| Date |
Text |
| 2015-10-13 15:54:48 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 BUILDING |
| | PERMIT #15061348 |
| | 10/13/15 |
| | |
| | 1) COMMENT #1 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW WAS NOT ADDRESSED. I |
| | AM REPRINTING IT HERE FOR REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE: (THE |
| | SUBMITTED SOIL TESTING AND ENGINEERING REPORT FROM |
| | ALTERRA IS INCOMPLETE (SUBJECT: DEMUCKING |
| | INTERVENTION). REFER TO PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE COVER LETTER |
| | AND SUBMIT COPIES OF THE FEBRUARY/2015 GEOTECHNICAL |
| | REPORT WHICH, ACCORDING TO THE LETTER, PROVIDES |
| | "RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BEARING-GRADE PREPARATION" OF THE |
| | SOIL. THE COMPLETE REPORT SHALL INCLUDE AMONG OTHER |
| | THINGS, A DIMENSIONED DRAWING OF THE AREA(S) OF THE LOT |
| | THAT WERE DEMUCKED (WAS THE POOL INCLUDED?), THE CLEAN |
| | SAND FILL AND COMPACTION PROCEDURE, AND ESTABLISH THE |
| | LOAD BEARING VALUE OF THE SOIL- REFER TO SECTIONS |
| | R401.4 AND R506 FBC-10 RESIDENTIAL). |
| | 2) WHEN RE-SUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE REMOVE THE DEFICIENT |
| | PLANS AND INSERT THE CORRECTED PLANS INTO THE PLAN |
| | SETS. THE END RESULT SHOULD BE TWO COMPLETE SETS OF |
| | PLANS- CURRENTLY THERE ARE 8 PARTIAL SETS IN THE FILE. |
| | 3) THERE ARE THREE DIFFERENT FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION |
| | HEIGHTS SHOWN IN THE PLANS- SEE SHEETS SP-1, S-0, & S-1 |
| | AND CORRECT |
| | 4) SHEET S-2.1: THE REVISED PLANS INDICATE 42" DEEP |
| | LINTELS AND 8"X12" TIE BEAMS ABOVE THE GARAGE DOOR |
| | OPENINGS WITH A FINISHED WALL HEIGHT OF 10'0". THIS |
| | WOULD LEAVE THE GARAGE DOOR HEADER HEIGHTS AT 66" ABOVE |
| | FINISHED FLOOR FOR AN 8' HIGH DOOR. ADDITIONALLY, THE |
| | ELEVATION DRAWING INDICATES ARCHED OPENINGS AT THESE |
| | LOCATIONS. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | 5) S-3.4: AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR |
| | L-28. |
| | 6) A-4: AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED IN THE 1ST REVIEW, |
| | REFER TO SECTION R703.6.3: WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIERS. |
| | WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED |
| | IN SECTION R703.2 AND, WHERE APPLIED OVER WOOD-BASED |
| | SHEATHING, SHALL INCLUDE A WATER-RESISTIVE |
| | VAPOR-PERMEABLE BARRIER WITH A PERFORMANCE AT LEAST |
| | EQUIVALENT TO TWO LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER. THE |
| | INDIVIDUAL LAYERS SHALL BE INSTALLED INDEPENDENTLY SUCH |
| | THAT EACH LAYER PROVIDES A SEPARATE CONTINUOUS PLANE |
| | AND ANY FLASHING INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION |
| | R703.8) INTENDED TO DRAIN TO THE WATER-RESISTIVE |
| | BARRIER IS DIRECTED BETWEEN THE LAYERS. THE PLAN IS |
| | INDICATING ONLY ONE LAYER OF GRADE D PAPER. |
| | 7) COMMENT #21 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW WAS NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | A-4: PROVIDE ROUGH FRAMING AND EXTERIOR FINISH DETAILS |
| | FOR THE COVERED ENTRY AND OUTDOOR KITCHEN CEILINGS). |
| | 8) COMMENT #23 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW NOT ADDRESS: E-1: |
| | CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 10' |
| | OF EACH BEDROOM- SECTION R315.1. |
| | |
| | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6719 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
