| Date |
Text |
| 2015-11-24 17:03:23 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | ART LANGE - BUILDING INSPECTOR |
| | 561-805-6667 [email protected] |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION/ FRC FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE 2015 5TH EDITION |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW: |
| | |
| | OUTSTANDING FROM FIRST REVIEW: |
| | |
| | 2. PROVIDE WIND DESIGN LOADS/DESIGN PRESSURES PURSUANT |
| | TO FBC-R301.2. FOR EACH WINDOW OPENING. |
| | |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW COMMENTS OUTSTANDING: |
| | |
| | 1. PERMIT APPLICATION DESCRIPTION OF WORK SHOWS REPLACE |
| | WINDOW. THE FLOOR PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS 13 WINDOWS. WILL |
| | THE DOORS BE REPLACE TOO. IF SO PROVIDE TWO SETS OF |
| | NOA'S FOR DOORS. |
| | |
| | 2. INCLUDE A WINDOW SCHEDULE FOR ALL OF THE WINDOWS AND |
| | DOORS INSTALLED. ONE CAN BE FOUND ON OUR WEBSITE OR AT |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT. |
| | |
| | 3. PERMIT VALUATION IS LOW. INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS, |
| | LABOR AND OVERHEAD. FBC 109.3 BUILDING PERMIT |
| | VALUATION. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF |
| | BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE |
| | TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, |
| | INTERIOR FINISH, RELATIVE SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND |
| | DESIGN FEES, MARKETING COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; |
| | EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY |
| | INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL |
| | CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES (MARSHALL-SWIFT, |
| | MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY INTERNATIONAL CODE |
| | CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION SHALL BE SET |
| | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | THIRD REVIEW: |
| | |
| | ALL OF THE ABOVE COMMENTS ARE STILL OUTSTANDING. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. I RECEIVED ONE SET OF A LAWSON LA PORTE NOA. PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT A SECOND SET. |
| | |
| | 2. LAWSON HS08700 WINDOW NOA IS MISSING PAGES 5, 9 AND |
| | 10. |
| | |
| | 3. IF MULLIONS ARE USED PROVIDE TWO SETS OF NOA'S FOR |
| | MULLIONS. |
| | |
| | FOURTH REVIEW: |
| | |
| | ALL OF THE ABOVE COMMENTS ARE STILL OUTSTANDING. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | |
| | 1. A SCHEDULE FOR SHUTTERS WAS SUBMITTED INSTEAD OF A |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE. |
