Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 16020194
Permit Number 16020194
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2016-07-01 13:37:02****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 GOVERNING CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (FBC 2014)
  
 1-6. OK; ALSO SEE THRESHOLD AND IMPACT FEE REVIEWS.
  
 7. TWO DOCUMENTS WERE UPLOADED AS LAND AND TITLE SURVEY
 (003-01 AND 004-02) BUT BOTH DOCUMENTS ARE ONE PAGE,
 FIRST PAGE OF A TWO PAGE SURVEY. PROVIDE THE SECOND
 PAGE, FBC 107.
  
 8-10. OK
  
 11. LS0.1, A SURFACE MOUNT FIRE EXTINGUISHER IS
 DEPICTED ON THE RAMP (S2 TO BUSINESS/RESIDENTIAL) BUT
 DOES NOT APPEAR ON SHEET A2.1; THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO
 COMPLY WITH FBC 1003.3, 1012.8, FBC 5TH ED.
 ACCESSIBILITY 405.5.
  
 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE STATES THAT THIS WAS RELOCATED BUT
 A SFE IS NOW SHOWN ON THE LANDING OF THE RAMP ON LS0.1,
 BUT IS NOT ON SHEET A2.1 (AND RESPONSE LETTER APPEARS
 TO IMPLY THAT INTENT WAS TO REMOVE IT FROM THE RAMP);
 SAME COMMENTS APPLY. EITHER REMOVE OR CORRELATE WITH
 A2.1 AND PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO CLARIFY COMPLIANCE.
  
 12-16. OK
  
 17. LS 0.1, IT APPEARS THAT INTERMEDIATE HANDRAILS ARE
 REQUIRED AT THE STAIR AT DOOR 115, FBC 1012.9. REVISE
 THIS SHEET AND PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED DETAIL FOR THE
 STAIR, FBC 107.
  
 RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS WAS ADDED, BUT LS0.1
 AND A2.1 DO NOT APPEAR TO BE REVISED AT THIS LOCATION,
 PLEASE CORRELATE.
  
 18-20. OK
  
 21. LS 0.1, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY THE NUMBER OF
 OCCUPANTS EXITING THROUGH GATE 160. EXIT STAIR 4, EXIT
 STAIR 6, POOL AREA, CLUBHOUSE, 1ST FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
 LEAD TO THIS EXIT.
  
 2ND REVIEW, OCCUPANCY CALCS AND RESPONSE LETTER SHOW AN
 OCCUPANT LOAD OF 395. PLEASE REVISE; PLAN SHOWS AT
 LEAST 468 (POOL DECK 375, POOL 50, GRILL AREA 20, A3
 COVERED 23) OR CLARIFY. ALSO INCLUDE THE AREA WHICH IS
 NOT DESIGNATED ON THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN BUT IS SHOWN ON
 A2.1 AS OUTDOOR LIVING.
 LS0.1 EGRESS CAPACITY TABULATIONS INDICATE THAT THERE
 IS A 38IN EXIT IN ADDITION TO TWO 68IN EXITS. I WAS
 UNABLE TO LOCATE THE 38IN EXIT FOR THIS AREA, PLEASE
 CLARIFY OR REVISE. NOTE THAT EXITING APPEARS COMPLIANT
 WITHOUT THE THIRD EXIT.
  
 22-25. OK
  
 26. LS 0.2 AND OTHER SHEETS, A SURFACE MOUNT FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER IS SHOWN WHERE IT APPEARS TO OBSTRUCT THE
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESS AISLE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO
 SHOW THAT THE ACCESS AISLE IS NOT OBSTRUCTED.
  
 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS WAS MOVED BUT
 THIS STILL APPEARS ON LS0.2, PLEASE CHECK ALL FLOORS
 AND REVISE.
  
 27. LS 0.2, LS 0.4, UNITS A1 AND C2, TENANT / OCCUPANCY
 SEPARATION BETWEEN THE R2 UNITS AND THE A2 CORRIDOR IS
 LACKING, FBC TABLE 508.4.
  
