| Date |
Text |
| 2015-11-03 09:50:16 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | W. P. B. PERMIT: 15100678 |
| | ADD: 5817 CORPORATE WAY |
| | CONT: ALL AMERICAN WINDOWS |
| | TEL: (954)786-8625 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2014 WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| | ADMINISTRATION |
| | |
| | 2014 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 COMPLIANCE. |
| | ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND |
| | SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW |
| | DATE: TUES. NOV. 03/2014 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) ENGINEERING WIND LOADS FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING |
| | SHEET SIGNED AND SEALED BY JAVAD AHMAD P. E. |
| | IS FOR A EXPOSURE ?D? AND A ROOF SLOPE> 10 DEGREES. |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE CORRECT WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THIS |
| | JOB. THE JOB IS A EXPOSURE ?C? WIND ZONE 170 VULT, 3 |
| | SECOND GUST AND A FLAT ROOF. PRESSURES WILL GO UP ON |
| | THE FLAT ROOF COMPARED TO A ROOF WITH A ROOF SLOPE OF > |
| | THAN 10 DEGREES. 2014 FBC-B 1603.1.4 WIND DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET A-2.4 & A-2.5 ARE CONTRACTOR PREPARED |
| | DRAWINGS. F. S. 471.003?QUALIFICATIONS FOR PRACTICE; |
| | EXEMPTIONS.? (1)?NO PERSON OTHER THAN A DULY LICENSED |
| | ENGINEER SHALL PRACTICE ENGINEERING OR USE THE NAME OR |
| | TITLE OF ?LICENSED ENGINEER,? ?PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,? |
| | OR ANY OTHER TITLE, DESIGNATION, WORDS, LETTERS, |
| | ABBREVIATIONS, OR DEVICE TENDING TO INDICATE THAT SUCH |
| | PERSON HOLDS AN ACTIVE LICENSE AS AN ENGINEER IN THIS |
| | STATE. |
| | |
| | 3) PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEW FORM DOES SUBMITTED BY ALL |
| | AMERICAN WINDOWS AND DOORS DOES NOT LIST THE WIND |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA AS TO HOW THE PRESSURES WERE DERIVED. |
| | THE PRESSURES BY JAVAD AHMAD P.E. WILL VARY SINCE THE |
| | WRONG DESIGN CRITERIA WAS USED. |
| | |
| | 4) PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEW FORM DOES SUBMITTED BY ALL |
| | AMERICAN WINDOWS AND DOORS DOES NOT FOLLOW THE SAME |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA. ALL AMERICAN IS USING THE OVERALL |
| | OPENING SIZE WHERE AS THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED |
| | 15-0826.31 PAGE 3 OF 12 SIZES THE OPENINGS WITH THE |
| | MULLION TRIBUTARY AREA W1+W2/2= TRIBUTARY AREA. |
| | |
| | 5) NOA 13-0820.12 MR. GLASS DOORS & WINDOW NOA SERIES |
| | MG-500 ALUMINUM OUTSWING FRENCH DOORS, THERE ARE NO |
| | SWING DOORS SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN NOR ANY FOUND IN |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEW SHEET. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL |
| | INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6) THE 1ST FLOOR, FLOOR PLAN DOES HAVE A DOOR |
| | IDENTIFIED AS 1W. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEW SHEET |
| | ALSO HAS A 1W LISTED IN THE REVIEW FORM AND A NOA |
| | 13-0820.12 MR. GLASS DOORS & WINDOW NOA SERIES MG-500 |
| | ALUMINUM OUTSWING FRENCH DOORS. EITHER THE FRONT ENTRY |
| | DOORS SHOULD BE DRAWN AS SWING DOORS OR THE WRONG |
| | APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED AND IS EITHER HORIZONTAL SLIDING |
| | DOORS OR POWER-OPERATED DOORS. 107.1.2 ADDITIONAL |
| | INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| | 1008.1.4.2 POWER-OPERATED DOORS, OR 1008.1.4.3 |
| | HORIZONTAL SLIDING DOORS. PLEASE SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION |
| | FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 7) THE TOTAL PROJECT THE INTERIOR RENOVATION AND |
| | EXTERIOR GLAZING WILL BE CONSIDERED UNDER THE 2014 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CODE BY DEFINITION A RENOVATION. PLEASE |
| | REVIEW UNDER THE DEFINITION OF ALTERATION UNDER THE |
| | 2014 FBC-ENERGY CODE. CHAPTER 2 (CE) DEFINITIONS: A |
| | RESIDENTIAL OR NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING UNDERGOING |
| | ALTERATION THAT VARIES OR CHANGES INSULATION, HVAC |
| | SYSTEMS, WATER HEATING SYSTEMS, OR EXTERIOR ENVELOPE |
| | CONDITIONS, PROVIDED THE ESTIMATED COST OF RENOVATION |
| | EXCEEDS 30 PERCENT OF THE ASSESSED VALUE OF THE |
| | STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2014 FBC-ENERGY CODE |
| | C401.2.1 APPLICATION TO EXISTING BUILDINGS. |
| | ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS AND REPAIRS TO EXISTING |
| | BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | 1. SECTIONS C402, C403, C404 AND C405; OR |
| | 2. ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1. |
| | |
| | 8) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION |
| | & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
