| Date |
Text |
| 2015-10-07 17:50:44 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE NOTES ON SHEET A1 INDICATE THAT THIS IS A LEVEL |
| | 2 ALTERATION. BECAUSE THE WORK AREA CONSISTS OF MORE |
| | THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE AGGREGATE AREA OF THE BUILDING |
| | IT IS A LEVEL 3 ALTERATION. FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | SECTION 505.1 |
| | |
| | 2) SPECIFY THE WIND DATA ON THE PLANS. THE WIND SPEED |
| | IS 170MPH VULT / 132MPH VASD AND THE EXPOSURE CATEGORY |
| | IS C. FBC-R301.2.1 WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE 2 ON SHEET A1 REFERENCES ASCE 7 - 02. UP DATE |
| | THE EDITION TO THE ONE REFERENCED IN THE 2014 FBC, |
| | WHICH IS ASCE 7 - 10. |
| | |
| | 4) THE WINDLOAD PRESSURES FOR THE WINDOWS ON A1 APPEAR |
| | TO BE HIGHER THAN REQUIRED. PLEASE REVIEW. FBC-R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) THERE IS A CONFLICT ON SHEET A2 BETWEEN THE WALL |
| | SECTIONS AND THE FOUNDATION PLAN. THE WALL SECTIONS |
| | SHOW A WOOD FRAMED FLOOR SYSTEM AT THE FIRST FLOOR AND |
| | THE FOUNDATION SHOWS A CONCRETE SLAB FLOOR SYSTEM. |
| | PLEASE CORRECT. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 6) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC - R703.6.3 WATER-RESISTIVE |
| | BARRIERS. |
| | WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED |
| | IN SECTION R703.2 AND, WHERE APPLIED OVER WOOD-BASED |
| | SHEATHING, SHALL INCLUDE A WATER-RESISTIVE |
| | VAPOR-PERMEABLE BARRIER WITH A PERFORMANCE AT LEAST |
| | EQUIVALENT TO TWO LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER. THE |
| | INDIVIDUAL LAYERS SHALL BE INSTALLED INDEPENDENTLY SUCH |
| | THAT EACH LAYER PROVIDES A SEPARATE CONTINUOUS PLANE |
| | AND ANY FLASHING (INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION |
| | R703.8) INTENDED TO DRAIN TO THE WATER-RESISTIVE |
| | BARRIER IS DIRECTED BETWEEN THE LAYERS. |
| | |
| | EXCEPTION: WHERE THE WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER THAT IS |
| | APPLIED OVER WOOD-BASED SHEATHING HAS A WATER |
| | RESISTANCE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THAT OF 60-MINUTE |
| | GRADE D PAPER AND IS SEPARATED FROM THE STUCCO BY AN |
| | INTERVENING, SUBSTANTIALLY NONWATER-ABSORBING LAYER OR |
| | DESIGNED DRAINAGE SPACE. |
| | |
| | 7) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R807.1 ATTIC ACCESS. |
| | BUILDINGS WITH COMBUSTIBLE CEILING OR ROOF CONSTRUCTION |
| | SHALL HAVE AN ATTIC ACCESS OPENING TO ATTIC AREAS THAT |
| | EXCEED 30 SQUARE FEET (2.8 M2) AND HAVE A VERTICAL |
| | HEIGHT OF 30 INCHES (762 MM) OR GREATER. THE VERTICAL |
| | HEIGHT SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE CEILING |
| | FRAMING MEMBERS TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF FRAMING |
| | MEMBERS. |
| | THE ROUGH-FRAMED OPENING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 22 |
| | INCHES BY 30 INCHES (559 MM BY 762 MM) AND SHALL BE |
| | LOCATED IN A HALLWAY OR OTHER READILY ACCESSIBLE |
| | LOCATION. WHEN LOCATED IN A WALL, THE OPENING SHALL BE |
| | A MINIMUM OF 22 INCHES WIDE BY 30 INCHES HIGH (559 MM |
| | WIDE BY 762 MM HIGH). WHEN THE ACCESS IS LOCATED IN A |
| | CEILING, MINIMUM UNOBSTRUCTED HEADROOM IN THE ATTIC |
| | SPACE SHALL BE 30 INCHES (762 MM) AT SOME POINT ABOVE |
| | THE ACCESS MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE BOTTOM OF |
| | CEILING FRAMING MEMBERS. |
| | |
| | 8) REVISE THE UPLIFT VALUE FOR THE SIMPSON MTS20 |
| | CONNECTORS. THE UPLIFT IN THE 2015 SIMPSON CATALOG FOR |
| | THESE STRAPS ARE 1000 LBS AND THE PLANS SPECIFY 1450 |
| | LBS, WHICH IS THE UPLIFT VALUE FOR THE HTS20 WITH 20 - |
| | 10D NAILS. FBC- R801.2 |
| | |
| | 9) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THE FLAT ROOF COVERING MATERIALS THAT HAVE BEEN |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD. DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | |
| | 10) IN ORDER TO VERIFY THE VALUE FOR THE PROPOSED WORK, |
| | SUBMIT A COPY OF THE SIGNED CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. FBC FBC |
| | 109.3 |
| | |
| | 11) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIMES AND PROVIDE |
| | CLARIFICATION, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
