| Date |
Text |
| 2016-02-10 10:29:41 | 2ND REVIEW |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS RESTATED |
| | |
| | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, |
| | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: |
| | |
| | THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED |
| | AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE |
| | PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE |
| | INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | 1. THERE IS AN INCORECT REFERENCE TO THE FIRE CODE ON |
| | THE SUBMITTED PLANS. HOWEVER, IT DOES NPOT APPEAR TO |
| | NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE SUBMITTAL. A MORE DETAILED REVIEW |
| | MAY BE NECESSARY. |
| | |
| | THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | 5TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE INCLUDING |
| | THE 2012 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 AND ALL OTHER |
| | APPLICABLE CODES OR STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 2. THE NATURE OF THE REMODEL REQUIRES AN EVALUATION OF |
| | THE FIRE ALARM AND SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR CODE COVERAGE |
| | AND COMPLIANCE. ANY REMOVAL AND/OR CONSTRUCTION OF |
| | WALLS REQUIRE AN EVALUATION. |
| | |
| | ANY AND ALL WORK ON THE FIRE ALARM AND FIRE SPRINKLER |
| | SYSTEMS SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND |
| | BY CERTIFIED LIFE SAFETY CONTRACTORS. |
| | ANY TIME THAT WORK ON THE LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS, |
| | SPRINKLER AND/OR FIRE ALARM, EXCEEDS 4 HOURS, A FIRE |
| | WATCH SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL FULL |
| | AND COMPLETE PROTECTION IS RETURNED. |
| | |
