| Date |
Text |
| 2015-11-03 15:10:55 | THOUGH THESE DRAWINGS WERE ONCE BEFORE REVIEWED. THE |
| | FAILURE TO PROVIDE A NARRATIVE PROMPTED ME TO CONDUCT A |
| | COMPLETE REVIEW OF THE PLANS FOR A SECOND TIME. |
| | THE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | 2011 EDITION OF THE NEC, (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE); |
| | THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FBC, (FLORIDA BUILDING CODE) AS |
| | APPLICABLE AND BELOW ARE THE DEFICIENCIES NOTED. |
| | |
| | 1. THE CODE ANALYSIS BOX IS REFERENCING STANDARDS FROM |
| | THE 2010 FBC, NO LONGER IN EFFECT. THE APPLICABLE CODE |
| | TO WHICH YOU SHALL CONFORM IS AS MENTIONED ABOVE. |
| | 2. I NOTICE THAT THE FIXTURE SCHEDULE INDICATES THE USE |
| | OF RECESSED LUMINARIES WITHOUT MENTIONING THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION SECTION |
| | 402.4.8, WHICH REQUIRES THAT ALL RECESSED LIGHTING BE |
| | IC RATED AND SEALED TO PREVENT AIR LEAKAGE FROM THE |
| | CONDITIONED AIR SPACE INTO THE NON-CONDITIONED AIR |
| | SPACE. |
| | 3. YOU SHALL SUBMIT LIGHT DENSITY ALLOWANCE |
| | CALCULATIONS AS INDICATED IN FBC-E SECTIONS 405.5. |
| | 4. NEC 600.5 REQUIRES THAT THERE BE A DEDICATED SIGN |
| | OUTLET AT EVERY PEDESTRIAN ENTRY, FOR EVERY COMMERCIAL |
| | OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE |
| | STANDARD CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE |
| | INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR COMPARISON. |
| | CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. |
| | |
| | THANK YOU, |
| | MIKE ALBARRAN |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | |
