| Date |
Text |
| 2015-11-30 17:32:01 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | 1. PLAN STATES THAT NON IMPACT WINDOWS WERE INSTALLED |
| | (AND OUR RECORDS INDICATE THAT THE WINDOWS ARE NON |
| | IMPACT), AND PLAN ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IMPACT PROTECTION |
| | IS REQUIRED. HOWEVER, IMPACT WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | WERE SUBMITTED. THIS DOES NOT APPEAR CONSISTENT WITH |
| | THE WORK DONE. DO YOU PROPOSE TO REMOVE THE NON IMPACT |
| | WINDOWS AND INSTALL IMPACT? |
| | |
| | IF WINDOWS ARE NON IMPACT AND ARE TO REMAIN, PROVIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS, FAC9N-3. ALSO PROVIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS FOR THE SHUTTERS REFERRED TO ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2. FOR THE SHUTTERS, COMPLETE THE SAMPLE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE OR PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION TO SHOW CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE IN ANOTHER FORMAT, FBC*106, FBC R301, |
| | FBC1609. TWO SETS REQUIRED. THIS FORM IS AVAILABLE IN |
| | THE LOBBY OR ON THE INTERNET AT |
| | |
| | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/ |
| | 2013/09/SCHEDULE_FOR_INSTALLATION.PDF |
| | |
| | 3. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT AFFECT, IF ANY, ENCLOSING THE |
| | PORCH HAS ON EMERGENCY EGRESS FOR SLEEPING ROOMS. |
| | REVISE THE PLAN TO SHOW ROOM DESIGNATION(S) FOR THE |
| | ROOM(S) ADJACENT TO THE FRONT PORCH, FBC R310. |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4. PLAN SHOWS TWO COLUMNS AN NO WALL WHERE THE FORMER |
| | EXTERIOR WALL WAS LOCATED. REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY; IS |
| | THE WALL IN PLACE OR HAS IT BEEN REMOVED? FBC 107 |
| | |
| | 5. PLAN IS NOT CLEAR. A NOTE STATES THAT STRAPS ARE NOT |
| | REQUIRED AS THE WALL IS INFILL ONLY, BUT THE DETAIL |
| | SHOWS STRAPS. CORRELATE AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO |
| | SHOW THAT THE INFILL WALL WILL RESIST WIND LOADS, FBC |
| | 5TH ED. 301. IF STRAPS ARE NOT UTILIZED, DETAIL SHOULD |
| | SHOW WHAT IS TO HOLD THE WALL IN PLACE TO RESIST |
| | POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE WIND PRESSURES. DETAIL SHOWS |
| | STRAPS, LANGUAGE STATES THEY ARE NOT TO BE INSTALLED, |
| | PROPOSED DESIGN NOT CLEAR. |
| | |
| | 6. PLAN IS NOT CLEAR; GROUND FLOOR PLAN GRAPHICALLY |
| | SHOWS SUPPORTS LARGER THAN THE WALL, AND IT APPEARS |
| | THAT THE SUPPORTS MAY BE NEW, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY, |
| | FBC 107. |
| | |
| | 7. A NEW DOOR WAS INSTALLED WITHOUT PERMIT, SEE |
| | PREVIOUS LIST, REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE ALL WORK DONE AS |
| | WELL AS ALL WORK REQUIRED TO BRING INTO COMPLIANCE. |
| | PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE DOOR, |
| | FAC9N-3, FBC 107, FBC 5TH. ED RESIDENTIAL 301. |
| | |
| | 8. PLAN STATES THAT SCOPE IS REMOVAL OF PLEXIGLASS |
| | WINDOWS, INSTALLATION OF NEW WINDOWS. THE PORCH WAS |
| | REBUILT, ELECTRICAL ADDED. REVISE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT |
| | WITH WORK DONE WITHOUT PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 9. VALUE IS TO INCLUDE ALL WORK DONE WITHOUT PERMIT, |
| | FBC 109. PROVIDE A COST BREAKDOWN OF WORK TO BE |
| | INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
