| Date |
Text |
| 2015-10-14 11:02:19 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | W. P. B. PERMIT: 15080653 |
| | ADD: 1819 OKEECHOBEE RD. |
| | CONT: GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES |
| | TEL: (954)971-1810 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W * 2014 WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| | ADMINISTRATION |
| | |
| | 2014 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 COMPLIANCE. |
| | ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND |
| | SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | DATE: WED. OCT. 14/2015 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) COVERSHEET ?T: |
| | |
| | 1) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET A1.1: |
| | |
| | 2A) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 2B) 2ND REQUEST. PLEASE PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR |
| | THIS TENANT, IN THE TRAINING ROOM WITH A OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | OF 72 REQUIRES (2) MEANS OF EGRESS.2014 FBC-B TABLE |
| | 1015.1 BUSINESS OCCUPANCY MAXIMUM OCCUPANTS WITH ONE |
| | EXIT IS 49. THE RESPONSE THE 2ND MEANS OF EGRESS IS |
| | THROUGH THE SMALL PARTS ROOM 100, THROUGH A RATED WALL. |
| | THE SMALL PARTS ROOM # 100 IS A S2 OCCUPANCY, THIS IS |
| | THE REASON FOR THE FIRE RATING OF THE WALL PER TABLE |
| | 508.4. 2014 FBC-B 1014.2 1014.2.1 EGRESS THROUGH |
| | INTERVENING SPACES. EXCEPTIION: MEANS OF EGRESS ARE NOT |
| | PROHIBITED THROUGH ADJOINING OR INTERVENING ROOMS OR |
| | SPACES IN A GROUP H, S OR F OCCUPANCY WHEN THE |
| | ADJOINING OR INTERVENING ROOMS OR SPACES ARE THE SAME |
| | OR A LESSER HAZARD OCCUPANCY GROUP. TABLE 508.4 DOES |
| | NOT REQUIRE OCCUPANCY SEPARATION BETWEEN B, F-1, M & S1 |
| | OCCUPANCIES. THE PARTS ROOM IT APPEARS WOULD FALL INTO |
| | THE S-2 CATEGORY REQUIRING THE 1 HOUR SEPARATION WHEN |
| | FIRE SPRINKLERED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2C) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 2D) SEMI-COMPLIED. DISCREPANCY IN PLANS SHEET A1.1 |
| | VERSES A2.1. THE LIFE SAFETY PLANS SHOWS THERE IS NO |
| | LONGER A RATING BETWEEN ROOMS 103 & 104, WHERE AS A1.1 |
| | STILL SHOWS A RATED WALL. THE MATERIAL LEGEND FOUND ON |
| | A1.1 UNDER THE HEAING EXISTING FIRE RATED WALLS : |
| | EXISTING FIRE RATED WALLS & REPAIR AS REQUIREDTO |
| | MAINTAIN FIRE RATING. 107.2.1.3. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | COMMENT FROM 1ST REVIEW. THE EXISTING (1) HOUR FIRE |
| | RATED WALL BETWEEN WARE HOUSE 102 & 104 THE PLANS |
| | INDICATE A NEW 12?-0? WIDE OPENING IN NOTE # 5 FOUND ON |
| | THIS PLAN. THERE IS NO INFORMATION ON THIS OPENING IN |
| | THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET A3.1. NOTE SHEET A1.1 WALL |
| | LEGEND INDICATES THIS WALL TO BE A (1) HOUR FIRE RATED |
| | WALL. |
| | |
| | 3) COMPLIED. WELDING CERTIFICATE FOR DAVID ORTIGOZA. |
| | |
| | 4)SEMI-COMPLIED. NOA 15-0218.11 NOT REVIEWED BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD, BEWARE OF ISSUE. SHEET SHEET 5 OF 5 |
| | INDICATES THE RESTRAINT BRACKET FROM THE ROOF CURB TO |
| | ATTACH TO THE RTU. SHEET 2 OF 5, INDICATES THE USE OF |
| | (7) # 10 TEK SCREWS PER RETRAIN BRAKET. |
| | NOTE: WHERE THE NOA SHOWS THE # 10 TEK SCREWS THE |
| | RESTRAINT BRAKET DOES NOT ATTACH!!! IF THE TEK SCREWS |
| | ARE INSTALLED ON TOP OF THE CURB AS DEPICTED ON SHEET 5 |
| | OF 5 THE VALUE FOR PULL OUT WILL BE LESS BECAUSE THEY |
| | ARE NO LONGER IN SHEER!!!! PLEASE EXAMINE CLOSELY. |
| | |
| | COMMENT FROM 1ST REVIEW. SHEET A3.2 DETAIL # A6 & M6.1 |
| | BOTH SHOW NEW OR REPOSITIONED ROOF TOP CURBS BEING |
| | INSTALLED ON THE ROOF. PLEASE SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THE NEW CURBS. 2014 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF |
| | OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & CLADDING |
| | |
| | FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. |
| | 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION |
| | SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| | (31)(D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES/ ROOF TOP CURBS |
| | |
| | 5) SECOND REQUEST. 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE |
| | DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | 6) COMPLIED. 2014 FBC-B 1603.1.4 WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 7) SEMI -COMPLIED. NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR THE EXHAUST FAN NOR CURB. SHEET M6.1.THE PLANS WILL |
| | NEED TO SUPPLY THE CONNECTION OF THE RTU UNITS AND |
| | EXHAUST FANS TO THE ROOF TOP CURBING, TO RESIST THE |
| | EFFECTS OF UPLIFT, SLIDING AND OR OVERTURNING MOMENT. |
| | 2014 FBC-B 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & CLADDING |
| | |
| | 8) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION |
| | & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
