| Plan Review Notes For Permit 15090341 |
| Permit Number |
15090341 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
3 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2015-12-28 15:18:22 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. FBC 107, TWO COMPLETE COLLATED SETS OF PERMIT | | | DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | | | | THE TWO SETS ARE TO BE IDENTICAL. SIX PRODUCT APPROVALS | | | WERE SUBMITTED: | | | | | | TWO DIFFERENT HORIZONTAL ROLLER WINDOW PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED. | | | TWO DIFFERENT SINGLE HUNG WINDOW | | | ONE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | ONE MULLION PRODUCT APPROVAL | | | | | | SCOPE NOT CLEAR, FBC 107. IF TWO DIFFERENT SINGLE HUNG | | | BRANDS AND TWO DIFFERENT HR BRANDS ARE PROPOSED, REVISE | | | FLOOR PLAN TO CLARIFY. | | | | | | THIRD REVIEW, COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED. THE TWO SETS OF | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE NOT IDENTICAL. WINDOWS PROPOSED | | | IS NOT CLEAR. THREE WINDOWS ARE MARKED "PGT NOA | | | ATTACHED". BOTH HR AND SH PGT PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE | | | SUBMITTED. | | | | | | PROVIDE A NEW FLOOR PLAN WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS THE WINDOW | | | TYPE AND BRAND IN EACH OPENING. THE FLOOR PLAN | | | SUBMITTED DOES NOT SHOW SCOPE, FBC 107. | | | | | | A FEE WILL BE CHARGED FOR EACH RESUBMITTAL AS A REVIEW | | | IS DONE EACH TIME. | | | | | | 2. THE NOC FILED IS FOR A DIFFERENT CONTRACTOR. PROVIDE | | | A COPY OF A CORRECTLY COMPLETED AND FILED NOC. | | | | | | |
|
