| Date |
Text |
| 2016-04-12 09:45:04 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. |
| | BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID |
| | RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF |
| | THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R101.4.3 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | 3- CLARIFY WHY THERE IS A BATHROOM AND ELECTRICAL |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR SMALL APPLIANCES, WATER HEATER AND AIR |
| | CONDITIONING FOR AN STORAGE BUILDING. ALSO, CLARIFY |
| | WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF HAVING SO MANY OUTLETS FOR AN |
| | STORAGE BUILDING. CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHAT IS THE PROPOSED |
| | USE OF THIS BUILDING. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET 1 OF 7: |
| | A) PLANS NEED TO BE DRAWN TO SCALE. ENGINEERED PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED DON'T MATCH THE SCALE SHOWN ON PLANS (SCALE: |
| | 1:40). REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) SPECIFY SPACING OF ALL FRAMING MEMBERS SHOWN ON THE |
| | FOUNDATION PLAN. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | C) PROPOSED FOUNDATION SECTION A/1 TO SHOW COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE HEIGHT ABOVE FINISHED GRADE SEC. R404.1.6 OF |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). (NOTE: COORDINATE |
| | WITH FOOTING SIZES SHOWN ON FOOTING SCHEDULE). |
| | |
| | D) PROPOSED FOUNDATION SECTION A/1 TO SHOW COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE MINIMUM FOOTING DEPTH AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R403.1.4 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). (NOTE: |
| | COORDINATE WITH FOOTING SIZES SHOWN ON FOOTING |
| | SCHEDULE). |
| | |
| | E) PROPOSED FOUNDATION SECTION A/1 TO SHOW COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE 6" MINIMUM CLEARANCE BETWEEN EXTERIOR WALL |
| | COVERING AND FINAL GRADE AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R318.7 OF |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). (NOTE: COORDINATE |
| | WITH FOOTING SIZES SHOWN ON FOOTING SCHEDULE). |
| | |
| | F) TYPICAL WINDOW FRAMING DETAIL AND TYP DOOR FRAMING |
| | DETAIL DON'T MATCH FRAMING SHOWN ON PLANS. SEE NUMBER |
| | AND TYPE OF STUDS SHOWN ON EACH END OF EACH OPENING. |
| | ALSO, SEE ROOF FRAMING PLAN FOR ORIENTATION OF ROOF |
| | JOISTS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | G) TYPE OF CONNECTORS SHOWN ON TYPICAL WINDOW DETAIL |
| | AND TYPICAL DOOR DETAIL DON'T MATCH TYPE OF CONNECTOR |
| | SPECIFIED. FOR EXAMPLE: SIMPSON H3 CONNECTOR DOESN'T |
| | LOOK THE WAY IT'S SHOWN. IT LOOKS MORE LIKE A TYPE "U" |
| | CONNECTOR THAT IS TYPICALLY USED FOR BOTTOM AND TOP |
| | PLATES TO CONNECT TO THE WOOD STUDS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5-SHEET 2 OF 7: |
| | A) PLANS NEED TO BE DRAWN TO SCALE. ENGINEERED PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED DON'T MATCH THE SCALE SHOWN ON PLANS (SCALE: |
| | 1:40). REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) PROPOSED ROOF SECTION A/2 SHOWS R-30 SPRAY |
| | INSULATION AND NEW 3" WIDE CONT. ALUM. AIR VENT. IT'S |
| | NOT CLEAR IF THE ROOF IS DESIGNED AS VENTED OR |
| | UNVENTED. SPRAY INSULATION IS TYPICALLY USED FOR |
| | UNVENTED ATTICS. BUT, DETAILS IS SHOWING VENTED SOFFIT |
| | AND SPRAY INSULATION. REVISE CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. SEE |
| | SEC. R806 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | C) PROPOSED ROOF SECTION A/2 SHOWS JOIST AT 12" O.C. |
| | THIS DOESN'T MATCH ROOF FRAMING PLAN. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) WALL SECTIONS NEED TO SPECIFY THE EXTERIOR FINISH. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE FOR STUCCO FINISH SEE TABLE R702.1(1) OF OF |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014) FOR REQUIRED |
| | THICKNESS. IF USING GYPSUM BOARD FOR INTERIOR FINISH, |
| | THEN SEE SEC. R702.3 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | 6- SHEET 3 OF 7: |
| | A) SPECIFY THE CEILING HEIGHT ON NON-LOAD BEARING WALL |
| | B/3 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R305 OF |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | B) PLANS NEED TO BE DRAWN TO SCALE. ENGINEERED PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED DON'T MATCH THE SCALE SHOWN ON PLANS (SCALE: |
| | 1:20). REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE TYPE OF SPRAY |
| | INSULATION TO BE INSTALLED SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| | R316 F FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). (NOTE: |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING THE |
| | REPORT PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE). |
| | |
| | 8- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | A) ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | B) WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS |
| | |
| | C) HURRICANE SHUTTERS, IF WINDOWS AND DOOR WITH GLAZING |
| | DON'T HAVE IMPACT GLASS. AND, PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 9- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 10- THE VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS |
| | TOO LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $11,642. ROBERT |
| | BROWN, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, LOWERED THE PENALTY FOR |
| | BUILDING WITHOUT PERMIT TO 2X THE PERMIT FEE INSTEAD OF |
| | 4X THE PERMIT FEE. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
