| Date |
Text |
| 2015-11-05 19:33:36 | THE PLANS FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2008 EDITION |
| | OF THE NEC, (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE); THE 2010 FBC, |
| | (FLORIDA BUILDING CODE) AS APPLICABLE AND BELOW ARE THE |
| | DEFICIENCIES NOTED. |
| | |
| | THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFULLY REVIEWED FOR |
| | COMPLIANCE A SECOND TIME. BE ADVISED THAT: |
| | PURSUANT TO FL ?553.80, THE 4TH SUBMITTAL FOR A PERMIT |
| | WHICH REFLECTS FAILURE TO CORRECT A DEFICIENCY |
| | PREVIOUSLY SPECIFICALLY AND CONSISTENTLY IDENTIFIED ON |
| | ALL PRIOR SUBMITTALS MUST RESULT IN THE ASSESSMENT OF A |
| | PENALTY OF 3 TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW FEE IN ADDITION TO |
| | THE NORMAL FEE |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE NUMBER YOUR PAGES IN A USUAL AND CUSTOMARY |
| | MANNER WHERE THERE ARE SPECIFIC SECTIONS FOR THE |
| | VARIOUS TRADES; EACH OF WHICH COMMENCES WITH A SHEET 1 |
| | SO AS NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH WHAT APPEARS TO BE AN |
| | INCOMPLETE SET OF PLANS. AS IT IS, YOU ARE MISSING PAGE |
| | 2.2E SUPPOSEDLY THE ROOF LAY OUT OF THE ELECTRICAL AND |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. |
| | 2. YOU SHALL PROVIDE BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR BOTH THE |
| | FRONT AND BREEZEWAY FACADES TO ASCERTAIN WHAT IS |
| | SUPPOSEDLY A DOOR OR A WINDOW. |
| | 3. PROVIDE WALL SECTIONS TO INDICATE WHICH ARE GLASS |
| | CURTAIN WALLS IF ANY. |
| | 4. CONTRARY TO THE SUBMITTED RESPONSE, GENERAL NOTES 1, |
| | CONTINUE TO MAKE REFERENCE TO A NON-EXISTENT CODE. |
| | CORRECT THE NOTE ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 5. NEC 300.5: AMBIENT CONDITIONS DICTATE CONDUCTOR |
| | INSULATION, NOT THE AWG GAUGE. PER CODE THWN INSULATION |
| | IS REQUIRED IN WET LOCATIONS. CORRECT YOUR ELECTRICAL |
| | NOTE 12 ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 6. NEC 406.9(B): ALL OUTLETS IN WET LOCATIONS IN |
| | ADDITION TO HAVE WEATHER-PROOF COVERS SHALL BE LISTED |
| | ?WR? WEATHER-RESISTANT. CORRECT YOU ELECTRICAL NOTE 20 |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 7. NEC 600.5 REQUIRES A DEDICATED SIGN OUTLET AT EVERY |
| | PEDESTRIAN ENTRY. THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS NEVER ASKED IF |
| | THE EXISTING SIGNS WERE LIT OR NOT, THEY ADDRESSED THE |
| | CODE REQUIREMENTS WHICH YOU FAILED TO ADHERE TO. |
| | 8. NEC 210.62: CONTRARY TO YOUR RESPONSE TO MY |
| | COMMENTS, YOU FAIL TO SHOW THE ?SHOW WINDOW? OUTLETS |
| | YOU INDICATED ON THE NORTH ELEVATION. |
| | 9. ALL CORRECTIONS SHALL BE CLOUDED FOR IDENTIFICATION |
| | AND AS INSTRUCTED BELOW THE NEW PAGES INSERTED INTO THE |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE |
| | STANDARD CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE |
| | INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR COMPARISON. |
| | CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. |
| | |
| | THANK YOU, |
| | MIKE ALBARRAN |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | |
