| Date |
Text |
| 2016-05-16 09:21:04 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION(2014). |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | 1- NEED TWO SETS OF PLANS WITH ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL |
| | AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 F.S. ONE OF |
| | THE SETS SUBMITTED IS A COPY. NEED BOTH SETS WITH |
| | ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | 2- ENGINEER OF RECORD IS USING A SEAL THAT READS |
| | "CERTIFICATE". THIS TYPE OF SEAL IS NOT LONGER VALID |
| | SINCE JANUARY 2006. ENGINEER NEEDS TO USE CURRENT SEAL |
| | THAT READS "LICENSE" AS REQUIRED BY 61G15-23.002 F.A.C. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET A-1: |
| | A) NEW BOLD LETTERING AND NUMBERING SHOWN ON ALL PLANS |
| | IS NOT LEGIBLE. LETTERS AND NUMBERS ARE TOO CLOSE |
| | TOGETHER. THEY ARE TOO DIFFICULT TO READ. DRAWINGS ARE |
| | NOT CLEAR FOR RECORD RETENTION PURPOSES. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED PROVIDE LEGIBLE INFORMATION. SEC. 107.2.1.4 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | COMMENT: |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GARAGE DOOR |
| | LEADING TO THE SECOND FLOOR STAIRWAY SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH SEC. R302.5.1 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). NOTE THAT SELF CLOSING DOORS ARE REQUIRED ALSO. |
| | RESPONSE: DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET A-3 STILL DOESN'T |
| | PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR DOOR #7 SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH SEC. R302.5.1. |
| | |
| | COMMENT: |
| | C) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | NEW WINDOW OPENING NEXT TO THE NEW ENTRY DOORS. SPECIFY |
| | OPENING SIZE AND PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING |
| | DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R301. |
| | RESPONSE: THERE ARE NO FRAMING SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | COMMENT: |
| | D) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | NEW STAIRWAY. PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH |
| | EDITION (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: NO FRAMING DETAILS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | COMMENT: |
| | E) MASTER BEDROOM WINDOWS DON'T COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310. (ALSO, CLEARLY SPECIFY EACH |
| | WINDOW TYPE ON THE WINDOW SCHEDULE. SINGLE HUNG, ETC.). |
| | RESPONSE: UNABLE TO VERIFY. INFORMATION ON THE WINDOW |
| | SCHEDULE IS NOT LEGIBLE. BOLD LETTERING IS NOT LEGIBLE. |
| | ALSO, SEE SINGLE HUNG PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR |
| | SIZE OF WINDOW SPECIFIED. IT LOOKS LIKE A 24 SINGLE |
| | HUNG WINDOW DOESN'T COMPLY. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S CUT |
| | SHEET SHOWING THAT THE SPECIFIED WINDOW MEETS THE TOTAL |
| | CLEAR HEIGHT OF 24" AND TOTAL CLEAR OPENING OF 5.7 S.F. |
| | |
| | COMMENT: |
| | F) SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS. SIZE AND LOCATION TO COMPLY |
| | WITH SEC. R807. |
| | RESPONSE: INFORMATION SHOWN ON SECOND FLOOR PLAN IS NOT |
| | LEGIBLE. UNABLE TO VERIFY SIZE. |
| | |
| | COMMENT: |
| | 4- SPECIFY CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM BY ALL BEDROOMS ( |
| | PROPOSED AND EXISTING) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315. |
| | RESPONSE: NEED TO PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS WITH 10 FETT OF |
| | ALL EXISTING BEDROOMS. |
| | |
| | COMMENT: |
| | 5- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1106 |
| | OF FBC-EXISTING BUILDING, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE PLANS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS AND UNNECESSARY DELAYS. |
| | RESPONSE: A) PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION |
| | ON TOP OF FORM R405-2014 SUBMITTED. PROVIDE BUILDER'S |
| | NAME AND THE JURISDICTION NUMBER IS INCORRECT. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, |
| | 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014) INCLUDING: |
| | (1)INSPECTION CHECKLIST, (2) NAME OF PERSON PREPARING |
| | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS, |
| | |
| | C) OWNER/AGENT TO CERTIFY BOTTOM OF FORM AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | D) BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD SUBMITTED. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | COMMENT: |
| | 6-SHEET A-2: WINDOWS AND DOORS DESIGN PRESSURES DON'T |
| | CORRESPOND TO EXPOSURE"C". REVISE ALL THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES AS REQUIRED. SEC. R301. |
| | RESPONSE: DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS |
| | ARE NOT LEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | COMMENT: |
| | 7- SHEET A-3: |
| | A) SPECIFY THE INTERNAL PRESSURES COEFFICIENT. AND, |
| | CLARIFY WHAT'S ASCI 7.05? DO YOU MEAN ASCE? . ( NOTE: |
