| Date |
Text |
| 2016-05-11 15:11:44 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | |
| | 1- PROVIDE COPY OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
| | PAID RECEIPT. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF THE |
| | UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. |
| | |
| | 2- SHEET 2 OF 18: |
| | A) REVISE THE DESIGN CRITERIA. THE CORRECT CURRENT CODE |
| | IS FBC-5TH EDITION (2014) NOT 2012 FBC (5TH ADDITION). |
| | CHAPTER 553 FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | |
| | B) MASONRY WALL VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT SHOWN FOR THE |
| | DETACHED GARAGE AND MAIN HOUSE TO COMPLY WITH THE |
| | SPACING REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R609.3.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, |
| | 5TH EDITION (2014). REVISE REINFORCEMENT SPACING |
| | LOCATION AND SPECIFY DISTANCE BETWEEN SPACING. OR |
| | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT THE PROPOSED SPACING |
| | IS ADEQUATE TO RESIST ALL THE LOADS. (NOTE: SPECIFY IF |
| | USING SCHEDULE 40 OR 60 #5 BAR). |
| | |
| | C) THERE ARE SOME LARGE OPENINGS THAT HAVE ONLY ONE |
| | REINFORCED CELL AT EACH SIDE OF THE OPENINGS. SEE SEC. |
| | R609.3.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014) AND REVISE |
| | NUMBER OF FILLED CELLS AS REQUIRED. OR PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT THE PROPOSED SPACING IS |
| | ADEQUATE TO RESIST ALL THE LOADS. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET 7 OF 18: |
| | A) REVISE THE LIVE AND DEAD LOADS. THERE IS A NOTE "PER |
| | R-301.4 AND R-301.5 LIVE AND DEAD LOADS ARE 30 AND 25 |
| | TOTALING 55 ON ALL FLOORS AND ROOFS". THE LIVE LOAD IS |
| | NOT 30 FOR ALL FLOORS. THE LIVE LOADS FOR ROOMS OTHER |
| | THAN SLEEPING ROOMS IS NOT 30. SEE TABLE R301.5. IN |
| | ADDITION, CLEARLY SPECIFY THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD (SEE |
| | NOTES "B" AND "G" OF TABLE R301.5). CLEARLY SPECIFY THE |
| | LIVE AND DEAD LOADS SEPARATELY TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH EACH LOAD. |
| | NOTE: THIS COMMENT APPLIES TO SHEET 8 OF 18 ALSO. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | CONNECTION AT THE ENDS OF FLOOR TRUSS GIRDER LOCATED BY |
| | THE STAIRWAY. SPECIFY ALL CONNECTORS, POSTS, CONNECTORS |
| | OF THE POST (TOP & BOTTOM), POST FOOTING SPECS, ETC. |
| | ALSO, SPECIFY CONNECTORS FOR FLOOR TRUSS GIRDER BETWEEN |
| | LIVING ROOM AND MASTER BEDROOM AREA. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | ROOF DRAINAGE OF THE SUN DECK AREA SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH SEC. R903.4 AND PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE OVERFLOW SCUPPERS SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R903.4.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH |
| | EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | D) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | CONNECTORS AT THE ENDS OF ALL FLOOR TRUSSES. SEC. |
| | R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | E) SPECIFY ROOF TRUSS CONNECTORS FOR ROOF TRUSSES THAT |
| | ARE RESTING ON THE LEDGER BY THE SUN DECK WALL, ENTRY |
| | PORCH WALL AND MASTER SUITE WALL. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET 8 OF 18: TRUSS CONNECTOR SPECIFIED FOR THE |
| | MAIN ROOF GIRDERS DOESN'T MEET THE UPLIFT LOADS SHOWN |
| | ON THE TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED. REVISE CONNECTOR AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | 5- SHEET 9 OF 18: CLARIFY WHY SPECIFYING 6" DIAMETER |
| | CLAY DRAIN PIPES AT ALL THE GABLE ENDS. WHAT ARE THEY |
| | DRAINING IF ROOF IS DESIGNED AS UNVENTED. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: SAME APPLIES TO SHEET 10 OF 18. |
| | |
| | 6- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED; |
| | A) REVISE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM: PROVIDE CORRECT |
| | OWNER'S NAME, PERMIT OFFICE (WEST PALM BEACH NOT PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY), AND CORRECT JURISDICTION NUMBER. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | B) NUMBER OF BEDROOMS IS INCORRECT. SEE PLANS AND |
| | REVISE ITEM #4. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | C) CEILING INSULATION R-VALUE DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. SEE |
| | PLANS AND REVISE ITEM #10 AS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | D) ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 OF 7 IS INCORRECT. |
| | SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | E) FLOOR FINISH INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 7 IS |
| | INCORRECT. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | F) CLARIFY WHY THE R-VALUE OF THE CEILING INFORMATION |
| | ON PAGE 4 OF 7 DOESN'T MATCH R-VALUE SHOWN ON ITEM #10 |
| | ON PAGE 1 OF 7. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | G) REVISE THE WINDOWS OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION ON |
| | PAGE 5 & 6 OF 7 TO MATCH PLANS. SEE PLANS AND EXTERIOR |
| | ELEVATIONS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. NOTE: KEEP |
| | IN MIND THE OVERHANG DEPTH ON GABLE END WALLS. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR |
| | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT |
| | USING THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. |
| | |
| | 7- GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT SUBMITTED NEEDS TO |
| | HAVE THE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS |
| | REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES WHEN |
| | SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. |
| | |
| | 8- A) GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION FOUNDATION |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS ON PAGE 7 OF 8 SPECIFIES "ALL FOOTINGS |
| | AND COLUMNS SHOULD BE STRUCTURALLY SEPARATED FROM THE |
| | FLOOR SLAB, AS THEY WILL BE LOADED DIFFERENTLY AND AT |
| | DIFFERENT TIMES". ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW THE |
| | GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT SUBMITTED AND REVISE |
| | PLANS ACCORDINGLY OR PROVIDE ENGINEER ANALYSIS SHOWING |
