Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 16020194
Permit Number 16020194
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2016-03-10 16:43:50****CORRECTIONS****
 REVISED 3/25/16
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 GOVERNING CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (FBC 2014)
  
 1. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.71, THIS BUILDING QUALIFIES AS A
 THRESHOLD BUILDING; ANY BUILDING WHICH IS GREATER THAN
 (3) STORIES OR 50 FT. IN HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN
 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS DEFINED IN THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SF IN AREA
 AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 PERSONS.
  
 2. AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING, THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
  
 A. THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN; FS 553.79(5)(A), 2010
 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION 109.3.6.1. THE
 ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO
 PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING
 PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY
 THE ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL
 INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY
 THE ENFORCING AGENCY BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING
 PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING.
 THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO
 PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO
 THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS.
  
 B. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: WPB AMENDMENT 109.3.6.2 W.P.B.
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUESTS FOR THRESHOLD
 BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FS
 553.79(5)(A) TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY
 THIS CODE. THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION FORMS ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE FILED OUT BY ALL PARTIES, NOTARIZED AND RETURNED
 TO THIS OFFICE, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PERMIT
 ISSUANCE. CONTACT KEN CONRAD, MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL
 INSPECTOR PROGRAM, AT 561-805-6666 FOR ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION.
 FORMS WERE SENT TO: [email protected] ON 3/1/16.
  
 C. SPECIAL INSPECTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A RESUME' OF
 INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECTS FOR REVIEW
 BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE. AFTER THE
 RESUME' IS REVIEWED, AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED.
 UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED
 FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE
 RESUME' IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD (AND COPY
 SAMANTHA HILL), 561-805-6666, [email protected],
 [email protected]
  
 ALL PROSPECTIVE INSPECTORS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE
 CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR AND ALL ARE REQUIRED TO SIGN
 THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT.
  
 D. CONTRACTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A JOB SUMMARY OR HISTORY
 FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED TO
 KEN CONRAD, (PLEASE COPY SAMANTHA HILL) VIA E-MAIL
 ([email protected], [email protected]).
  
 3. ADVISORY ONLY; PER FS 553.79, ALL SHORING/RE-SHORE
 ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD AND
 THREE SIGNED AND SEALED ORIGINAL SETS ARE TO BE
 SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THE SHORING/RESHORE
 ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO
 INSPECTION. THE CITY APPROVED (CITY STAMPED)
 SHORING/RE-SHORE ENGINEERING IS TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE
 JOB AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION.
  
 4. ADVISORY ONLY; PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, A
 SHORING/RESHORE GUARD RAIL DETAIL IS TO BE SUBMITTED
 FOR PLAN REVIEW. THIS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED WITH THE
 SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING.
  
 5. PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY
 PALM BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT
 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION.
  
 6. THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION CROSSES PROPERTY LINE, FBC
 705.8. PLEASE ADVISE; HAS A REPLAT BEEN FILED?
  
 7. TWO DOCUMENTS WERE UPLOADED AS LAND AND TITLE SURVEY
 (003-01 AND 004-02) BUT BOTH DOCUMENTS ARE ONE PAGE,
 FIRST PAGE OF A TWO PAGE SURVEY. PROVIDE THE SECOND
 PAGE, FBC 107.
  
 8. ADVISORY ONLY; DEMOLITION OF EACH BUILDING REQUIRES
 A SEPARATE PERMIT. PLEASE SEE THE DEMOLITION PERMIT
 APPLICATION CHECKLIST ON OUR WEBSITE: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DE
 PARTMENTS/DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES/CONSTRUCTION/PERMITS
  
 9. DOOR 101 TO RESIDENTIAL LOBBY 143, PLEASE REVISE
 PLAN TO SHOW MANEUVERING CLEARANCE (18IN MINIMUM), PULL
 SIDE, SEE ANSI 117.1 FIG.B4.13.5 (PER FAIR HOUSING
 ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES, REQUIREMENT 3, USABLE DOORS).
  
