| Date |
Text |
| 2016-01-14 16:01:56 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT #15100707 |
| | 01/14/16 |
| | |
| | COMMENTS #1, 2, AND 4 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW STILL EXIST. |
| | I AM HAVE ATTACHED THEM BELOW. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE M-1 |
| | MECHANICAL SHEETS WERE NOT INSERTED INTO THE REVISED |
| | PLAN SETS- PLEASE ADD THE REQUIRED SHEETS. |
| | 1) THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS CLASSIFIED AS A RENOVATED |
| | BUILDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION C202 FBC-14 ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION, AND THEREFORE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE CURRENT CODE PER SECTION C101.4.3. PLEASE SUBMIT |
| | TWO COPIES OF COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION USING EITHER THE |
| | PRESCRIPTIVE OR PERFORMANCE BASED COMPLIANCE PATH AS |
| | OUTLINED IN SECTION C101.5.1. |
| | (PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NARRATIVE RESPONSE IS INDICATING |
| | A PREVIOUSLY CONDITIONED BUILDING, HOWEVER THIS IS NOT |
| | THE ISSUE). |
| | 2) REFER TO SECTION C403.2.1 AND SUBMIT COOLING AND |
| | HEATING CALCULATIONS FOR THE NEW 3-TON AC SYSTEM IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES DESRIBED IN THE |
| | ASHRAE/ACCA STANDARD 183 OR ACCA MANUAL N. |
| | ( PLEASE NOTE THE NARRATIVE RESPONSE INDICATES THE |
| | CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BUT THEY WERE NOT |
| | SUBMITTED). |
| | 4) SITE SPECIFIC WINDLOAD ENGINEERING IS REQUIRED FOR |
| | ROOFTOP AC UNITS IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 301.15. THE |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD MUST PROVIDE THE WIND LOAD DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA AND DESIGN PRESSURES ON THE PLAN, AND SUBMIT |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED NOA'S OR PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| | THE ROOF STAND AND CLIPS. |
| | (PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NOA WAS SUBMITTED HOWEVER THE |
| | REQUESTED WIND DESIGN CRITERIA WAS NOT INDICATED ON THE |
| | PLANS AS REQUESTED). |
| | |
| | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6719 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
