| Date |
Text |
| 2016-01-06 08:54:33 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | W. P. B. REVISION: 15120207 |
| | W. P. B. PERMIT: 14050111 |
| | ADD: 600 OKEECHOBEE BLVD. |
| | CONT: COASTAL |
| | TEL: |
| | E-MAIL: |
| | |
| | 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2010 WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| | ADMINISTRATION |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW |
| | DATE: WED. JAN. 06/ 2016 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW SHEET 0212-A2.02 REV. # 14.5 |
| | SHOWS TWO AREAS WHERE FENCING AND GATES HAVE BEEN ADDED |
| | TO WHAT APPEARS TO SEPARATE THE POOL AREA FROM THE |
| | HOTEL. THE CODE SECTION SITED ON THIS SHEET 2010 FBC-B |
| | 1021.1 EXCEPTION # 6. THIS EXCEPTION DOES NOT TAKE INTO |
| | ACCOUNT THAT THE FENCE AND GATE SYSTEM ON THE EAST SIDE |
| | OF THE POOL REQUIRE RE-ENTRY INTO THE BUILDING IF THESE |
| | GATES ARE BEING CONSIDERED PART OF THE EGRESS. PLEASE |
| | REVIEW 2010 FBC-B 1027.1 |
| | AND EXCEPTIONS. THE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW RE-ENTRY AS PART |
| | OF THE MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | |
| | THIS LEAVES THE CONNECTOR PASSAGEWAY TO THE SOUTHWEST |
| | CORNER OF THE LOT AND THE FENCE AND GATE SYSTEM TO THE |
| | NORTHWEST AS THE 2 MEANS OF EGRESSUNDER SECTION FBC-B |
| | 1021.1 EXCEPTION # 6. |
| | |
| | 1A) IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER THE EGRESS GATE SYSTEM |
| | NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH (2) REQUIREMENTS IN THE CODE, THEY |
| | ARE EQUALLY IMPORTANT AND COMPLIANCE WITH BOTH SECTIONS |
| | HAS TO BE ACHIVED; |
| | 2010 FBC-B 424.1.3.1.9 A SELF CLOSING, SELF- LATCHING |
| | LOCKABLE GATES OF 48 INCHES MINIMAL HEIGHT FROM THE |
| | FLOOR OR GROUND WITH THE LATCH LOCATED A MINMUM OF 54 |
| | INCHES FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE GATE OR AT LEAST 3 INCHES |
| | BELOW THE TOP OF THE GATE ON THE POOL SIDE. GATES SHALL |
| | OPEN OUTWARD AWAY FROM THE POOL. |
| | |
| | 1B) THE OTHER ISSUE IS WITH SEECTION 2010 FBC-B |
| | 1008.1.10 THE GATES WILL ALSO REQUIRE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE 2010 FBC-B SECTION 1008.1.10 PANIC HARDWARE AND OR |
| | FIRE HARDWARE. WHEN THERE WAS A FENCED IN AREA AROUND |
| | THE POOL THIS ISSUE CAME UP AND WAS BROUGHT TO THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL ROBERT BROWN WHICH WAS THE MOST |
| | RESTRICTIVE AND HAD TO COMPLY. ROBERTS DECISSION WAS |
| | BOTH CODE SECTIONS HAD TO HAVE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 2) IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER WHERE EXITING OCCURS THROUGH |
| | THE CONNECTOR PLEASE SHOW HOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2 |
| | ABOVE CODE SECTIONS WILL BE ACHIEVED. |
| | |
| | 3) WITH THE OTHER DOORS THAT SURROUND THE POOL THAT ARE |
| | NOT DESIGNATED AS EGRESS DOORS HOW WILL COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | 424,1,3,1,9 BE ACHIEVED. |
| | 3A) THE DOORS WILL NEED TO SWING OUTWARD AWAY FROM THE |
| | POOL. |
| | 3B) SELF LATCHING, SELF LOCKING AND HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE LATCH. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
