| Date |
Text |
| 2015-12-17 17:29:51 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | NOTE: THE COMMENTS BELOW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. |
| | REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IF |
| | PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED OR IF RE-SUBMITTING |
| | REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE ISSUING THE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1-PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 811 |
| | OF FBC-EXISTING BUILDING, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WITH PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED TO AVOID CONFLICTS OR DELAYS. |
| | (10/1/15 GOT CONFIRMATION FROM FRIEDERIKE MITTNER. THIS |
| | IS A CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC BUILDING. THEREFORE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED. |
| | CALLED CONTRACTOR PAUL NEWMAN TO NOTIFY HIM ABOUT THE |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED ANYWAY. |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED NO TO BE SUBMITTED BECAUSE THE |
| | HOUSE A A TRUE CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC HOUSE. IF |
| | CONTRACTOR WANTS TO SUBMITTED THEM, THEN THEY NEED TO |
| | BE CORRECT. REVISE THE FOLLOWING: |
| | A) REVISE ITEM #1. THIS IS EXISTING BUILDING NOT NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | B) REVISE ITEM #10. R-VALUE TO MATCH PLANS. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | C) REVISE THE ROOF TYPE SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 4. SEE PLANS |
| | AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. THE ROOF TYPE IS NOT HIP. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | D) CLARIFY WHY THE CEILING R-VALUE ON PAGE 2 OF 4 IS |
| | 0.1. SEE ITEM #10 ON COVER PAGE AND ARCHITECTURAL |
| | PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | E) DOOR ORIENTATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4 IS INCORRECT. SEE |
| | PLANS/SURVEY AND REVIEW AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | F) WINDOWS ORIENTATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4 IS INCORRECT. SEE |
| | PLANS AND SURVEY AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | G) COMPLETE THE AIR BARRIER AND INSULATION INSPECTION |
| | SHEET. SEC R405.4.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH |
| | EDITION (2014) |
| | |
| | NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR |
| | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON-THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING |
| | THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | A) PROPOSED ROOF SHINGLES AS SPECIFIED ON THE |
| | ARCHITECT'S PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | B) EXTERIOR SWING DOOR THAT MATCHES DOOR #2 SPECIFIED |
| | BY THE ARCHITECT. AND NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FOR THE CURRENT CODE VERSION 2014. FL15210-R4 SUBMITTED |
| | IS FOR 2010 CODE VERSION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 3- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1 ABOVE AND REVISE |
| | VALUATION AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
