| Date |
Text |
| 2016-01-14 09:02:54 | YOUR RESUBMITTAL ADDRESSING THE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED |
| | DEFICIENCIES HAS ONCE AGAIN FAILED THE ELECTRICAL |
| | REVIEW AS INDICATED BELOW. NEW COMMENTS IF ANY PROMPTED |
| | BY ANOTHER REVIEW, MOST LIKELY DUE TO YOUR FAILURE TO |
| | SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING THE |
| | REQUIRED CORRECTIONS WILL BE NUMBERED IN CONTINUATION |
| | OF ANY PREVIOUS COMMENTS. |
| | ALL OF THE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED DEFICIENCIES HAVE BEEN |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED EXCEPT THE ONE MENTIONED |
| | BELOW. |
| | COMMENT #2: NEC 215.5 REQUIRES A FEEDER DIAGRAM WITH |
| | LOAD CALCS AND CONDUCTOR SIZING. THE FEEDER DIAGRAM |
| | PROVIDED FAILS TO INCLUDE ALL THE PANELS INCLUDED |
| | WITHIN THE AREA OF THE SCOPE OF WORK. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVISE YOUR DRAWINGS TO REFLECT THE ABOVE |
| | MENTIONED DEFICIENCIES. |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE |
| | STANDARD CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. THE NARRATIVE SHOULD |
| | INCLUDE THE PLAN REVIEWER?S COMMENTS AND YOUR RESPONSE |
| | OR ACTION TO SAME. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR COMPARISON. |
| | CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON'T HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. |
| | THANK YOU, |
| | MIKE ALBARRAN |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | PH: 561-805-6746 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
