| Date |
Text |
| 2018-06-15 12:36:12 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET A 1.1 - THE DOUBLE WALL SEPARATING THE |
| | EXISTING OCCUPANY DOES NOT INDICATE A FIRE RATING OR |
| | LISTING. IS IT THE INTENT TO HAVE THIS WALL NONRATED? |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 6 |
| | |
| | 6.1.14.4 SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES. (SEE ALSO 6.1.14.1.2.) |
| | 6.1.14.4.1 WHERE SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES ARE PROVIDED, |
| | EACH PART OF THE |
| | BUILDING COMPRISING A DISTINCT OCCUPANCY, AS DESCRIBED |
| | IN THIS CHAPTER, |
| | SHALL BE COMPLETELY SEPARATED FROM OTHER OCCUPANCIES BY |
| | FIRE-RESISTIVE |
| | ASSEMBLIES, AS SPECIFIED IN 6.1.14.4.2, 6.1.14.4.3, |
| | TABLE 6.1.14.4.1(A), |
| | AND TABLE 6.1.14.4.1(B), UNLESS SEPARATION IS PROVIDED |
| | BY APPROVED |
| | EXISTING SEPARATIONS OR AS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY |
| | 6.1.14.4.6. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT OR PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION WITH |
| | SPECIFIC CODE REFERENCES. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET A 1.1 - TWO SETS OF DOUBLE DOORS ARE INDICATED |
| | ON THE OTHER EXISTING OCCUPANCY THAT DOES NOT INDICATE |
| | A FIRE RATING. IS IT THE INTENT TO CONNECT THESE SPACES |
| | AS ONE OCCUPANCY? IS IT THE INTENT TO SEPARATED THESE |
| | TWO SPACES AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE? IF FUTURE |
| | SEPARATION IS INTEND, THIS WALL SHOULD CARRY A FIRE |
| | RATING. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
