| Date |
Text |
| 2016-08-19 12:46:17 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, |
| | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: |
| | |
| | THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED |
| | AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE |
| | PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE |
| | INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET FP 501 - THERE IS NO INDICATIONS THAT ELBOWS |
| | AND T'S ARE GREATER THAN 10 THE SUCTION PIPE DIAMETER. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4.14.6.3 ELBOWS AND TEES. |
| | 4.14.6.3.1 UNLESS THE REQUIREMENTS OF 4.14.6.3.2 ARE |
| | MET, ELBOWS AND TEES WITH A CENTERLINE PLANE PARALLEL |
| | TO A HORIZONTAL SPLIT-CASE PUMP SHAFT SHALL NOT BE |
| | PERMITTED. (SEE FIGURE A.4.14.6.) |
| | 4.14.6.3.2 THE REQUIREMENTS OF 4.14.6.3.1 SHALL NOT |
| | APPLY TO ELBOWS AND TEES WITH A CENTERLINE PLANE |
| | PARALLEL TO A HORIZONTAL SPLIT-CASE PUMP SHAFT WHERE |
| | THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE FLANGES OF THE PUMP SUCTION |
| | INTAKE AND THE ELBOW AND TEE IS GREATER THAN 10 TIMES |
| | THE SUCTION PIPE DIAMETER. |
| | 4.14.6.3.3 ELBOWS WITH A CENTERLINE PLANE PERPENDICULAR |
| | TO THE HORIZONTAL SPLIT-CASE PUMP SHAFT SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED AT ANY LOCATION IN THE PUMP SUCTION INTAKE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE ON INSTALLATION. FIRE |
| | INSPECTOR WILL VERIFY ON INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