| | THAT THE STRUCTURAL SEPARATION IS NO REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | R301.1 AND SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | AT THE BOTTOM OF PAGE 6 OF 8 SPECIFIES 18" MIN. WIDTH |
| | FOR CONTINUOUS STRIP FOOTINGS. ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO |
| | REVIEW THE GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT SUBMITTED |
| | AND REVISE PLANS ACCORDINGLY OR PROVIDE ENGINEER |
| | ANALYSIS SHOWING THAT THE FOOTING SIZE SPECIFIED ON THE |
| | FOUNDATION PLAN FOR GARAGE AND AREAS WITH ONE STORY |
| | ONLY IS ADEQUATE. SEC. R301.1 AND SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. IF |
| | SPECIFYING SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY NUMBER AND SIZE OF |
| | SCREW. IF SPECIFYING ADHESIVE, THEN CONTRACTOR TO |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 10- RAKE BEAM DETAIL ON SHEET 17 OF 18 DOESN'T PROVIDE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SIZE OF RAKE BEAM. AND, IT |
| | DOESN'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SPACING OF |
| | VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT, PLANS DON'T PROVIDE THAT |
| | INFORMATION EITHER. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION. SEE |
| | SEC. R609.4.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014) FOR |
| | VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT SPACING (SPECIFY IF USING |
| | SCHEDULE 40 OR 60 #5 REBAR). |
| | |
| | 11- SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807 FOR GARAGE, FAMILY AREA WING, |
| | MASTER BATH WING, MASTER BEDROOM WING AND SECOND FLOOR. |
| | |
| | 12- PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE ICYNENE |
| | INSULATION SPECIFIED ON PLANS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). NOTE: |
| | ARCHITECT TO REVIEW REPORT PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. CHECK |
| | R-VALUE SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND LIMITATIONS ON THE |
| | EVALUATION REPORT. |
| | |
| | 13- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | STAIRWAY SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. RR311.7.5 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 14- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS SHOWN ON PLANS TO COMPLY WITH |
| | THE LIVE LOAD OF TABLE R301.5 AND SECTIONS R311.7.8 AND |
| | R312 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 15- ROOF PROJECTIONS LESS THAN 5 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE NEED TO COMPLY WITH TABLE R302.1(1) |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). PROVIDE DETAIL AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE HOUR FIRE RATING ON THE |
| | UNDERSIDE OF THE PROJECTION AT SOUTH AND EAST GARAGE |
| | WALLS AND EAST WALL OF MAIN HOUSE. |
| | |
| | 16- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | FRAMING OF ALL ARCHED OPENINGS SHOWN ON EXTERIOR |
| | ELEVATIONS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | 17- ALL PLANS NEED TO SPECIFY THE ADDRESS OF THE JOB |
| | (ALSO, SPECIFY CORRECT NAME OF THE OWNER OF THE HOUSE). |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 18- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | FIREPLACE SHOWN ON PLANS. AND PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | MANUFACTURER SPECS (REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT OF |
| | RECORD). SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 10 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 19- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | A) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE (IF SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF |
| | RECORD). |
| | |
| | B) TRIPLE CASEMENT WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) ARCHED CASEMENT WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | D) GARAGE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOA 12-0110.08 |
| | SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON JULY 21, 2015. NEED CURRENT NOA. |
| | |
| | E) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTOR SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE |
| | AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR LIST THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NEXT TO EACH SPECIFIED |
| | CONNECTOR. |
| | |
| | 20- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 21- CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING MIAMI-DADE NOA 14-0908.18 |
| | FOR FIXED WINDOWS. PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY FIXED WINDOWS. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 22- TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED; |
| | A) PROVIDE BOTH COPIES WITH ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL |
| | AND SIGNATURE. ONLY ONE COPY WAS SIGNED AND SEALED. |
| | CHAPTER 471 F.S. |
| | |
| | B) TRUSS PACKAGE COVER SHEET IS MISSING: (1)THE |
| | INFORMATION OF THE PROFESSIONAL STRUCTURAL DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD (ARCHITECT) . (2) COMPLETE ADDRESS OF THE |
| | PROJECT. POTTER RD IS NOT AN ADDRESS. SEC. |
| | 61G15-31.003(5) |
| | |
| | C)"EACH OF THE DRAWINGS IN THE TRUSS DESIGN PACKAGE FOR |
| | INDIVIDUAL TRUSSES SHALL INCLUDE A TITLE BLOCK BEARING |
| | THE PRINTED NAME, ADDRESS, AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE |
| | TRUSS DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE DATE OF THE DRAWING" AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-31.003(5) |
| | |
| | D) TRUSS PACKAGE TO BE APPROVED BY THE PROFESSIONAL |
| | STRUCTURAL DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO |
| | THIS OFFICE. SEC. 107.3.4.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | E) ENGINEER TO SIGN AND SEAL ALL GENERAL DETAILS |
| | SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN |
| | SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. |
| | |
| | 23- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $575,420. |
| | THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $9696.88. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ***PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO THE NEW SET. |
| | SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