 10. STAIR 2, A2.1 AND LS 0.1, DOES NOT HAVE A DOOR,
 WEST SIDE, SEE FBC 1022.3.1.
  
 11. LS0.1, A SURFACE MOUNT FIRE EXTINGUISHER IS
 DEPICTED ON THE RAMP (S2 TO BUSINESS/RESIDENTIAL) BUT
 DOES NOT APPEAR ON SHEET A2.1; THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO
 COMPLY WITH FBC 1003.3, 1012.8, FBC 5TH ED.
 ACCESSIBILITY 405.5.
  
 12. FIRST FLOOR, IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH PARKING SPACES
 SERVE THE BUSINESS OCCUPANCY AND RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY,
 REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 5TH
 EDITION ACCESSIBILITY TABLE 208.2, FHA REQUIREMENT 2.
 PROVIDE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES (FOR
 BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL), NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES
 (FOR BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL), SHEET GA2.1. NOTE THAT
 ALL OF THE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE ON THE
 PUBLIC SIDE OF THE VEHICLE BARRIER GATE ARM AS WELL AS
 SEVERAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES. MORE INFORMATION REGARDING
 PARKING FOR RESIDENTS AND BUSINESS VISITORS IS NEEDED.
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS.
  
 13. GA PAGES, FAIR HOUSING ACT REQUIREMENT 2,
 ACCESSIBLE AND USABLE COMMON USE AREA, STATES THAT THE
 BUILDING BE DESIGNED SO THAT THE PUBLIC AND COMMON USE
 AREAS ARE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO AND USABLE BY
 HANDICAPPED PERSONS. NONE OF THE ACCESSIBLE SPACES
 INCLUDE A CHARGING STATION, AND NONE OF THE CHARGING
 STATION SPACES INCLUDE AN ACCESS AISLE; PLEASE REVISE
 TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 14. FBC 5TH EDITION ACCESSIBILITY 207, REVISE PLAN TO
 STATE WHICH METHOD OF COMPLIANCE IS ELECTED FOR
 ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS (OFFICE SPACE).
  
 15. LS0.1, NOTE UNDER PARKING GARAGE (MECHANICALLY
 VENTILATED) STATES "AREA OF REFUGED #1", PLEASE
 CLARIFY.
  
 16. LS 0.1, REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE GRILL AREA OCCUPANT
 LOAD, FBC 1004.
  
 17. LS 0.1, IT APPEARS THAT INTERMEDIATE HANDRAILS ARE
 REQUIRED AT THE STAIR AT DOOR 115, FBC 1012.9. REVISE
 THIS SHEET AND PROVIDE A DIMENSIONED DETAIL FOR THE
 STAIR, FBC 107.
  
 18. LS 0.1, THE HANDRAIL FOR THE RAMP IS SHOWN
 GRAPHICALLY AS A PROTRUSION INTO THE PATH OF TRAVEL.
  
 19. LS 0.1, THE CLUBHOUSE DOORS 170 AT THE VESTIBULE
 ARE DOUBLE DOORS, BUT GATE 160 IS 3FT; FBC 1005.4. SEE
 ALSO FBC 1008.2; GATES USED AS A COMPONENT IN A MEANS
 OF EGRESS SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS
 FOR DOORS.
  
 20. LS 0.1, REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE SIDEWALK WIDTH
 FROM GATE 160 TO THE PUBLIC WAY, FBC 1005.4.
  
 21. LS 0.1, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY THE NUMBER OF
 OCCUPANTS EXITING THROUGH GATE 160. EXIT STAIR 4, EXIT
 STAIR 6, POOL AREA, CLUBHOUSE, 1ST FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
 LEAD TO THIS EXIT.
  
