| Date |
Text |
| 2015-09-10 11:57:36 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | W. P. B. PERMIT: 15080784 |
| | ADD: 330 CLEMATIS STREET # 110 |
| | CONT: TBD |
| | TEL: (561)686-5853 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2014 WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| | ADMINISTRATION, |
| | |
| | 2014 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 COMPLIANCE. |
| | ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND |
| | SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW |
| | DATE: THURS. SEPT. 10/2014 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) MISSING CODE DESIGN, THE COVERSHEET INDICATES A |
| | BUILDING TYPE 3B. SPRINKLERED OR NOT. TABLE 503 & TABLE |
| | 508.4. THE CONCERN IS NOT THE VERTICAL OCCUPANCY BUT |
| | THE HORIZONTAL OCCUPANCY SEPARATION, SEE 2014 FBC-B |
| | TABLE 707.3.10. |
| | |
| | 2) THERE IS A DESCREPANCY IN PLANS BETWEEN SHEET C1 THE |
| | COVERSHEET AND SHEET 1.4 FOR THE WAY THE OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | IS COMPUTED, THERE IS A DISCREPANCY IN THE OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD. NOTE THE EXTERIOR SEASONAL SEATING WILL STILL |
| | NEED TO EXIT THROUGH A DOORWAY. |
| | |
| | 3)THE COVERSHEET UNDER THE HEADING OF NUMBER OF SEATS |
| | LIST 52 PEOPLE UNDER THE EXTERIOR PATIO. PLEASE THE |
| | LIFE SAFETY PLAN DOES NOT SHOW 2 EXITS FROM THIS SPACE. |
| | PLEAASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH 2014 FBC-B 1015.2.1. |
| | TABLE 1015.1 MAX 1 EXIT 49 FOR ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | 4) THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN 1.4 DOES NOT IDENTIFY THE |
| | DOORS, SHEET 1.0A INDICATES THE DOOR IDENTIFICATION |
| | TAGS BUT NOT THE EXIT SIGNS. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE DOORS |
| | ON SHEET 1.4 THE LIFE SAFETY TO VERIFY THE EXITING. THE |
| | LIFE SAFETY PLANS DO NOT INDICATE THE EXITING PATERNS |
| | FOR THE OCCUPANTS. |
| | 107.3.5.1.1 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL |
| | BUILDINGS |
| | OCCUPANCY LOAD/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS SHALL INCLUDE: |
| | OCCUPANCY LOAD |
| | GROSS |
| | NET |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | EXIT ACCESS |
| | EXIT |
| | EXIT DISCHARGE |
| | DOORS |
| | EMERGENCY LIGHTING AND EXIT SIGNS |
| | |
| | 5) THE SHEET 1.4 LIFE SAFETY SHEET VERSES 2.0E DOES NOT |
| | MATCH UP WITH BATTERY EXIT SIGNS W/ FLOODS. DISCREPANCY |
| | IN PLANS. ADDITIONAL INFORMAION IS REQUIRED. DEPENDING |
| | ON THE FINAL VERSION OF PLANS ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY |
| | OCCUR. |
| | |
| | 6) THE SHEET 1.4 THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN SHOWS A EXIT FROM |
| | THE KITCHEN, WITH THE EXIT DOOR OF THE KITCHEN YOU |
| | ENTER THE EXIT DISCHARGE. THE PLANS MUST MEET ALL OF |
| | THE REQUIREMENTS OF 2014 FBC-B 1027.1 NOTE THE WALLS DO |
| | NOT INDICATE AN Y RATING. ALSO NOTE THE EAST WALL OF |
| | THE EXTERIOR DINING ROOM APPEARS TO HAVE A DOOR OPENING |
| | WITHOUT A DOOR WAY. THE EXISTING SITE HAS A GATE AT THE |
| | END OF THE EXIT DISCHARGE NOT SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED |
| | PLANS, WILL THIS BE REMOVED, IF NOT IS IT LOCKABLE? |
| | |
| | 7) THERE ARE NEW EXTERIOR ELEMENTS FOR COMPONENTS AND |
| | CLADDING PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH: 2014 FBC-B |
| | 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.4.1 |
| | COMPONENTS & CLADDING. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY |
| | AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF |
| | PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| | (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS. |
| | (B) WINDOWS |
| | (C) WALL LOUVERS, |
| | (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES/ ROOF TOP CURBS/ |
| | EXHAUST FANS |
| | (G) PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS |
| | |
| | 8) 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS |
| | WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| | |
| | 9) THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA OR |
| | PRESSURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE NEW OPENINGS: |
| | 2014 FBC-B 1603.1.4 WIND DESIGN DATA. |
| | THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND LOADS SHALL |
| | BE SHOWN, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER WIND LOADS GOVERN THE |
| | DESIGN OF THE LATERAL FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM OF THE |
| | STRUCTURE: |
| | |
| | 9.1. ULTIMATE DESIGN WIND SPEED, VULT, (3-SECOND GUST), |
| | MILES PER HOUR (KM/HR) AND NOMINAL DESIGN WIND SPEED, |
| | VASD, AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION |
| | 1609.3.1. |
| | |
| | 9.2. RISK CATEGORY. |
| | |
| | 9.3. WIND EXPOSURE. APPLICABLE WIND DIRECTION IF MORE |
| | THAN ONE WIND EXPOSURE IS UTILIZED. |
| | |
| | 9.4APPLICABLE INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT. |
| | |
| | 9.DESIGN WIND PRESSURES TO BE USED FOR EXTERIOR |
| | COMPONENT AND CLADDING MATERIALS NOT SPECIFICALLY |
| | DESIGNED BY THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE, PSF (KN/ |
| | M2). |
| | |
| | 10) SHEET 1.6 HAS A NOTE THAT IN THE NEW EXTERIOR |
| | DINING ROOM THE THERE IS AN ORIGINAL DROP CEILING, |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE WILL TYPE OF CEILING IS IT. WILL THE |
| | CEILING TAKE POSITIVE PRESSURES FROM A HIGH WIND EVENT. |
| | 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 11) NEITHER DOES M2.2 OR M3.2 INDICATE IF THE EXISITNG |
| | EXHAUST DUCT AND ROOF TOP FAN ARE TO BE REUSED FOR THE |
| | HOOD EXHAUST, NOR IS THERE ANY INFORMATION HOW THE DUCT |
| | IS CHASED THROUGH THE 2ND FLOOR ASSEMBLY AND TO THE |
| | ROOF TOP? 107.2.1.3. |
| | |
| | 12) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| | REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES |
| | AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
