| Date |
Text |
| 2016-03-21 09:56:31 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | 1. SEE SOILS REPORT, 6.3.1 (PAGE 9), A LINE HAS BEEN |
| | REMOVED, PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETE REPORT. |
| | |
| | 2. FBC CHAPTER 34, SEE SHEET S001, CODES REFER TO |
| | STANDARDS WITH A DIFFERENT VERSION THAN SPECIFIED IN |
| | CHAPTER 34. PLEASE REVISE. USE OF A DIFFERENT STANDARD |
| | THAN THAT OF GOVERNING CODE WOULD REQUIRE A WRITTEN |
| | ANALYSIS OF THE DIFFERENCES TO BE PRESENTED TO THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR CONSIDERATION. |
| | |
| | 3. THE PLANS SUBMITTED ARE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED. IF |
| | DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS ARE NOT PROVIDED FOR |
| | PLAN REVIEW, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS ARE PROVIDED AT THE |
| | END OF PLAN REVIEW, PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE SIGNATURE |
| | REVIEW MAY TAKE UP TO A WEEK TO COMPLETE (AFTER |
| | SUBMITTAL OF THE SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS), AFTER ALL |
| | REVIEWS HAVE PASSED. IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED THAT |
| | DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS ARE SUBMITTED AT THIS |
| | TIME FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 4. THE STRUCTURAL PAGES, ELECTRICAL PAGES, WIND TUNNEL |
| | REPORT AND PLUMBING PAGES DO NOT HAVE A TITLE BLOCK FOR |
| | THE ENGINEER WHICH IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH FS 471, |
| | FAC61G15-23.002. PLEASE SEE WWW.FBPE.ORG, LAWS AND |
| | RULES. THE TITLE BLOCK PORTION IS HIGHLIGHTED. THE |
| | TITLE BLOCK IS LACKING THE CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION, PRINTED NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE |
| | PERSON SEALING THE DOCUMENT. |
| | |
| | 5. IT APPEARS THE ELECTRICAL PAGES WERE UPLOADED TWICE; |
| | ONCE IN THE PLAN FOLDER AND ONCE IN THE SUPPORTING |
| | DOCUMENTS FOLDER. PLEASE REMOVE THE PAGES IN THE |
| | SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FOLDER OR CLARIFY THE PURPOSE OF |
| | TWO SETS OF DOCUMENTS, FBC 107. |
| | |
| | 6. SEE FLORIDA STATUTE 553.79 (7)(D); ALL PLANS FOR THE |
| | BUILDING WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY |
| | THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT |
| | THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT?S OR ENGINEER?S |
| | KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE |
| | APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE |
| | FIRESAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL |
| | AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER |
| | 633. |
| | |
| | I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS STATEMENT (ARCHITECT, |
| | ENGINEER), PLEASE REVISE PLANS TO INCLUDE OR ADVISE AS |
| | TO WHERE THIS CAN BE FOUND ON THE PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 7. PLEASE CONFIRM SCOPE OF THIS FOUNDATION PERMIT. |
| | AUGERCAST PILES AND PILE CAPS ARE INCLUDED ON THE |
| | PERMIT DESCRIPTION. WILL THE GRADE BEAMS AND FIRST LIFT |
| | OF COLUMNS BE INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF THIS PERMIT? AS |
| | THIS PROJECT HAS A TIGHT TIMELINE, CONSIDER EXPANDING |
| | THE SCOPE TO AVOID SCHEDULING ISSUES IN THE EVENT THAT |
| | THE FULL BUILDING PERMIT IS NOT ISSUED ON THE SCHEDULE |
| | ANTICIPATED. ALTERNATIVELY, THIS FOUNDATION PERMIT |
| | (CURRENTLY LIMITED TO AUGERCAST PILES AND PILE CAPS) |
| | CAN BE EXPANDED WITH A REVISION. |
| | |
| | 8. THE PLUMBING PAGES ARE MARKED ?FOR REFERENCE ONLY.? |
| | IF THE SCOPE OF THE FOUNDATION PERMIT INCLUDES COLUMNS |
| | AND GRADE BEAMS, A PLUMBING PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED AND |
| | THE PAGES SHOULD BE SIGNED AND SEALED. |
| | |
| | 9. THIS PROJECT CROSSES PROPERTY LINES. PLEASE ADVISE, |
| | WILL THE PARCELS BE UNIFIED, OR A REPLAT FILED? FBC |
| | 705.8. |
| | |
| | 10. PROVIDE A SITE PLAN WHICH SHOWS THE PROPOSED |
| | UNIFIED PARCEL, BUILDING OUTLINE, AND DISTANCE OF THE |
| | EXTERIOR WALLS TO THE PROPERTY LINE OR CENTERLINE OF |
| | PUBLIC WAY TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 705.8. |
| | |
| | 11. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SECTION 7.2.2, NOTE 18, AN |
| | NV5 SHOULD PROVIDE FULL TIME QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTION |
| | TO DOCUMENT THE EXCAVATION AND GROUTING OF EACH PILE |
| | AND TO PROVIDE, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A LICENSED OFFICE |
