| Date |
Text |
| 2016-07-26 07:50:06 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATIONS, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ARCHITECT MAY BE CHARGE 4 TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW FEE AS |
| | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) IF PLANS |
| | CONTINUE TO BE DENIED. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. REVISE VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL THE |
| | ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND BUILDING WORK SHOWN ON PLANS |
| | AND ALL DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES. PLANS SHOW COMPLETE |
| | ALTERATION OF THE KITCHEN, INCLUDING THE RELOCATION OF |
| | THE KITCHEN SINK. NOTE: THERE IS A RED TAG ON THIS |
| | HOUSE FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT PERMITS. INSPECTOR NOTED |
| | SHEATHING, LATH, DOORS WORK. THIS SCOPE OF WORK NEEDS |
| | TO BE ADDED TO THE VALUATION ALSO. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. VALUE DECLARED IN THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION DOESN'T REFLECT ALL THE ELECTRICAL, |
| | PLUMBING AND BUILDING WORK SHOWN ON PLANS. IT NEEDS TO |
| | INCLUDE THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES ALSO. UPDATE THE |
| | VALUE TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS AND CONTRACTOR'S |
| | OVERHEAD AND PROFIT (EVEN IF IS DONE AS OWNER/BUILDER) |
| | AND INCLUDE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES. PROVIDE COPY OF |
| | CONTRACT SIGNED WITH THE ARCHITECT FOR THE RENDERED |
| | SERVICES. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DESIGN CRITERIA: |
| | SPECIFY CURRENT BUILDING CODE, BUILDING EXPOSURE, |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EXTERIOR DOORS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R301 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). NOTE: |
| | EXTERIOR DOORS WERE REPLACED. SEE NOTE ON ITEM #1 |
| | ABOVE. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- DETAIL SECTION SHOWN ON SHEET 2 OF 2: |
| | A) SPECIFY SIZE AND SPACING OF FRAMING MEMBERS TO SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301 OF |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) ARCHITECT TO CLARIFY WHY SPECIFYING "LSTA 18 EACH |
| | RAFTER". THIS IS A STRAP DESIGNED TO TRANSFER TENSION |
| | LOADS AND DOESN'T PROVIDE UPLIFT LOADS. ALSO, PROVIDE |
| | DETAIL SHOWING HOW THIS 18" LONG STRAP IS GOING TO BE |
| | INSTALLED IF THE STRAP IS NOT DESIGNED TO BE BENDED. |
| | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW THIS STRAP WILL RESIST |
| | THE UPLIFT LOADS OF SEC. R301 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH |
| | EDITION (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C) ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY HOW THE RAFTERS ARE FASTENED TO |
| | THE EXISTING RAFTERS TO RESIST THE LOADS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R301 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). THERE |
| | IS A NOTE THAT READS "OVERLAP HEALTHY EXISTING RAFTERS |
| | MIN. 3'-0", SECURELY SPIKE TOGETHER". THIS IS NOT AN |
| | ACCEPTABLE SPECIFICATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR THE SOFFIT |
| | MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| | R703.1.3 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | E) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROOF |
| | SHEATHING. SPECIFY TYPE OF WOOD AND NAIL SIZE AND |
| | SPACING SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). NOTE: 8D RING |
| | SHANK NAILS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | EXTERIOR WALL AREAS THAT NEED TO BE REPAIRED AS NOTED |
| | ON ITEM #1 ABOVE WITH THE INSPECTOR RED TAG. SEC. R301 |
| | OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) EXTERIOR DOORS A SHOWN ON PLANS AND NOTE ON ITEM #1 |
| | ABOVE. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) ROOF SHINGLES FOR THE OVERHANG EXTENSION AS SHOWN ON |
| | PLANS |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C) SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTOR SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE |
| | AND PAGE SHOWING THE ARCHITECT'S SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR |
| | ARCHITECT TO LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER |
| | NEXT TO THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING (NOT |
| | SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: A SEPARATE ROOFING SUB-PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | FOR THE SHINGLES INSTALLATION. ALSO, A SEPARATE PERMIT |
| | IS REQUIRED FOR A/C WORK. |
| | |
| | **** ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING |
| | EACH STRUCTURAL COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