 22. LS 0.1, EXIT STRATEGY FOR POOL DECK AMENITY AREA
 AND CLUBHOUSE IS NOT CLEAR. EGRESS CAPACITY TABULATIONS
 DOES NOT INCLUDE POOL DECK AREAS; REVISE TO INCLUDE.
  
 23. LS 0.1, TOTAL OCCUPANTS IN THE POOL AREA IS 414
 (NOT INCLUDING THE GRILL AREA), WHICH REQUIRES 82.8IN
 OF EGRESS WIDTH, 1005.3.2; 68IN PROVIDED. SEE ALSO FBC
 1005.5 (REGARDING LOSS OF ONE EXIT); IT APPEARS THAT
 BOTH GATES (160, 161) ARE REQUIRED TO BE WIDER.
  
 24. LS 0.1, WILL RESIDENTS HAVE ACCESS FROM THE STREET
 SIDE OF GATE 160? THIS GATE LACKS THE MANEUVERING
 CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY ANSI 117.1 (FHA), 18IN PULL SIDE,
 ANSI 117.1 FIG.B4.13.5.
  
 25. LS 0.1, IT IS NOT CLEAR IF GATE 160A HAS THE
 MANEUVERING CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY ANSI 117.1 (FHA),
 18IN PULL SIDE, ANSI 117.1 FIG.B4.13.5. REVISE PLAN TO
 CLARIFY.
  
 26. LS 0.2 AND OTHER SHEETS, A SURFACE MOUNT FIRE
 EXTINGUISHER IS SHOWN WHERE IT APPEARS TO OBSTRUCT THE
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESS AISLE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO
 SHOW THAT THE ACCESS AISLE IS NOT OBSTRUCTED.
  
 27. LS 0.2, LS 0.4, UNITS A1 AND C2, TENANT / OCCUPANCY
 SEPARATION BETWEEN THE R2 UNITS AND THE A2 CORRIDOR IS
 LACKING, FBC TABLE 508.4.
  
 28. LS 0.4, THE DOORS SERVING THE NORTH ROOF DECK ARE
 TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL, FBC
 1008.1.10.
  
 29. LS 0.4 IS LABELED LEVELS 4 THROUGH 7, BUT THE 4TH
 FLOOR IS NOT THE SAME AS FLOORS 5 THROUGH 7, PLEASE
 CORRELATE.
  
 30. LS 0.5, UNIT C1 TO CORRIDOR LACKS THE 1 HOUR RATING
 REQUIRED BY FBC 1018, PLEASE REVISE.
  
 31. SHEET S1 2A, SPECIFY FLOOR LOADS FOR THE ASSEMBLY
 AREAS (CLUBHOUSE ROOF DECK, GYM, EXERCISE ROOM).
  
 33. SHEET A2.9 SPECS MIAMI DADE NOAS 14-0618.03,
 13-0529.02 (JM TPO) ROOF SYSTEM. ADVISORY ONLY; A
 SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO A ROOFING PRODUCT WILL REQUIRE A
 REVISION IF A DIFFERENT PRODUCT IS SELECTED AT TIME OF
 INSTALLATION. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT, IF UNSURE OF
 FINAL PRODUCT TO BE INSTALLED, REFERENCES ARE LEFT OFF
 OF THE PLAN AND PRODUCT APPROVALS (REVIEWED BY DESIGNER
 OF RECORD) SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THIS
 COMMENT DOES NOT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED SUBJECT TO
 DESIGNER?S DISCRETION.
  
 34. ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE
 ASSEMBLY PROPOSED WAS NOT SELECTED AND ENGINEERING FOR
 ENHANCED FASTENING WAS NOT PROVIDED. IF THIS
 INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED AT THIS TIME, THE
 INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF ROOF SUB PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL.
  
 35. DETAIL 9-A2.9 SPECIFIES PLYWOOD SHEATHING; 1-S4.1
 SPECS WOOD FRAMED CANOPY (ALSO OTHER DETAILS THROUGH
 PLANS). PLEASE SEE FBC 603 AND REVISE.
  
