 1-HOUR FIRE |
| | RESISTANCE RATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8.3, |
| | UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL NOT APPLY TO EXISTING |
| | BUILDINGS, PROVIDED THAT THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION |
| | DOES NOT CHANGE. |
| | (2) THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL NOT APPLY WHERE OTHERWISE |
| | PROVIDED IN CHAPTERS 11 THROUGH 43. |
| | |
| | THE CORRIDOR SHALL HAVE A 1-HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE RATING |
| | ON ALL SIDES, INCLUDING DOORS AND HARDWARE, INCLUDING |
| | CLOSERS. |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET A 1 - DOOR 4 IS NOT INDICATED AS FIRE RATED OR |
| | WITH EXIT HARDWARE. PLEASE PROVIDE RATING PER THE CODE |
| | NARRATIVE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET A 1 - AN EXIT SIGN IS NEEDED INSIDE THE |
| | FELLOWSHIP HALL AT THE DOUBLE DOORS. |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET E 1 - NO EXIT SIGNS OR EMERGENCY LIGHTS ARE |
| | INDICATED. PLEASE PROVIDE IN COMPLIANCE WITH NFPA 101, |
| | CHAPTER 12 & CHAPTER 7 |
| | |
| | 12.2.8 ILLUMINATION OF MEANS OF EGRESS. MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS, OTHER THAN FOR PRIVATE PARTY TENTS NOT |
| | EXCEEDING 1200 FT2 (112 M2), SHALL BE ILLUMINATED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7.8. |
| | 12.2.9 EMERGENCY LIGHTING. |
| | 12.2.9.1 EMERGENCY LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7.9. |
| | |
| | 12.2.10 MARKING OF MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | 12.2.10.1 MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH SIGNS |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7.10. |
| | |
| | 7.8 ILLUMINATION OF MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | 7.8.1 GENERAL. |
| | 7.8.1.1* ILLUMINATION OF MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7.8 FOR EVERY |
| | BUILDING AND STRUCTURE WHERE REQUIRED IN CHAPTERS 11 |
| | THROUGH 43. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS REQUIREMENT, EXIT |
| | ACCESS SHALL INCLUDE ONLY DESIGNATED STAIRS, AISLES, |
| | CORRIDORS, RAMPS, ESCALATORS, AND PASSAGEWAYS LEADING |
| | TO AN EXIT. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS REQUIREMENT, EXIT |
| | DISCHARGE SHALL INCLUDE ONLY DESIGNATED STAIRS, AISLES, |
| | CORRIDORS, RAMPS, ESCALATORS, WALKWAYS, AND EXIT |
| | PASSAGEWAYS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY. |
| | 7.8.1.2 ILLUMINATION OF MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE |
| | CONTINUOUS DURING THE TIME THAT THE CONDITIONS OF |
| | OCCUPANCY REQUIRE THAT THE MEANS OF EGRESS BE AVAILABLE |
| | FOR USE, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN7.8.1.2.2. |
| | |
| | 7.9 EMERGENCY LIGHTING. |
| | 7.9.1 GENERAL. |
| | 7.9.1.1* EMERGENCY LIGHTING FACILITIES FOR MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7.9 |
| | FOR THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES WHERE REQUIRED IN CHAPTERS |
| | 11 THROUGH 43 |
| | |
| | 7.9.2 PERFORMANCE OF SYSTEM. |
| | 7.9.2.1* EMERGENCY ILLUMINATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR A |
| | MINIMUMOF 1? HOURS IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE OF NORMAL |
| | LIGHTING. EMERGENCY LIGHTING FACILITIES SHALL BE |
| | ARRANGED TO PROVIDE INITIAL ILLUMINATION THAT IS NOT |
| | LESS THAN AN AVERAGE OF 1 FT-CANDLE (10.8 LUX) AND, AT |
| | ANY POINT, NOT LESS THAN 0.1 FT-CANDLE (1.1 LUX), |
| | MEASURED ALONG THE PATH OF EGRESS AT FLOOR LEVEL. |
| | ILLUMINATION LEVELS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO DECLINE TO |
| | NOT LESS THAN AN AVERAGE OF 0.6 FT-CANDLE (6.5 LUX) |
| | AND, ATANY POINT, NOT LESS THAN 0.06 FT-CANDLE (0.65 |
| | LUX) AT THE END OF 1? HOURS. A MAXIMUM-TO-MINIMUM |
| | ILLUMINATION UNIFORMITY RATIO OF 40 TO 1 SHALL NOT BE |
| | EXCEEDED. |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
