| Plan Review Notes For Permit 16020141 |
| Permit Number |
16020141 |
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2016-02-10 11:36:31 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SHEET A 1 - THE CORRIDOR WALLS APPEAR TO BE 1 HOUR | | | FIRE RATED. THE NEW WALL, W2, DOES NOT HAVE A RATING. | | | THE NEW WALL SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE | | | EXISTING CORRIDOR WALLS; 1 HOUR. | | | | | | 2. SHEET A 1 - DOOR 02 IS LOCATED WITHIN W2 IS REQUIRED | | | TO BE A FIRE RATED WALL. THE DOOR AND DOOR ASSEMBLY | | | SHALL BE FIRE RATED TO MATCH THE WALL. | | | | | | 3. SHEET A 1 - THERE IS A WALL TYPE IN THE CORNER OF | | | THE EXHAUST ROOM INDICATED AS W1A, THERE IS NO DESIGN | | | DETAIL CALL-OUT FOR THAT WALL TYPE. | | | | | | 4. SHEET A 1 - THE BACK WALL OF THE EXHAUST ROOM | | | ADDITION IS INDICATED AS W3, HOWEVERM THE EXISTING WALL | | | TYPE IS NOT INDICATED. BASED ON THE EXISTING WALL TYPE | | | DOES THE ADDITIONAL WAAL TYPE REQUIRE IT TO BE SEALED | | | AS ALL THE OTHE OTHER WALL TYPES WITHIN THAT ROOM? | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE A NOTE INDICATING THAT FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | FIRE ALARM WORK SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
