| Date |
Text |
| 2016-02-10 11:32:15 | ****PROVISOS**** |
| | ****REVISION REQUIRED PRIOR TO DECK FLOOR |
| | INSTALLATION**** |
| | ****ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S RISK**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | PLAN PREPARED BY VJ GERLEY, PE DATED 2/5/2016: |
| | |
| | 1. FBC 107.2.1: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF |
| | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND |
| | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT |
| | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND |
| | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS ... |
| | |
| | IN ORDER FOR AN ACCURATE REVIEW TO BE PERFORMED, |
| | PROVIDE BASIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE EXISTING BUILDING: |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FBC CHAPTER 3, BUILDING TYPE |
| | FBC CHAPTER 5. |
| | |
| | 2. FBC 5TH EDITION EXISTING BUILDING 301.1, APPLICANT |
| | IS TO ELECT THE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE. REVISE PLAN TO |
| | INDICATE METHOD SELECTED. COMPLETE CODE REFERENCES |
| | CANNOT BE PROVIDED WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 3. SCOPE NOT CLEAR. SECTION 1-6 STATES THAT ELECTRICAL |
| | WIRING MAY BE REUSED BUT NO ELECTRICAL PLAN WAS |
| | SUBMITTED, NO ELECTRICAL APPLICATION SUBMITTED, FBC |
| | 107. |
| | |
| | 4. REGARDING THE PARTITION WALLS, NO SPECIFICATION |
| | (OTHER THAN "REPLACE WITH REPAIR EQUAL TO EXISTING") |
| | WAS PROVIDED. THIS IS A WALL SUBJECT TO WIND LOADS. |
| | BUILDING "E" ELEVATION INDICATES THAT THE WALL IS TO |
| | REMAIN. |
| | |
| | ALL OF THE DETAIL NUMBERS HAVE BEEN REMOVED. THERE ARE |
| | SOME REFERENCES TO DETAILS BUT THE DETAILS THEMSELVES |
| | ARE NOT IDENTIFIED, FBC 107. |
| | |
| | FIRST FLOOR CMU PARTITION WALL DOES NOT APPEAR IN |
| | PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING, PLAN INDICATES |
| | REPLACEMENT IF NECESSARY, REVISE TO PROPOSE NEW OR |
| | REMOVE. |
| | |
| | 5. THE PLAN IS NOT CLEAR AS TO SCOPE, FBC 107. BUILDING |
| | ORIENTATION HAS NOT BEEN INDICATED, DETAILS DO NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH PLAN OR ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | 6. FBC 1609, SECTION 1-12 STATES "WIND PRESSURES |
| | DESIGNED FOR OPEN STRUCTURE", BUT THIS STRUCTURE DOES |
| | NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF OPEN, SEE FBC 1609, |
| | ASCE7-10, CHAPTER 26. REVISE ENCLOSURE CLASSIFICATION |
| | AND REVISE OTHER DETAILS AS APPLICABLE OR CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 7. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS GIVEN AS 24 FEET. BUILDING 'E' |
| | ELEVATION DEPICTS THREE STORIES AND A PITCHED ROOF. |
| | SECTION C SPECS A 12IN FLOOR JOIST. IT APPEARS THAT 24 |
| | FEET IS NOT AN ACCURATE MRH FOR THIS STRUCTURE AS IT IS |
| | 26FT FROM FINISHED FLOOR TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF TRUSSES, |
| | NO DIMENSION PROVIDED FOR THE ROOF. EITHER CORRECT THE |
| | MRH OR PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CLARIFY THE STATED MRH OF |
| | 24FT. |
| | |
| | 8. FBC 1809.4, TYPICAL WALL SECTION DOES NOT SPECIFY |
| | DEPTH OF FOUNDATION RELATIVE TO GRADE, REVISE. |
| | |
| | 9. BALCONY DESIGN LOADS NOT SPECIFIED, PLEASE REVISE, |
| | FBC 107. |
| | |