 36. S6.0, WALL PRESSURES SPECIFIED AND SOME PRODUCT
 APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE CHART IS A GENERAL
 ONE, NOT SPECIFIC TO EACH OPENING. THE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS ARE NOT MARKED TO INDICATE WHICH OF THE
 OPTIONS IS PROPOSED. EITHER PROVIDE A SCHEDULE TO SHOW
 DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OPENING AND PRODUCT APPROVALS
 MARKED TO SHOW WHICH OPTION PROPOSED FOR EACH OPENING
 (OR ONE TO BE USED FOR ALL OPENINGS TO COMPLY WITH
 WORST CASE), OR THIS WILL BE A PROVISO ITEM (PROVIDE
 FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATION).
  
 37. DETAIL 1-S4.1, PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE SOFFIT (OR
 ADVISE AS TO WHERE THIS INFORMATION IS LOCATED). PLAN
 STATES ?STUCCO & OTHER FINISHES, REF. ARCHITECTURAL.?
  
 38. SHEET S1.9A IS INCORRECTLY NAMED AS 8TH FLOOR
 PARTIAL PLAN (BUT IS A PARTIAL ROOF PLAN), PLEASE
 ADDRESS.
  
 39. SHEET S6.1 STATES THAT PARAPET PRESSURES ARE BASED
 ON A SOLID PARAPET WITH NO INTERNAL PRESSURE AND THAT
 INTERNAL PRESSURE MAY NEED TO BE ADDED. THE PARAPETS
 SHOWN ON S4.1 ARE WOOD FRAME. IT APPEARS THAT SOME OF
 THE PARAPETS ARE NOT SOLID. PLEASE INCLUDE PARAPET
 DESIGN PRESSURES FOR FRAME PARAPETS.
  
 40. DETAIL 6-4.0, 1-S7.0 SPECIFIES A LINTEL, BUT I WAS
 UNABLE TO LOCATE A LINTEL SCHEDULE, FBC 16, FBC 107,
 PLEASE DIRECT OR REVISE TO INCLUDE LINTEL
 SPECIFICATION.
  
 41. SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING FAIR HOUSING. ALL
 COMMENTS ARE ALSO APPLICABLE FOR BUILDING REVIEW.
  
 42. SEE MECHANICAL COMMENTS REGARDING ENERGY CALCS. ALL
 COMMENTS ARE ALSO APPLICABLE FOR BUILDING REVIEW.
  
 43. SHEET LS 0.1 STATES THAT STAIRS ARE PRESSURIZED BUT
 I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE STAIR PRESSURIZATION DETAILS,
 PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 44. A5.3.1, ITEM 22, WOOD COMPOSITE PANELS ON METAL
 CHANNELS, PLEASE ADVISE; IS THIS APPLICABLE FOR THIS
 JOB, AND WHERE? FBC 603.
  
 45. A5.4, SEE FBC TABLE 716.5, DOORS 106, 106A ARE
 REQUIRED TO HAVE A 1.5 HR RATING AS THEY ARE LOCATED IN
 A 2 HOUR WALL, 45 MINUTES SPECIFIED. DOOR 110 ON THE
 PLAN IS DEPICTED IN A 1 HOUR WALL, BUT THE DOOR
 SCHEDULE DOES NOT SPECIFY A FIRE RATING. CHECK ALL AND
 REVISE AS NECESSARY PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL.
  
 46. FBC 501.2, ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION REQUIRED.
  
 47. THE SOILS REPORT IS NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. THE
 REPORT ALSO LACKS THE ENGINEERING COMPANY CERTIFICATE
 OF AUTHORIZATION ON THE DOCUMENT. PLEASE REVISE TO
 INCLUDE. IF THE ENGINEER (RAMAKUMAR V. VEDULA, PE) HAS
 A DIGITAL SIGNATURE, PLEASE PROVIDE A DIGITALLY SIGNED
 SOILS REPORT. IF THE ENGINEER DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE, PLEASE PROVIDE AN ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED
 SOILS REPORT. FS471, FAC61G15.
  