 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS WAS PROVIDED
 BUT PLAN WAS NOT REVISED. PLEASE SEE WALL BETWEEN S2
 AND R2 ADJACENT TO STAIR 2.
  
 28. LS 0.4, THE DOORS SERVING THE NORTH ROOF DECK ARE
 TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL, FBC
 1008.1.10.
  
 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE ALSO CLARIFY COMPLIANCE WITH FBC
 1015.2.1. 11FT IS SHOWN BETWEEN THE TWO EXITS, BUT IT
 APPEARS THAT THE DIAGONAL IS GREATER THAN 33.
  
 29-30. OK
  
 31. SHEET S1 2A, SPECIFY FLOOR LOADS FOR THE ASSEMBLY
 AREAS (CLUBHOUSE ROOF DECK, GYM, EXERCISE ROOM).
  
 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER REFERS TO LS SHEETS BUT I
 WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS REVISION. PLEASE ALSO
 INCORPORATE INTO THE APPLICABLE STRUCTURAL SHEET.
  
 33-36. OK
  
 36. S6.0, WALL PRESSURES SPECIFIED AND SOME PRODUCT
 APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE CHART IS A GENERAL
 ONE, NOT SPECIFIC TO EACH OPENING. THE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS ARE NOT MARKED TO INDICATE WHICH OF THE
 OPTIONS IS PROPOSED. EITHER PROVIDE A SCHEDULE TO SHOW
 DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OPENING AND PRODUCT APPROVALS
 MARKED TO SHOW WHICH OPTION PROPOSED FOR EACH OPENING
 (OR ONE TO BE USED FOR ALL OPENINGS TO COMPLY WITH
 WORST CASE), OR THIS WILL BE A PROVISO ITEM (PROVIDE
 FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATION).
  
 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER DIRECTED ME TO THE PAGE
 WHERE FOUR PRODUCTS ARE REFERENCED. THE FOLLOWING
 ISSUES ARE NOTED:
  
 THE FIXED WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL REFERENCED ON SHEET
 A4.7 IS FOR SMALL MISSILE IMPACT; LMI REQUIRED BELOW
 30FT (LMI NOA NOT INCLUDED IN THE PRODUCTS REVIEWED,
 BUT NOA UPLOADED, PLEASE CORRELATE).
  
 THE SERIES 9500 LMI FIXED WINDOW WAS UPLOADED, BUT IS
 NOT INCLUDED IN THE PRODUCTS REVIEWED (SHEET A4.7).
  
 THE FRENCH DOOR NOA 150611.10 PROVIDED DOES NOT APPEAR
 TO INCLUDE PANIC BAR HARDWARE OPTION, SO THIS PRODUCT
 CANNOT BE USED IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS FOR ASSEMBLY
 OCCUPANCY. THIS HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN THE PROVISO LIST
 (SUBMIT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION).
  
 ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
 WORST CASE DESIGN PRESSURES. MOST OPTIONS COMPLY.
 PROVISO; COMPONENT AND CLADDING TO COMPLY WITH WORST
 CASE DESIGN PRESSURES OR SUBMIT A SCHEDULE OF
 APPLICABLE OPENINGS AND PROPOSED INSTALLATION.
  
 37. 2ND REVIEW, THE SOFFIT DETAIL LACKS A BOND BREAK
 REQUIRED (TWO LAYERS VAPOR BARRIER); PLEASE REVISE
 DETAIL ACCORDINGLY, FBC 1403.2, ASTM C926.
  
 38-40. OK
  
 41. SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING FAIR HOUSING. ALL
 COMMENTS ARE ALSO APPLICABLE FOR BUILDING REVIEW.
  
 42. REGARDING ENERGY CALCS, IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A
 47,771 SF DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE AREA ON THE ENERGY
 CALCS (CONDITIONED AREA 312,869) AND THE A SHEETS.
 NUMBER OF STORIES ON EC IS 5, NOT CONSISTENT WITH PLAN.
 THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE IS FOR VIVIANA FRANYIE, BUT THE
 PRINTED SEAL IS FOR ALEJANDRO FRANYIE (THIS APPLIES TO
 SOME OF THE FMEP SHEETS AS WELL, PLEASE CORRECT,
 FS471).
  