| | ENGINEER, ANY NECESSARY FIELD ADJUSTMENTS OF PILE TIP |
| | ELEVATIONS. DOES APPLICANT INTEND TO ACCEPT THIS |
| | RECOMMENDATION? IF NOT, WHAT OTHER PROVISIONS WILL BE |
| | MADE FOR QUALITY CONTROL AND TO ADDRESS 2014 FBC-B |
| | 1810.3.5.2.2 (SEE COMMENT BELOW). |
| | |
| | 12. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SECTION 8.0 REGARDING |
| | SOILS ENGINEER RECOMMENDATION THAT THEY REVIEW THE |
| | FOUNDATION DESIGN; HAS THIS BEEN DONE? PROVIDE A LETTER |
| | OR SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP, FBC 107. |
| | |
| | 13. SEE TEST PILE REPORT PLAN REVIEW (16020780): |
| | |
| | 1) DURING THE PROCESS OF BORING OF THE TEST PILE TO THE |
| | GROUTING PROCESS AND PLACEMENT OF REINFORCEMENT, THE |
| | GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHOULD ALSO MONITOR AND REPORT |
| | THE RESULTS OF THE TEST PILE INSTALLATION AS WELL AS |
| | LOAD TESTING. THE WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT |
| | WILL REQUIRE A SET OF BORING LOGS, PROVIDE THE |
| | THEORETICAL PILE VOLUME AS WELL AS THE ACTUAL PILE |
| | VOLUME FOR EACH TEST PILE AND TEST RESULTS OF THE 14 |
| | INCH AND 24 INCH AUGER CAST CONCRETE TEST PILE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS REFERENCED, REVIEWED BY |
| | EOR. |
| | |
| | 2) TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF PILE ALLOWABLE AXIAL CAPACITIES |
| | INDICATES THE 14 INCH PILE MINIMUM PILE TIP ELEVATION |
| | NGVD -40 FT AND THE 24 INCH PILE A -65 FT NGVD. SECTION |
| | 6.2.2 INDICATES THERE IS A THIN LAYER OF COQUINA ROCK |
| | AT THE SITE AND THE 24 INCH PILE MAY NEED TO GO AS DEEP |
| | AS 75 TO 80 FEET TO ENSURE THE 24 INCH DIAMETER PILES |
| | BE SOCKET AT LEAST 45 FEET INTO THE COQUINA. |
| | |
| | 2014 FBC-B 1810.3.5.2.2 UNCASED. CAST-IN-PLACE DEEP |
| | FOUNDATION ELEMENTS WITHOUT A PERMANENT CASING SHALL |
| | HAVE A DIAMETER OF NOT LESS THAN 12 INCHES (305 MM). |
| | THE ELEMENT LENGTH SHALL NOT EXCEED 30 TIMES THE |
| | AVERAGE DIAMETER. |
| | |
| | EXCEPTION: THE LENGTH OF THE ELEMENT IS PERMITTED TO |
| | EXCEED 30 TIMES THE DIAMETER, PROVIDED THE DESIGN AND |
| | INSTALLATION OF THE DEEP FOUNDATIONS ARE UNDER THE |
| | DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| | KNOWLEDGEABLE IN THE FIELD OF SOIL MECHANICS AND DEEP |
| | FOUNDATIONS. THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SHALL |
| | SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL STATING THAT |
| | THE ELEMENTS WERE INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 14. SEE THRESHOLD REVIEW. THIS MAY BE ADDRESSED VIA |
| | EMAIL OR THROUGH THE FRONT COUNTER. |
| | |
| | 15. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW. THIS MAY BE ADDRESSED AT ANY |
| | TIME, BUT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | 16. ADVISORY ONLY, THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES WAS SENT |
| | VIA EMAIL, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES |
| | 78-123, 78-126. |
| | |
| | THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE PROVISO THAT, |
| | WITHIN 90 DAYS OF ISSUANCE, THE APPROVAL WILL BE |
| | PROVIDED. PLEASE SEND A COPY OF THE APPROVAL WHEN |
| | AVAILABLE VIA EMAIL TO [email protected] IN ORDER TO |
| | DOCUMENT THE PERMIT FILE. |
| | |
| | 17. INCORPORATE A NOTE INTO THE PLAN REGARDING THE |
| | AMOUNT OF TIME WHICH SHOULD ELAPSE BETWEEN POURS WHEN |
| | TWO PILES ARE IN NEAR PROXIMITY, FBC 107, |
| | |
| | 18. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, |
| | 105.13 PHASED PERMIT APPROVAL. AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE |
| | APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDATIONS OR ANY OTHER PART OF A |
| | BUILDING OR STRUCTURE BEFORE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS |
| | FOR THE WHOLE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE HAVE BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED. THE HOLDER OF SUCH PERMIT FOR THE FOUNDATION |
| | OR OTHER PARTS OF A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL PROCEED |
| | AT THE HOLDER?S OWN RISK WITH THE BUILDING OPERATION |
| | AND WITHOUT ASSURANCE THAT A PERMIT FOR THE ENTIRE |
| | STRUCTURE WILL BE GRANTED. CORRECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED |
| | TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TECHNICAL CODES. THIS |
| | PROVISION IS ONLY FOR THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, ALL |
| | OTHER AGENCY APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION MUST |
| | BE SECURED PRIOR TO THIS PROVISION BEING APPLIED. |
| | |
