| Date |
Text |
| 2016-06-14 17:37:01 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) |
| | FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED |
| | PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY |
| | IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: NEED THE PALM BEACH COUNTY STAMP ON DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | 2- EXTERIOR WALL SECTION "C" ON SHEET S101: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT |
| | A)SPECIFY HOW ARE THE NEW 2 X 6 STUDS ATTACHED TO THE |
| | TOP AND TO THE BOTTOM PLATES. SEC. R601.2 OF |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: SPECIFICATIONS ON DETAIL "C" DON'T SEEM TO |
| | PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS LOAD PATH. NAILING TO THE WOOD |
| | GRAIN ON THE TOP PLATES AND TOE NAILING AT THE BOTTOM |
| | PLATE DON'T SEEM TO PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR UPLIFT LOADS. |
| | ENGINEER TO REVIEW DETAIL "C" AND PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER STATING THAT HE REVIEWED THE DETAIL AND THAT |
| | SPECIFIED CONNECTIONS ARE STRUCTURALLY ADEQUATE TO |
| | RESIST ALL LOADS. PROVIDE ENGINEER ANALYSIS SHOWING HOW |
| | PROVIDING A CONTINUOUS LOAD PATH TO RESIST ALL LOADS |
| | THE WAY IT'S SPECIFIED ON THE DETAIL. SEC. R601.2 OF |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- SHEET A300: CLARIFY HOW PROVIDING R-30 CLOSED CELL |
| | INSULATION ON 2X6 WALLS. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS |
| | SHOWING REQUIRED THICKNESS TO MEET THE R-30 VALUE. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE "TIGER |
| | FOAM" INSULATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R316 FOR FOAM PLASTIC AND TO |
| | VERIFY THE R-VALUE. IF THERE IS MORE THAN ONE TYPE OF |
| | FOAM, THEN CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC FOAM TO BE USED. |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO APPROVE IN WRITING THE EVALUATION |
| | REPORT PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL T THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) SLIDING GLASS DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. DRAWINGS |
| | SUBMITTED WITH FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL8753-R3 ARE |
| | FOR SMALL MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION. NEED DOORS WITH |
| | LARGE MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION. SEC. R301.2.1.2 OF |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. SAME PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS |
| | RE-SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) CASEMENT WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. DRAWINGS |
| | SUBMITTED WITH FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL9968-R4 ARE |
| | FOR SMALL MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION. NEED WINDOWS WITH |
| | LARGE MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION. SEC. R301.2.1.2 OF |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. SAME PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS |
| | RE-SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 5- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO APPROVE IN WRITING ABOVE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | 6- RE-SUBMITTED PACKAGE IS MISSING THE FOLLOWING |
| | DRAWINGS: COVER, A201, ID100. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE |
| | SETS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. DON'T |
| | STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO NEW SETS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
