| Date |
Text |
| 2016-01-22 13:37:59 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) (NEW COMMENT) THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS MISSING FROM |
| | THE RESUBMITTAL. IF THE ORIGINAL IS NOT LOCATED A |
| | REPLACEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2) (PREVIOUS COMMENT) THE ENERGY COMPLIANCE FORMS |
| | SPECIFY R-20 CEILING INSULATION AND PLAN SHEET A-302 |
| | HAS R-19 CEILING INSULATION. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 3) (PREVIOUS COMMENT) THE REFERENCES TO THE STANDARDS |
| | ON SHEET S-1 ARE INCORRECT. THEY SHOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: |
| | ACI 318-11, ACI 530-11, ACI 530.1-11, ASCE 5-11, ASCE |
| | 6-11, TMS 402-11 AND TMS 602-11. THE 2011 EDITIONS OF |
| | THESE STANDARDS ARE THE ONES THAT ARE REFERENCED IN |
| | CHAPTER 46 THE FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 4) (NEW COMMENT) THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES |
| | FOR THE WALL AREAS ON SHEET S-1 ARE LOW FOR A TWO STORY |
| | STRUCTURE (25' MEAN ROOF HEIGHT) LOCATED IN EXPOSURE C. |
| | FBC-R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) (PREVIOUS COMMENT) THE WEST ELEVATION DOES NOT MATCH |
| | THE FLOOR PLANS. THE EXTERIOR DOOR (ED 109) TO THE |
| | MASTER BATH IS SHOWN AS A WINDOW AND A WINDOW IS |
| | MISSING. THE SECOND FLOOR PLAN HAS TWO WINDOWS AND THE |
| | ELEVATION HAS THREE. FBC 107.2.1 SEE SHEETS A-100, |
| | A-101, A-201 AND S-7 |
| | |
| | 6) (PREVIOUS COMMENT) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE MASONRY FIREPLACE AND CHIMNEY TO SHOW |
| | THAT IT WILL COMPLY WITH FBC R1001. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS |
| | AND DETAILS OF ALL PARTS AND COMPONENTS. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | PROVIDE FIREBOX, DAMPER, SMOKE CHAMBER DIMENSIONS AND |
| | FLUE DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | 7) (PREVIOUS COMMENT) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. NO |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE EXTERIOR DOORS |
| | OR WINDOWS. THE NOA NUMBERS ON THE LETTER FROM THE |
| | ARCHITECT DO NOT MATCH THE ONES THAT WERE SUBMITTED. |
| | ALSO, LIST ALL OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ON ONE LETTER. |
| | |
| | 8) (PREVIOUS COMMENT) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF THE PRODUCT |
| | EVALUATION REPORT AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE |
| | SPRAY FOAM INSULATION. FBC - R 316 SUBMIT THE PRODUCT |
| | EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE ICYNENE SPRAY FOAM. |
| | |
| | 9) (PREVIOUS COMMENT) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | MANUFACTURES' SPECIFICATIONS WITH INSULATION |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE COLONIAL AND BAHAMA SHUTTERS SHOWN |
| | ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS. FBC 107.2.1 & R301.2.1 THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE BAHAMA SHUTTERS IS EXPIRED AND |
| | NOTHING WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE COLONIAL SHUTTERS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
