| Date |
Text |
| 2016-04-15 07:47:33 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | W. P. B. REVISION: 16030102 |
| | W. P. B. PERMIT: 15090236 |
| | ADD:2087 PALM BEACH LAKES |
| | CONT: LM DEVELOPMENT GROUP |
| | TEL: ( 954)476-0800 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2014 WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| | ADMINISTRATION |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | DATE: FRI. APRIL 15/2016 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) NOTICE ONLY, NO ACTION NEEDED AT THIS TIME. REVISION |
| | INCREASE WENT FROM $10,000 TO $95,000.00 FOR THE |
| | MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING BEING ADDED TO THE |
| | BASE BUILDING PERMIT. NOTE VALUES GO ON THE BASE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT. SUB-PERMITS COME IN AS A $80.00 COST |
| | FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, NO VALUE. |
| | |
| | 2) SEMI-COMPLIED . REVISION SHEET S-4 PROVIDES THE |
| | ANCHOR DETAILS FOR THE CURB TO THE DECK AND THE ROOF |
| | TOP UNIT TO THE CURB. WE ARE STILL MISSING THE APPROVAL |
| | FOR THE CURB. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO SUBMIT THE CURB |
| | APPROVAL TO THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR REVIEW, IF |
| | APPROVED THEN THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO APPLY THEIR |
| | SHOP DRAWING STAMP OF APPROVAL ON THE DOCUMENT BEFORE |
| | SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THE M1 SHEET |
| | SHOWS 5 NEW ROOF TOP A/C UNITS A REVISION TO THE |
| | ORIGINAL PERMIT. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE ACTUAL ROUGH OPENING SIZE FOR THE |
| | ROOF PENETRATIONS. NOTE ON THE S-4 SHEET INDICATES |
| | COORDINATE THE EXACT SIZE OF HOLE AND REQUIREMENTS WITH |
| | MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. THE SUBMITTAL FOR THE CURB SIZE |
| | IS UNKNOWN, NOT PROVIDED, HOW CAN THE STRUCTURAL CALCS |
| | BE ACCURATE? |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE SEA COAST ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL FOR THE |
| | MODEL/ TAG THC092 IS 2 TONS LARGER THAN SPECED IN ON |
| | M-1. PLEASE REVIEW SHEET M-1 RTU SPECIFICATIONS, UNIT |
| | SPECED IN IS A TSC072. |
| | |
| | 2A) 2ND REQUEST UNTIL THE UNKNOWNS ABOVE ARE SATISFIED |
| | THE AND DISCREPANCIES CLEARED UP THE WIND LOAD |
| | CERTIFICATION CANNOT BE APPROVED. |
| | DISCREPANCIES!!!!!!2014 FBC-B 1604.4 ANALYSIS. LOAD |
| | EFFECTS ON STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AND THEIR CONNECTIONS |
| | SHALL BE DETERMINED BY METHODS OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS |
| | THAT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT EQUILIBRIUM, GENERAL STABILITY, |
| | GEOMETRIC COMPATIBILITY AND BOTH SHORT- AND LONG-TERM |
| | MATERIAL PROPERTIES. EVERY STRUCTURE SHALL BE DESIGNED |
| | TO RESIST THE OVERTURNING EFFECTS CAUSED BY THE LATERAL |
| | FORCES SPECIFIED IN THIS CHAPTER. SEE SECTION 1609 FOR |
| | WIND LOADS? |
| | |
| | 2014 FBC-M- 301.15 WIND RESISTANCE. MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND SUPPORTS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO |
| | WIND SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO RESIST THE WIND |
| | PRESSURES DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 2B) SEMI-COMPLIED, DISCREPANCIES , AND UNKNOWN |
| | DIMENSION IN OPENINGS. |
| | IF THE ABOVE MENTIONED IS DESIGNED BY EITHER A DELEGATE |
| | ENGINEER OR MECHANICAL ENGINEER THE ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| | WILL NEED TO REVIEW THE ENGINEERED DETAILS FOR |
| | CONFORMANCE WITH THEIR OVERALL DESIGN FOR THE BUILDING. |
| | 107.3.4.1 THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA |
| | RULE 9N-3 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | ENGINEERING SUBMITTED FORM BOEDOIN HUTCHINSON A |
| | DELEGATE ENGINEER WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED TO STEPHEN |
| | H. PAGE THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, ALSO NOTE THE SUBMITTED |
| | CALCULATIONS ARE COPIES NOT SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | ORIGINALS. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER |
| | DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING |
| | FILED FOR PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND |
| | SEAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE |
| | DOCUMENT. |
| | FL ADMIN CODE 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS |
| | 3 SETS OF PLANS SUBMITTED ONLY (2) SETS OF COPIES |
| | SUBMITTED NOT (3) ORIGINALS. |
| | |
| | 3) UNTIL THE DISCREPANCIES IN THE ROOF TOP RTU?S IS |
| | SATISFIED THIS COMMENT WILL STAND. THIS BUILDING WAS |
| | DESIGNED AS A SHELL BUILDING EXEMPT FROM THE ENERGY |
| | CODE. WITH THE A/C ROOF TOP UNITS BEING ADDED TO THE |
| | SCOPE OF WORK, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING FOR THE HOOK UP |
| | OF THESE UNITS THE BUILDING NO LONGER QUALIFIES AS A |
| | SHELL BUILDING AND WILL NEED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | FOUND UNDER THE 2014 FBC-ENERGY CODE; |
| | 3A) C401.2 APPLICATION. COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS SHALL |
| | COMPLY WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | 1. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1. |
| | 2. THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS C402, C403, C404 AND |
| | C405. IN ADDITION, COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY |
| | WITH EITHER SECTION C406.2, C406.3 OR |
| | C406.4. |
| | 3. THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION C407, C402.4, C403.2, |
| | C404, C405.2, C405.3, C405.4, C405.6 AND C405.7. THE |
| | BUILDING ENERGY COST SHALL BE EQUAL |
| | TO OR LESS THAN 85 PERCENT OF THE STANDARD REFERENCE |
| | DESIGN BUILDING. |
| | |
| | NOTE ASHRAE 90 CALCS. WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE MANDATORY |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOUND ON PAGE 8 OF 13 NOT COMPLETED. TO BE |
| | CHECKED AT COMPLIANCE SUBMISSION, ALL BOXES WERE LEFT |
| | BLANK!!!!!! |
| | |
| | 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION |
| | & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