| | FBC 2014 REFERENCES THE ASCE 7-10 NOT ASCE-05). SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT.. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | B) CLEARLY SPECIFY ALL DEAD AND LIVE LOADS, INCLUDING |
| | THE ATTIC LIVE LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY NOTES "B" AND |
| | "G" OF TABLE R301.5. NOTE: CLEARLY SPECIFY THE LOADS |
| | FOR SECOND FLOOR, ROOF, ETC. |
| | RESPONSE: COORDINATE INFORMATION GIVEN HERE WITH |
| | INFORMATION GIVEN ON SHEET RE-NAMED "SITE". SEE ITEM # |
| | 8(2) BELOW. |
| | |
| | C) SPECIFY ON THE TYPICAL WALL SECTION THE MIN. FOOTING |
| | DEPTH AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R404.16. NOTE: SIZE OF |
| | FOUNDATION ON SHEET A-1 MAY NEED TO BE REVISED. |
| | COORDINATE WITH FINISH GRADE ITEM ABOVE. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT.NOT ADDRESSED. NOTE: "TYPICAL |
| | FOOTER CONSTRUCTION" SPECIFIES 14" X 24" CONCRETE |
| | MONOLITHIC FOOTER. THIS SIZE OF FOOTING DOESN'T MATCH |
| | SIZE SPECIFIED ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN AND IT DOESN'T |
| | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 12" MIN. FOOTING DEPTH. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | D) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY THE ROOF TILE |
| | FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.2.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. IF USING NAILS, THEN SPECIFY TYPE, |
| | SIZE AND NUMBER OF NAILS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | E) REVISE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS ON |
| | TYPICAL WALL SECTION. SEC. R803.2.3.1 REQUIRES RING |
| | SHANK NAILS. |
| | RESPONSE: THERE ARE TWO OPTIONS SPECIFIED. RING SHANK |
| | NAILS ARE REQUIRED. OTHERWISE, ENGINEER TO PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT THE 8D COMMON NAILS SPECIFIED |
| | ON THE SECOND OPTION PROVIDE THE SAME RESISTANCE AS THE |
| | 8D RING SHANK NAILS. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE INFORMATION WITH NOTE #45 ON SHEET |
| | RE-NAMED "SITE". |
| | |
| | F) "TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION" NOTE SHOWN ON |
| | TYP. WALL SECTION DOESN'T MATCH LOCATION AND TYPE OF |
| | COLUMNS SHOWN ON FOUNDATION PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | COMMENT: |
| | 8- SHEET S-1: (1) NEED TO PROVIDE ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| | INFORMATION AND DRAWING NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED. |
| | THIS SHEET CONTAINS STRUCTURAL SPECIFICATIONS. CHAPTER |
| | 471 F. S. THIS SHEET CONTAINS STRUCTURAL |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. (2) UPDATE ALL NOTES REFERENCING THE |
| | CURRENT 2014 FBC. |
| | RESPONSE: SHEET WAS RENAMED AS SITE: |
| | (1) REVISE NOTE #2. THERE IS NOT ASCE 2014. |
| | |
| | (2) REVISE LOADS SPECIFIED ON NOTE #6. ROOF DEAD LOAD |
| | APPEARS TO BE TOO LOW FOR THE TYPE OF ROOFING MATERIAL |
| | TO BE USED. ALSO, CLARIFY WHY ARE THERE TWO DIFFERENT |
| | ATTIC LIVE LOADS.. |
| | |
| | COMMENT: |
| | 9- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | A) GARAGE DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: MIAMI-DADE NOA 14-0204.08 DOESN'T MEET THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | B) FLAT ROOF OVER NEW ENTRY. AND, CLEARLY MARK SELECTED |
| | APPROVED ASSEMBLY. IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET |
| | THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES, THEN NEED TO SUBMIT |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS (IF THE SELECTED |
| | ASSEMBLY ALLOWS IT). |
| | RESPONSE: NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | C) SOLATUBE SKYLIGHTS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL11480-R4 SUBMITTED |
| | IS FOR 2010 FBC AND WAS VALIDATED NOT APPROVED. IN |
| | ADDITION THE MIAMI-DADE NOA 03-1016.01 SUBMITTED |
| | EXPIRED IN NOVEMBER 13, 2009. NEED TO PROVIDE |
| | CURRENT/APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | D) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. AND CLEARLY |
| | SPECIFY/MARK MULLION SIZE TO VERIFY THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES. |
| | RESPONSE: NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO APPROVE IN WRITING (NOT |
| | SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: RESPONSE LETTER SAID:: "SEE ATTACHED LETTER". |
| | THERE WAS NO ATTACHED LETTER IN THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PACKAGE. NOTE: IF ENGINEER IS PROVIDING A LETTER |
| | INSTEAD OF PROVIDING REVIEW STAMP ON EACH PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL, THEN CLEARLY IDENTIFY EACH PRODUCT FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER, NOA NUMBER AND SPECIFIC MODEL |
| | FOR EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEWED. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ***PLEASE REPLACE AND REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET. SUBMIT |
| | OLD COPIES FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
