| Date |
Text |
| 2016-01-13 14:53:47 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | W. P. B. PERMIT: 15080551 |
| | ADD: 600 OKEECHOBEE BLVD. |
| | CONT: COASTAL CONSTRUCTION |
| | TEL: (561)659-5819 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2014 WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| | ADMINISTRATION, |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | DATE: WED. JAN. 13/ 2016 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | NOTICE!!!!!!!!!!!!! CHAPTER 553.80(2)(B) FLORIDA |
| | STATUTES STATES THAT A LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE A |
| | FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE FEE FOR PLAN REVIEW, IF PLANS ARE |
| | REJECTED (3) OR MORE TIMES FOR REPEATED FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION. |
| | |
| | THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FOR THE PROJECT IS TO RESPOND |
| | TO ALL COMMENTS THAT ARE UNDER THEIR DESIGN, NOT THE |
| | CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDED THE RESPONSE SHEET |
| | INDICATING ALL OF THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA (SHEET |
| | S).00) IS ON THE MASTER PERMIT AND SUBMITTED PRINTED |
| | COPIES OF PLANS DIGITAL PLANS THAT WERE STAMPED WITH A |
| | CITY REVISION STAMP. |
| | |
| | THIS IS A STAND ALONE PERMIT AND ALL THE REQUIRED |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA NEEDS TO BE PART OF THIS PERMIT. IT IS |
| | NOT A REVISION THAT WOULD HAVE HAD THE DESIGN CRITERIA |
| | INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL REVIEWED DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS |
| | PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR |
| | PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE DOCUMENT. |
| | FL ADMIN CODE 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS |
| | FL ADMIN CODE 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS |
| | |
| | 1) 2ND REQUEST. DWG N. -16 |
| | 1A) THERE IS NO WIND DESIGN FOR THIS 10 FT. HIGH CMU |
| | SCREEN WALL. |
| | 2014 FBC-B 1603.1.4 WIND DESIGN DATA. |
| | THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND LOADS SHALL |
| | BE SHOWN, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER WIND LOADS GOVERN THE |
| | DESIGN OF THE LATERAL FORCERESISTING SYSTEM OF THE |
| | STRUCTURE: |
| | 1.1. ULTIMATE DESIGN WIND SPEED, VULT, (3-SECOND GUST), |
| | MILES PER HOUR (KM/HR) AND NOMINAL DESIGN WIND SPEED, |
| | VASD, AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION |
| | 1609.3.1. |
| | |
| | 1.2. RISK CATEGORY. |
| | |
| | 1.3. WIND EXPOSURE. APPLICABLE WIND DIRECTION IF MORE |
| | THAN ONE WIND EXPOSURE IS UTILIZED. |
| | |
| | 1.4. APPLICABLE INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT. |
| | |
| | 1.5. DESIGN WIND PRESSURES TO BE USED FOR EXTERIOR |
| | COMPONENT AND CLADDING MATERIALS NOT SPECIFICALLY |
| | DESIGNED BY THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE, PSF |
| | (KN/M2). |
| | |
| | 2) 2ND REQUEST. DWG NO.: SSK -16.RESPONSE INDICATES THE |
| | DESIGN DETAILS ARE PROVIDED. NOT A REVISION BUT A STAND |
| | ALONE PERMIT. THE VERTICAL REBARS IS ASSUMED TO BE #5 , |
| | NOT CLEAR, THERE IS 6 HORIZONTAL BARS RUNNING PARELLEL |
| | IN THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTER WITH VERTICAL UPTURNED LAP |
| | BARS. THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE THE BAR SIZE OF THE LAP |
| | BARS THAT EXTEND FROM THE FOOTER, NOR THE VERTICAL |
| | RE-INFORING BARS, NOR DOES THE PLAN PROVIDE AT WHAT |
| | SPACING THESE BARS ARE CENTER TO CENTER. ONLY MATCH VT |
| | REIN IN SIZE & SPACING? |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING DESIGN CRITERIA, 2014 FBC-B: |
| | 1807.2.3 SAFETY FACTOR. RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE |
| | DESIGNED TO RESIST THE LATERAL ACTION OF SOIL TO |
| | PRODUCE SLIDING AND OVERTURNING WITH A MINIMUM SAFETY |
| | FACTOR OF 1.5 IN EACH CASE. THE LOAD COMBINATIONS OF |
| | SECTION 1605 SHALL NOT APPLY TO THIS REQUIREMENT. |
| | INSTEAD, DESIGN SHALL BE BASED ON 0.7 TIMES NOMINAL |
| | EARTHQUAKE LOADS, 1.0 TIMES OTHER NOMINAL LOADS, AND |
| | INVESTIGATION WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE VARIABLE LOADS |
| | SET TO ZERO. THE SAFETY FACTOR AGAINST LATERAL SLIDING |
| | SHALL BE TAKEN AS THE AVAILABLE SOIL RESISTANCE AT THE |
| | BASE OF THE RETAINING WALL FOUNDATION DIVIDED BY THE |
| | NET LATERAL FORCE APPLIED TO THE RETAINING WALL. |
| | EXCEPTION: WHERE EARTHQUAKE LOADS ARE INCLUDED, THE |
| | MINIMUM SAFETY FACTOR FOR RETAINING WALL SLIDING AND |
| | OVERTURNING SHALL BE 1.1. |
| | |
| | 1807.2.4 REINFORCED MASONRY RETAINING WALLS. VERTICAL |
| | REINFORCEMENT FOR MASONRY RETAINING WALLS SHALL COMPLY |
| | WITH TABLE 1807.2.4 OR SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH TMS 402/ACI 530/ASCE 5. MASONRY SHALL BE FULLY |
| | GROUTED WITH A MINIMUM F"M OF 1,500 PSI (10 343 KPA). |
| | MORTAR FOR MASONRY SHALL BE TYPE M OR S AND LAID IN |
| | RUNNING BOND. THE SPECIFIED LOCATION OF THE |
| | REINFORCEMENT SHALL EQUAL OR EXCEED THE EFFECTIVE DEPTH |
| | DISTANCE, D, NOTED IN TABLE 1807.2.4 AND SHALL BE |
| | MEASURED FROM THE EXPOSED SIDE OF THE WALL TO THE |
| | CENTER OF THE VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT. FOOTINGS FOR |
| | REINFORCED MASONRY RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318. |
| | |
| | 3) COMPLIED. NEW DRAWING DO NOT SHOW WATERPROOFING. |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET LS101_LD INDICATES THIS IS A LEVEL III SITE |
| | PLAN REVIEW LOADING DOCK REVISION. LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE |
| | COPIES NOT SIGNED NOR SEALED BY ANY DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER |
| | DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING |
| | FILED FOR PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND |
| | SEAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE |
| | DOCUMENT. FL ADMIN CODE 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS |
| | |
| | 5) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION |
| | & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| | SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| | FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