 THE STRUCTURAL CALCS ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED; PLEASE
 ADDRESS.
  
 48. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF
 RECORD, FBC 107. IF THE DESIGNER DOES NOT HAVE A
 REFERENCE IN THE PLAN TO A SPECIFIC PRODUCT, A SHOP
 DRAWING REVIEW STAMP ON EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL OR A
 LETTER IS REQUIRED. THE ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS AND SOME
 WINDOWS AND DOORS (A4.7) ARE SPECIFICALLY REFERENCED IN
 THE PLAN SO DO NOT REQUIRE DOR REVIEW STAMP. FOR ALL
 OTHER ITEMS, PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF DOR REVIEW.
  
 49. NOA 14-0923.10 (AND OTHER PRODUCT APPROVALS) WERE
 PRINTED AND UPLOADED WITH THE DRAWING PAGES REDUCED TO
 HALF SIZE. THIS RESULTS IN ILLEGIBLE PRODUCT APPROVALS
 WHEN PRINTED. PRODUCT APPROVALS IN THE FIELD ARE
 REQUIRED FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES. PLEASE REPRINT THE
 DRAWING PAGES IN LANDSCAPE ORIENTATION AND UPLOAD. THE
 PAGES ON THE MIAMI DADE WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO BE
 PRINTED 11X17, SO THE PAGES PROVIDED ARE 25% OF THE
 INTENDED SIZE. CHECK ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AND UPLOAD
 AS NEEDED. PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION.
  
 50. ADVISORY ONLY; SOME (BUT NOT ALL) PRODUCT APPROVALS
 HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. APPLICANT MAY ELECT TO DEFER
 PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL. THEY CAN BE SUBMITTED AFTER
 PERMIT ISSUANCE, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, WITH NO
 ADDITIONAL FEES.
  
 51. SEE ROOF REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 ROOF NOAS FOR JM TPO SUBMITTED; 14-0618.03, 13-0529.02
  
 A. ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE
 ASSEMBLY PROPOSED WAS NOT SELECTED AND ENGINEERING FOR
 ENHANCED FASTENING (WOOD DECK) WAS NOT PROVIDED. IF
 THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED PRIOR TO PERMIT
 ISSUANCE, THE INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF
 ROOF SUB PERMIT SUBMITTAL. AN "N" WILL BE ENTERED FOR
 THE ROOF PLAN REVIEW.
  
 ROOF ASSEMBLIES SELECTED TO COMPLY WITH THE (VULT)
 PRESSURES SPECIFIED ON SHEET S6-1.
  
 B. SHEET S6-1, CLARIFY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE "ROOF
 MEMBRANE DESIGN PRESSSURE" VS. "GROSS UPLIFT DESIGN
 PRESSURES." THE DESIGN PRESSURES TO BE UTILIZED FOR THE
 TPO ROOF IS NOT CLEAR.
  
 C. SHEET S6-1, IT APPEARS THAT ROOF PRESSURES SPECIFIED
 USE ZONE 2 PRESSURES FOR ZONE 3. THE STAIR ROOFS,
 ELEVATOR ROOFS, CANOPIES (DETAIL 1-S4.1, A SHEETS
 BUILDING SECTIONS, OTHER PLACES) DO NOT INCLUDE A 3FT
 PARAPET, FBC 1609, ASCE7 10 30.6-1 NOTE 7. SEE ALSO
 ROOF REVIEW COMMENTS. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH DESIGN
 PRESSURES ARE SPECIFIED FOR THE ROOF.
  
