| Date |
Text |
| 2016-04-20 18:13:14 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) (REPEAT COMMENT) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. PROVIDE |
| | TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA NUMBERS |
| | INCLUDING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR EACH OF THE DIFFERENT ROOFING MATERIALS, |
| | RIDGE VENT, WINDOW/GLASS TYPES, STRUCTURAL MULLIONS AND |
| | EXTERIOR DOOR TYPES. THE PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD. |
| | |
| | 2) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE RIDGE SHINGLE EXPIRED |
| | IN 2006. SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A CURRENT ONE. FBC |
| | 107.3.4 |
| | |
| | 3) THE PLANS SPECIFY DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS AND THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE FOR SINGLE HUNG. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) THE DRAWINGS FOR THE FIXED WINDOWS ARE MISSING |
| | INFORMATION. THEY WERE NOT SHRUNK DOWN TO FIT ON THE |
| | SMALLER SIZE COPY PAPER. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE ROOF TILE ADHESIVE |
| | THAT WILL USED TO INSTALL THE MISSION CLAY TILE. FBC |
| | 107.3.4 |
| | |
| | 6) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR ENHANCED FASTENING OF THE INSULATION |
| | BOARDS AND BASE/ANCHOR SHEET AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #7 OF THE JOHNS MANVILLE MODIFIED BITUMEN |
| | ROOFING SYSTEM (NOA NO. 13-0529.14). |
| | |
| | 7) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE GLAZED FRENCH DOORS |
| | THAT WERE SUBMITTED DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE DOOR |
| | TYPES SHOWN ON SHEET A7.1 OF THE PLANS. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 8) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE SIDE HINGED OUT |
| | SWING GARAGE DOORS. FBC 107.3.4 |
| | |
| | 9) THE STRUCTURAL REPORT FROM THE ENGINEER IS REQUIRED |
| | TO HAVE HIS ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE ON IT. |
| | DIGITALLY SIGNED PLANS ARE ONLY FOR ELECTRONICALLY |
| | SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS. FAC 61G15-23.002 & 61G15-23.003 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