| | 10. RAILING ENGINEERING IS A PHOTOCOPY AND NOT REVIEWED |
| | BY ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED FOR DELEGATED |
| | ENGINEERING, FAC61G. PROVIDE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED |
| | ORIGINAL ENGINEERING WITH THE REVISED PLAN. |
| | |
| | 11. ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS ARE NOT MARKED RELATIVE TO |
| | DIRECTION. SECTION 3 APPEARS TO BE THE REAR (BASED ON |
| | ROOF ORIENTATION). IF THIS IS A SECTION WHICH |
| | REPRESENTS THE REAR, CONSTRUCTION/REPAIR OF THE |
| | CANTILEVER TO THE SIDES IS NOT CLEAR. IT APPEARS THAT |
| | NO REPAIR DETAIL WAS PROVIDED FOR THE SECOND FLOOR LEFT |
| | AND RIGHT SIDE CANTILEVERED BALCONY AREAS, FBC 107. |
| | |
| | 12. A FLASHING SPECIFICATION PROVIDED, BUT TYPICAL WALL |
| | SECTION AND UNNUMBERED SECTION (PREVIOUSLY SECTION 3) |
| | GRAPHICALLY APPEAR TO DEPICT FLASHING ON THE SECOND |
| | FLOOR, BUT NOT ON THE THIRD FLOOR. FBC 1403.2, REVISE |
| | PLAN TO EITHER INCLUDE FLASHING ON THE THIRD FLOOR OR |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS TO CLARIFY HOW AN INSTALLATION WHICH |
| | LACKS FLASHING WILL NOT COMPROMISE THE WATER RESISTANCE |
| | OF THE EXTERIOR WALL. |
| | |
| | 13. THE WIND INFORMATION SPECIFIES "OVERHANGS" DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE OF -0 FOR ZONE 1. IS "OVERHANGS" THE |
| | BALCONIES? PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE NEGATIVE |
| | PRESSURE OF -0 FOR ZONE 1, FBC 1609. |
| | |
| | 14. FBC 107, PLAN SPECIFIES HARDIBOARD SOFFITS, SECTION |
| | 6-2 SPECIFIES PLYWOOD, CLARIFY. REMOVE ANY OTHER |
| | DISCREPANCIES FROM THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 15. ENGINEER SPECIFIES DECTEC OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD. |
| | |
| | SEE DECTEC PRODUCT APPROVAL, 5/8" TONGUE AND GROOVE |
| | PLYWOOD GLUED WITH LEPAGE BULLDOG GRIP PL 400 HEAVY |
| | DUTY SUB FLOOR ADHESIVE, #8 WOOD SCREWS AT 6" OC |
| | REQUIRED. THIS ASSEMBLY HAS A DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | LIMITATION OF -135PSF. ZONE 3 ON THE PLAN HAS A DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE REQUIREMENT OF -137.2. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY THE |
| | ENGINEER SPECIFIES A PRODUCT WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY HIM. EXISTING BALCONY |
| | FLOOR JOIST SPACING IS NOT STATED ON THE SECTIONS SO IT |
| | IS NOT CLEAR IF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS COMPLY WITH THE |
| | 24IN OC REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | THIS DISCREPANCY (TONGUE AND GROOVE VS. STANDARD), |
| | JOIST SPACING, AND DESIGN PRESSURE LIMITATION OF THE |
| | DECTEC IS TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE |
| | BALCONY FLOORS. A SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL CAN BE |
| | CONSIDERED SUBJECT TO INFORMATION (ENGINEERING |
| | RATIONALE), COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS, ETC. PROVIDED BY |
| | ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | 16. THE ARTISAN LAP SIDING NOA IS FOR SIDING AND DOES |
| | NOT INCLUDE INFORMATION FOR FASCIA INSTALLATION. |
| | PROVIDE THE APPLICABLE PRODUCT APPROVAL, REVIEWED BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD, FBC 1609, FBC 107. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