 43-46. OK
  
 47. SIGNED & SEALED SOILS REPORT WAS NOT UPLOADED BUT
 AN ORIGINAL WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE (ISSUED)
 VIBROFLOTATION PERMIT, SO NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS PERMIT.
  
 THE STRUCTURAL CALCS ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED AND
 SEALED; PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 48-49. OK
  
 49. PROVISO;
  
 50. ADVISORY ONLY; SOME (BUT NOT ALL) PRODUCT APPROVALS
 HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. APPLICANT MAY ELECT TO DEFER
 PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL. THEY CAN BE SUBMITTED AFTER
 PERMIT ISSUANCE, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, WITH NO
 ADDITIONAL FEES.
  
 51. SEE ROOF REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 ROOF NOAS FOR JM TPO SUBMITTED; 14-0618.03, 13-0529.02
  
 A. ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE
 ASSEMBLY PROPOSED WAS NOT SELECTED AND ENGINEERING FOR
 ENHANCED FASTENING (WOOD DECK) WAS NOT PROVIDED. IF
 THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED PRIOR TO PERMIT
 ISSUANCE, THE INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF
 ROOF SUB PERMIT SUBMITTAL. AN "N" WILL BE ENTERED FOR
 THE ROOF PLAN REVIEW.
  
 ROOF ASSEMBLIES SELECTED TO COMPLY WITH THE (VULT)
 PRESSURES SPECIFIED ON SHEET S6-1.
  
 B. SHEET S6-1, CLARIFY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE "ROOF
 MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSSURE" VS. "GROSS UPLIFT DESIGN
 PRESSURES." THE DESIGN PRESSURES TO BE UTILIZED FOR THE
 TPO ROOF IS NOT CLEAR.
  
 C. SHEET S6-1, IT APPEARS THAT ROOF PRESSURES SPECIFIED
 USE ZONE 2 PRESSURES FOR ZONE 3. THE STAIR ROOFS,
 ELEVATOR ROOFS, CANOPIES (DETAIL 1-S4.1, A SHEETS
 BUILDING SECTIONS, OTHER PLACES) DO NOT INCLUDE A 3FT
 PARAPET, FBC 1609, ASCE7 10 30.6-1 NOTE 7. SEE ALSO
 ROOF REVIEW COMMENTS. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH DESIGN
 PRESSURES ARE SPECIFIED FOR THE ROOF.
  
 D. PLAN SHEET S1.9C AND OTHER SHEETS INCLUDE AN
 INDICATOR FOR DETAIL 1 S9.1A; UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS
 SHEET (S9.1A). PLEASE PROVIDE SHEET OR REVISE DETAIL
 INDICATOR TO CORRECT LOCATION.
  
 54-56. OK
  
 RESPONSE LETTER STOPS AT COMMENT #56. AS IT IS NOT
 CLEAR WHICH OF THE ITEMS HAVE BEEN REVISED, OR WHERE,
 COMMENTS REMAIN.
  
 58. A2.1, THE DOOR FOR UNIT 140 AND OTHER UNITS ARE NOT
 LABELED, FBC 107. THE INDEX SHOWS A DOOR SCHEDULE FOR
 THE AMENITY AREA. PLEASE ADVISE AS TO WHERE THE UNIT
 ENTRY DOOR SCHEDULE IS LOCATED OR PROVIDE.
  
 59. FBC 424.1.3.1.9, 424.2.17, POOL BARRIER PROPOSED IS
 NOT CLEAR (WINDOWS LOCATED IN THE WALL WHICH SERVES AS
 THE POOL BARRIER).
  
 2ND REVIEW; A NOTE WAS ADDED TO STATE THAT ALL UNIT
 BALCONY RAILINGS ARE AT 48IN (LS0.1). PLEASE REVISE
 PLAN TO SHOW INTENT FOR POOL BARRIER FOR THE FIRST
 FLOOR WINDOWS WHICH DIRECTLY FACE THE POOL.
  
 60. SHEET A6.1, ITEM 68 SPECIFIES RIGID INSULATION, NOA
 11-0516.02; THIS IS THE NOA NUMBER FOR WATERPROOFING,
 REVISE; ALSO SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING NOA NUMBERS
 ON THE PLAN.
  
 61. PROVIDE A GRAB BAR BACKING DETAIL, FBC 107.
  
 62. FHA, NOT ALL OF THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS PROPOSED
 ARE 6FT; FOR INSTANCE, SEE UNIT S2, SHEET A4.1. SEE
 PAGE 3.10 OF THE FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL AND THE
 GUIDANCE REGARDING SLIDING GLASS PATIO DOORS (SECONDARY
 DOOR) AND REVISE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
  
 63. DETAIL 2-S4.1 GRAPHICALLY DEPICTS AN EMBEDDED STRAP
 BUT DOES NOT SPECIFY. PLEASE EITHER PROVIDE INFORMATION
 AS TO WHERE THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND OR REVISE
 PLAN TO SPECIFY CONNECTORS.
  
 64. DETAILS 1 AND 2, S4.1, PLEASE PROVIDE DIRECTION AS
 TO WHICH PLAN VIEW SHEET THE DETAIL INDICATOR FOR THESE
 DETAILS ARE LOCATED.
  
 65. FIRST FLOOR (LS 0.1 AND OTHER SHEETS), ADJACENT TO
 STAIR 3, A RAMP IS SHOWN BUT NO STAIR TO ACCESS THE
 RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR FROM THE GARAGE. IT IS SUGGESTED
 THAT AN ACCESSIBLE STAIR BE ADDED. THE RAMP ADDS
 DISTANCE TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL WHICH COULD BE A
 HARDSHIP FOR SOMEONE WHO IS DISABLED OR COMPROMISED,
 DOES NOT USE A WHEELCHAIR AND IS ABLE TO NAVIGATE A
 STAIR.
  
 66. OK
  
 NEW COMMENT:
  
 67. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATED INDEX
 SPREADSHEET TO INDICATE WHICH SHEETS CHANGED IN THIS
 AND NEXT REVIEWS. ALL SHEETS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED AT
 THIS TIME AS ALL SHEETS WERE REPLACED DUE TO DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE, ONLY SHEETS WHICH WERE AFFECTED BY THIS
 COMMENT LIST. IF PROVIDED WITH A LIST OF ALL SHEETS
 WITH CHANGES FOR THIS SUBMITTAL, THIS WILL EXPEDITE THE
 LAST REVIEW AS ALL SHEETS WILL BE CHECKED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE.
  
 THIS LIST MAY BE SENT TO ME VIA EMAIL PRIOR TO
 RESUBMITTAL AND THE SHEETS WILL BE REVIEWED IN THIS
 CYCLE.
  
 THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING PROVISOS:
  
 1. PER FS 553.79, ALL SHORING/RE-SHORE ENGINEERING IS
 TO BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD AND THREE SIGNED
 AND SEALED ORIGINAL SETS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PLAN
 REVIEW. THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING IS TO BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO INSPECTION. THE CITY
 APPROVED (CITY STAMPED) SHORING/RE-SHORE ENGINEERING IS
 TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE JOB AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION.
  
 2. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, A SHORING/RESHORE GUARD RAIL
 DETAIL IS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THIS SHOULD
 BE SUBMITTED WITH THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING.
  
 3. A REPLAT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO C.O. AS THE PROPOSED
 CONSTRUCTION CROSSES PROPERTY LINE, FBC 705.8. PROVIDE
 THE BOOK AND PAGE WHERE THIS HAS BEEN RECORDED WHEN
 AVAILABLE.
  
 4. PROVISO, ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS, FBC 5TH EDITION
 ACCESSIBILITY 207, NO METHOD SELECTED; COMPLIANCE WITH
 BOTH REQUIRED OR, IF ANY FIELD ISSUES ARISE, A REVISION
 IS REQUIRED.
  
