| Date |
Text |
| 2016-03-23 15:48:13 | 5TH ELECTRICAL REVIEW NOTES FOR REVISION #:15071022 |
| | REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: 5TH EDITION FBC 2014 & |
| | NFPA 70 2011 (NEC) |
| | |
| | CORRECTIONS REQUIRED: |
| | THOUGH I SPOKE WITH MR. KERRY THE GC AND EXPLAINED TO |
| | HIM WHAT WAS REQUIRED (I READ VERBATIM THE WORDING OF |
| | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW (#4 SINCE THERE HAVE BEEN MANY |
| | DIFFERENT OPTIONS BROUGHT TO THE TABLE FOR |
| | DISCUSSION/APPROVAL, I DO NOT KNOW WHICH IS THE ONE |
| | ACCEPTED. THEREFORE I ASKED FOR A SITE SPECIFIC DRAWING |
| | OF WHAT IS THERE NOW AS WELL AS AN INDICATION OF WHAT |
| | IS TO BE THE PROPOSED FINISHED PRODUCT. THESE DRAWINGS |
| | ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF |
| | ELECTRICAL PERMIT. )) WE AGREED ON WHAT WAS TO BE DONE. |
| | YESTERDAY SOMEONE CAME TO THE OFFICE TO SUBMIT A SINGLE |
| | RISER DIAGRAM THAT INCLUDES ONLY PART OF THE SERVICE |
| | WITH NO SITE PLAN OR SCOPE OF WORK. LOAD CALCS ARE |
| | REQUIRED AS WELL. PER WPB CITY AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC |
| | THE SCOPE OF WORK ALONG WITH THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF |
| | THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DRAWING SHALL APPEAR ON |
| | THE PLANS WITH THE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM AND THE PAGE NUMBER |
| | WHERE THE CORRECTIONS APPEAR ALONG WITH THE STANDARD |
| | CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. MARK VOID |
| | AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR |
| | COMPARATIVE REVIEW. CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE |
| | GREATLY APPRECIATED. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. |
| | |
| | THANK YOU, |
| | MIKE ALBARRAN |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | PH: 561-805-6746 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