 D. PLAN SHEET S1.9C AND OTHER SHEETS INCLUDE AN
 INDICATOR FOR DETAIL 1 S9.1A; UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS
 SHEET (S9.1A). PLEASE PROVIDE SHEET OR REVISE DETAIL
 INDICATOR TO CORRECT LOCATION.
  
  
 52. ADVISORY ONLY, THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES WAS SENT
 VIA EMAIL, CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES
 78-123, 78-126.
  
 THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE PROVISO THAT,
 WITHIN 90 DAYS OF ISSUANCE, THE APPROVAL WILL BE
 PROVIDED. PLEASE SEND A COPY OF THE APPROVAL WHEN
 AVAILABLE VIA EMAIL TO [email protected] IN ORDER TO
 DOCUMENT THE PERMIT FILE.
  
 PLEASE VERIFY THAT APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THE
 REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
 53. PROVISO; SEPARATE PERMITS (APPLICATION, PLANS,
 FEES, REVIEW) REQUIRED FOR POOL. THE PLANS HAVE BEEN
 MARKED ?VOID? AND HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED.
  
 54. PROVISO; THE FOLLOWING PRODUCT APPROVALS OR SITE
 SPECIFIC ENGINEERING ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND
 REVIEWED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION:
  
 MECHANICAL LOUVERS
 WINDOWS
 SERIES 8000 ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL SYSTEM (15-0727.05,
 SHEET A5.5)
 DOORS
 GENSTORM OPTION #1 LOUVER OUTSWING STEEL DOOR, DOUBLE
 (A5.4)
 OHD
 BAR TELS FRAMELESS DOORS (A5.4)
 ALL OTHER COMPONENTS AND CLADDING NOT SUBMITTED AND
 REVIEWED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE
  
 GREEN SCREEN ALUMINUM FRAME SYSTEM
 2ND LEVEL METAL CANOPY
 TRELLIS
 SHADE STRUCTURES
 RAILINGS
 PRECAST CONCRETE (S7.0, DELEGATED ENGINEERING
 CONNECTIONS)
 PRECAST STAIRS AND LANDINGS
 AWNINGS AND CANOPIES
 OTHER DELEGATED ENGINEERING ITEMS
  
 55. PROVISO, THE FOLLOWING TEST REPORTS FOR THE
 FLOORING UNDERLAYMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 INSTALLATION (INFORMATIONAL NOTE: PER S2.4, S3.1 FLOOR
 SLABS ARE 8IN, SO STC AND IIC TESTS ON AN 8IN SLAB OR
 LESS ARE ACCEPTABLE): STC (FBC 1207.2), IIC (FBC
 1207.3), ASTM E 84 (FBC 603.1).
  
 56. ADVISORY ONLY, FS 553.79(7)(C) ALL SHORING AND
 RESHORING PROCEDURES, PLANS, AND DETAILS BE SUBMITTED
 TO THE ENFORCEMENT AGENCY FOR RECORDKEEPING.
 SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING IS TO BE SUBMITTED AT EACH
 LIFT. FAILURE TO SUBMIT SHORING/RESHORE PLANS TO THE
 BUILDING DIVISION FOR PLAN REVIEW AT THE TIME OF EACH
 LIFT MAY RESULT IN A STOP WORK ORDER. AS THIS ISSUE HAS
 BEEN PROBLEMATIC IN THE PAST, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A
 NOTE BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN.
  
 57. ADVISORY ONLY, WINDOW AND DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS
 SPECIFIED ON SHEET A4.7:
 NOAS 15-0611.10, 15-0629.01, 13-0617.28, 14092309.09
 SPECIFIED. CHANGES FROM THE WINDOW AND DOORS SPECIFIED
 WILL REQUIRE A REVISION (REVISED PLAN SHEET, NEW
 PRODUCT APPROVALS).
  
 58. A2.1, THE DOOR FOR UNIT 140 AND OTHER UNITS ARE NOT
 LABELED, FBC 107. THE INDEX SHOWS A DOOR SCHEDULE FOR
 THE AMENITY AREA. PLEASE ADVISE AS TO WHERE THE UNIT
 ENTRY DOOR SCHEDULE IS LOCATED OR PROVIDE.
  