 5. PROVISO, A SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT IS REQUIRED. PRODUCT
 APPROVALS REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO BE
 SUBMITTED WITH A PERMIT APPLICATION. CONTRACTOR IS TO
 INDICATE ASSEMBLY PROPOSED AND, IF APPLICABLE, PROVIDE
 ENGINEERING.
  
 6. PROVISO; COMPONENT AND CLADDING TO COMPLY WITH WORST
 CASE DESIGN PRESSURES OR SUBMIT AS A REVISION; PROVIDE
 A SCHEDULE OF APPLICABLE OPENINGS AND PROPOSED
 INSTALLATION.
  
 7. PROVISO; SEPARATE PERMITS (APPLICATION, PLANS, FEES,
 REVIEW) REQUIRED FOR POOL. THE PLANS HAVE BEEN MARKED
 ?VOID? AND HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED.
  
 8. PROVISO; THE FOLLOWING PRODUCT APPROVALS OR SITE
 SPECIFIC ENGINEERING ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AS A
 REVISION AND REVIEWED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION:
  
 PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 MECHANICAL LOUVERS
 WINDOWS (WITH EXCEPTION OF NOAS ALREADY SUBMITTED)
 SERIES 8000 ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL SYSTEM (15-0727.05,
 SHEET A5.5)
 EXTERIOR DOORS
 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY EXTERIOR DOORS
 GENSTORM OPTION #1 LOUVER OUTSWING STEEL DOOR, DOUBLE
 (A5.4)
 OHD
 BAR TELS FRAMELESS DOORS (A5.4)
 ALL OTHER COMPONENTS AND CLADDING NOT SUBMITTED AND
 REVIEWED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE
  
 DELEGATED ENGINEERING:
 GREEN SCREEN ALUMINUM FRAME SYSTEM
 2ND LEVEL METAL CANOPY
 TRELLIS
 SHADE STRUCTURES
 RAILINGS
 PRECAST CONCRETE (S7.0, DELEGATED ENGINEERING
 CONNECTIONS)
 PRECAST STAIRS AND LANDINGS
 AWNINGS AND CANOPIES
 OTHER DELEGATED ENGINEERING ITEMS
  
 9. PROVISO, ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS TO BE PRINTED IN AN
 EASILY LEGIBLE FORMAT (PLAN PAGES MINIMUM OF 8.5X11IN
 FULL SHEET OR, PREFERABLY 11X17).
  
 10. PROVISO, THE FOLLOWING TEST REPORTS FOR THE
 FLOORING UNDERLAYMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 INSTALLATION (INFORMATIONAL NOTE: PER S2.4, S3.1 FLOOR
 SLABS ARE 8IN, SO STC AND IIC TESTS ON AN 8IN SLAB OR
 LESS ARE ACCEPTABLE): STC (FBC 1207.2), IIC (FBC
 1207.3), ASTM E 84 (FBC 603.1).
  
 11. FS 553.79(7)(C) ALL SHORING AND RESHORING
 PROCEDURES, PLANS, AND DETAILS BE SUBMITTED TO THE
 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY FOR RECORDKEEPING. SHORING/RESHORE
 ENGINEERING IS TO BE SUBMITTED AT EACH LIFT. FAILURE TO
 SUBMIT SHORING/RESHORE PLANS TO THE BUILDING DIVISION
 FOR PLAN REVIEW AT THE TIME OF EACH LIFT MAY RESULT IN
 A STOP WORK ORDER. AS THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN PROBLEMATIC
 IN THE PAST, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A NOTE BE
 INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN.
  
 12. PROVISO, ALL DOORS AND GATES IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS
 FOR ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY SHALL HAVE PANIC DEVICES OR FIRE
 EXIT HARDWARE, FBC 1008. A REVISION INCLUDING PRODUCT
 APPROVALS WITH PANIC DEVICES PROPOSED IS TO BE
 SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved