| Date |
Text |
| 2016-07-11 18:44:21 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON PLANS IS NOT CLEAR. THE DEMO |
| | FLOOR PLAN, THE KEY PLAN AND THE REMODELING NOTES SHOWN |
| | ON SHEET S1.1 DON'T MATCH. THE DEMO PLAN SHOWS |
| | EVERYTHING IN DOTTED LINE. WHY?. IS EVERYTHING GOING TO |
| | BE REMOVED?. THE DEMO PLAN ALSO SHOWS SOME AREAS WITH |
| | DIAGONALLY HATCHED LINES. WHAT IS THE WORK TO BE DONE |
| | ON THOSE AREAS. THERE IS NO WALL LEGEND IDENTIFYING |
| | THIS HATCHED LINES. CLEARLY IDENTIFY EACH WINDOW AND |
| | DOOR THAT IS GOING TO BE REPLACED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DEMO PLAN AND KEY PLAN STILL DON'T MATCH. SCOPE OF WORK |
| | IS NO CLEAR. PROVIDE ONE COMPLETE DEMOLITION PLAN AND A |
| | FLOOR PLAN SHOWING ALL THE PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK. |
| | DON'T MIX THE DEMOLITION PLAN WITH THE PROPOSED FLOOR |
| | PLAN. NOTE: KEEP IN MIND THAT ACCORDING TO CITY RECORDS |
| | AND PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER THERE IS AN |
| | ENCLOSED PORCH IN THE EAST SIDE AND ANOTHER ENCLOSED |
| | PORCH IN THE WEST SIDE OF THE HOUSE. ACCORDING TO THE |
| | DEMO PLAN THESE PORCHES WILL BE CONVERTED TO LIVING |
| | ROOM AND NOOK ACCORDINGLY. THE DEMO PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY |
| | THE EXISTING USE AND THE PROPOSED PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY |
| | THE PROPOSED CHANGES ACCORDINGLY. |
| | IN ADDITION THE WALL SCHEDULE AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN |
| | ON THE DEMO PLAN DON'T MATCH. PROVIDE A WALL SCHEDULE |
| | THAT CLEARLY IDENTIFIES ALL THE SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON |
| | THE REQUESTED PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. REVISE VALUATION BASED ON ALL THE SCOPE OF |
| | WORK SHOWN ON PLANS. AND ADD THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| | FEES. NOTE: INCLUDE THE KITCHEN RENOVATION, THE REAR |
| | ENCLOSED PORCH THAT WAS ALTERED FOR KITCHEN EXPANSION |
| | AND ALL THE REPAIRS TO THE EXTERIOR WALLS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | VALUATION WAS CHANGED TO $10,000 ON THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION. THIS IS STILL TOO LOW FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | SCOPE OR WORK. PROVIDE COPY OF SIGNED CONTRACT SHOWING |
| | ALL THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL REVIEW. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED BRING, THEM TO PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD) FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. |
| | (REAR ENCLOSED PORCH WAS ALTERED FOR KITCHEN EXPANSION. |
| | SEE NEW KITCHEN LAYOUT). BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED |
| | PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY |
| | IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | CODE. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | IN ADDITION THE EAST ENCLOSED PORCH WAS CONVERTED TO |
| | LIVING ROOM. AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED AND THE SCOPE OF |
| | WORK IS CLARIFIED , BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR |
| | IMPACT FEES STAMP THAT MATCHES SUBMITTED RECEIPT |
| | (MU-2016-014290). |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) VINYL SIDING AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 5- ENGINEER TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | (1) ON SHEET S1.1 THERE IS A NOTE UNDER THE HVAC, |
| | PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL NOTES THAT CARBON MONOXIDE |
| | ALARMS ARE NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE THERE ARE NO GAS |
| | APPLIANCES OR GARAGE IN THIS HOUSE. THERE IS AN |
| | EXISTING FIREPLACE IN THIS HOUSE. THEREFORE, THE CARBON |
| | MONOXIDE ALARMS ARE REQUIRED. SPECIFY LOCATION OF |
| | CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | (2) THE NEW FRAMED STAIRS SHOWN BY THE FAMILY ROOM NEED |
| | TO PROVIDE A LANDING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R311.3 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
