| Date |
Text |
| 2016-04-20 15:01:59 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | CODE; FBC, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 1- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R101.4.3 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH |
| | EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 2- NEED TO SPECIFY ON PLANS CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS |
| | WITHIN 10 FEET OF ALL BEDROOMS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315 |
| | OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 3- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. |
| | BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID |
| | RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF |
| | THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. |
| | |
| | 4- EXISTING AND DEMOLITION PLAN ON SHEET 2 SHOWS |
| | EXISTING MEDIA ROOM. ACCORDING TO CITY RECORDS AND |
| | PROPERTY APPRAISER THIS ROOM IS AN UNFINISHED ENCLOSED |
| | PORCH NOT A LIVING SPACE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. THIS ROOM |
| | MAY BE CONVERTED TO A MEDIA ROOM AS SHOWN ON SHEET 4 |
| | BUT NEEDS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS (WALLS AND CEILING INSULATION) AND WITH |
| | THE ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS ( SEE ELECTRICAL REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS). SEC. 102.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5- FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET 4 SPECIFY EXISTING WINDOWS TO BE |
| | REPLACED. CLEARLY SPECIFY THE TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING |
| | BEDROOM WINDOWS AND TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED BEDROOM |
| | WINDOWS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 704 OF FBC-EXISTING BUILDING, 5TH |
| | EDITION (2014). NOTE: THIS INCLUDES THE EXISTING |
| | BEDROOM THAT WAS LOCATED ON THE NORTH-EAST CORNER AND |
| | WAS RENAMED AS "OFFICE". THIS ROOM CAN BE USED AS |
| | OFFICE OR BEDROOM. |
| | |
| | 6- WINDOW ON THE EXISTING BATHROOM WAS BLOCKED TO ALLOW |
| | FOR THE MASTER BEDROOM ADDITION. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE BATHROOM VENTILATION REQUIRED BY SEC. R303.3 OF |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: SEE EXCEPTION ON SEC. R303.3. |
| | |
| | 7- PROPOSED NEW FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET #4 SPECIFIES THE |
| | FINISH FLOOR AT THE NEW MEDIA ROOM TO BE RAISED TO |
| | MATCH EXISTING HOUSE FLOOR ELEVATION. SPECIFY THE NEW |
| | CEILING HEIGHT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R305 OF |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 8- SPECIFY SIZE OF ATTIC ACCESS LOCATED IN THE NEW |
| | MASTER BEDROOM WALK-IN-CLOSET TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 9- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHOW ROOF PITCH OF 3:12 +/-. |
| | NEED TO SPECIFY 2 LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R905.2.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 10- A) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATION S FOR THE BEAMS |
| | TO BE INSTALLED ON THE NEW ENTRY PORCH. ROOF FRAMING |
| | PLAN DOESN'T PROVIDE ANY SPECIFICATION. SEC. R301 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | B) CLARIFY CONNECTION OF ENTRY PORCH TO THE EXISTING |
| | WALL. ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET #5 SPECIFIES "BEAM |
| | CONNECTOR C. SEE DETAIL ON PG-7". THERE IS NO DETAIL ON |
| | PAGE 7. REVISE AS REQUIRED. CLEARLY SPECIFY CONNECTOR |
| | AT THE END OF THE BEAM. SEC. R301 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 11- ROOF SHEATHING SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON NAILING |
| | DETAIL ON SHEET #8, TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET #9 |
| | AND ROOF SHEATHING NOTES ON SHEET #10 DON'T MATCH |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON FASTENER SCHEDULE ON SHEET #5. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. NOTE: SEC. R803.2.3.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL REQUIRES 8D RING SHANK NAILS MIN. |
| | |
| | 12- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | A) ROOF SHINGLES SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | B) WINDOWS MULLIONS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. AND, CLEARLY |
| | IDENTIFY MULLION SIZE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | ENGINEER CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | C) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | D) GARAGE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS (IF IS GOING TO BE |
| | REPLACED). |
| | |
| | E) ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 13- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS (NOTE: |
| | INCLUDING THE ONES THAT WERE ALREADY SUBMITTED) AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 14- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $100,000. THE |
| | PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $2298.86. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ***PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWINGS. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO NEW SET OF |
| | PLANS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