 59. FBC 424.1.3.1.9, 424.2.17, POOL BARRIER PROPOSED IS
 NOT CLEAR (WINDOWS LOCATED IN THE WALL WHICH SERVES AS
 THE POOL BARRIER).
  
 60. SHEET A6.1, ITEM 68 SPECIFIES RIGID INSULATION, NOA
 11-0516.02; THIS IS THE NOA NUMBER FOR WATERPROOFING,
 REVISE; ALSO SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING NOA NUMBERS
 ON THE PLAN.
  
 61. PROVIDE A GRAB BAR BACKING DETAIL, FBC 107.
  
 62. FHA, NOT ALL OF THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS PROPOSED
 ARE 6FT; FOR INSTANCE, SEE UNIT S2, SHEET A4.1. SEE
 PAGE 3.10 OF THE FAIR HOUSING ACT DESIGN MANUAL AND THE
 GUIDANCE REGARDING SLIDING GLASS PATIO DOORS (SECONDARY
 DOOR) AND REVISE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
  
  
 63. DETAIL 2-S4.1 GRAPHICALLY DEPICTS AN EMBEDDED STRAP
 BUT DOES NOT SPECIFY. PLEASE EITHER PROVIDE INFORMATION
 AS TO WHERE THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND OR REVISE
 PLAN TO SPECIFY CONNECTORS.
  
 64. DETAILS 1 AND 2, S4.1, PLEASE PROVIDE DIRECTION AS
 TO WHICH PLAN VIEW SHEET THE DETAIL INDICATOR FOR THESE
 DETAILS ARE LOCATED.
  
 65. FIRST FLOOR (LS 0.1 AND OTHER SHEETS), ADJACENT TO
 STAIR 3, A RAMP IS SHOWN BUT NO STAIR TO ACCESS THE
 RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR FROM THE GARAGE. IT IS SUGGESTED
 THAT AN ACCESSIBLE STAIR BE ADDED. THE RAMP ADDS
 DISTANCE TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL WHICH COULD BE A
 HARDSHIP FOR SOMEONE WHO IS DISABLED OR COMPROMISED,
 DOES NOT USE A WHEELCHAIR AND IS ABLE TO NAVIGATE A
 STAIR.
  
 66. SEE THE ROOF REVIEW:
  
 ROOF NOAS FOR JM TPO SUBMITTED; 14-0618.03, 13-0529.02
  
 A. ROOF PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THE
 ASSEMBLY PROPOSED WAS NOT SELECTED AND ENGINEERING FOR
 ENHANCED FASTENING (WOOD DECK) WAS NOT PROVIDED. IF
 THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED PRIOR TO PERMIT
 ISSUANCE, THE INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF
 ROOF SUB PERMIT SUBMITTAL. AN "N" WILL BE ENTERED FOR
 THE ROOF PLAN REVIEW.
  
 ROOF ASSEMBLIES SELECTED TO COMPLY WITH THE (VULT)
 PRESSURES SPECIFIED ON SHEET S6-1.
  
 B. SHEET S6-1, CLARIFY PURPOSE OF "ROOF MEMBRANE DESIGN
 PRESSSURE" VS. "GROSS UPLIFT DESIGN PRESSURES." THE
 DESIGN PRESSURES TO BE UTILIZED FOR THE TPO ROOF IS NOT
 CLEAR.
  
 C. SHEET S6-1, ROOF PRESSURES SPECIFIED USE ZONE 2
 PRESSURES FOR ZONE 3. IT APPEARS THAT THE STAIR ROOF,
 ELEVATOR ROOF DO NOT INCLUDE A 3FT PARAPET, FBC 1609,
 ASCE7 10 30.6-1 NOTE 7.
  
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved