| Date |
Text |
| 2015-12-30 19:07:01 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | ****NOTE: |
| | COMMENTS BELOW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS THAT OWNER/BUILDER MAY OBTAIN PERMIT IF OTHER |
| | TRADES PASS THEIR REVIEWS. AND, THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE |
| | ADDRESSED AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED AND BEFORE |
| | INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED.. REVISION FEES WILL APPLY. |
| | OWNER/BUILDER TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION IS MISSING FROM PACKAGE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- SHEET 5 OF 6: |
| | A) CLEARLY SPECIFY THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD ON THE DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA. SEE FOOTNOTES "B" AND "G" OF TABLE R301.5 AND |
| | REVISE DESIGN CRITERIA AS REQUIRED. |
| | RESPONSE: THE ROOF BCLL WAS REVISED TO SAY 20PSF, BUT |
| | THERE IS A NOTE STATING THAT "10PSF BCLL |
| | NON-CONCURRENT". THERE IS A CONFLICT ON THIS STATEMENT. |
| | IF THE BCLL IS 20PSF, THEN THE NON-CONCURRENT LIVE LOAD |
| | IS 20PSF NOT 10PSF. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE THE EXPOSURE SPECIFIED ON THE DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA. BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT "B". |
| | SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2010 FBC. |
| | |
| | 2- TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET 3 OF 6: |
| | A) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT NAIL TYPES AND SPACING SPECS |
| | FOR THE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1. |
| | RESPONSE: WALL SECTION STILL SHOWS TWO DIFFERENT NAILS. |
| | 10D RING SHANK NAILS AND 10D NAILS. SPECIFY ONLY ONE |
| | TYPE. NOTE: RING SHANK NAILS ARE REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R803.2.3.1. |
| | |
| | 3- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A) OWNER/AGENT TO CERTIFY CODE COMPLIANCE AT BOTTOM OF |
| | FORM SUBMITTED. SEC. 103.2.3.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | B) CONDITIONED AREA DOESN'T MATCH PLANS . REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | C) ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 5 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D) REVISE DOOR TYPE SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 OF 5. THERE ARE |
| | NOT WOOD DOORS. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED. AND, |
| | SEE COMMENT BELOW. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E) ENTRY DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15210.6 SUBMITTED IS |
| | FOR DOORS WITH GLAZING. THIS DOORS NEED TO BE ENTERED |
| | IN THE WINDOWS SECTIONS NOT DOORS. SEE SEC. 405.5.3 OF |
| | 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION ANDS REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | F) COMPLETE THE FLORIDA CODE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST PAGE |
| | 5 OF 5 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 405.4.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | G) COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY |
| | CARD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 405.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR |
| | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING |
| | THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.0002(33) FOR: |
| | A) PRECAST LINTELS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT AN APPROVED |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. (REPEAT COMMENT. THREE TIMES). |
| | |
| | B) SLIDING GLASS DOORS AS SHOWN ON SHEET A-3 BY THE |
| | DINING ROOM AREA. THERE IS NOT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOORS IN THE RE-SUBMITTED PACKAGE. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | C) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. INFORMATION FROM JELD-WEN |
| | SUBMITTED DOESN'T HAVE A FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NUMBER. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER |
| | THAT CORRESPONDS TO PACKAGE SUBMITTED. |
| | RESPONSE: SAME PACKAGE RE-SUBMITTED. COMMENT NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | D) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD. SEE ITEM #6 BELOW. NOTE: SEE ROOF TILE NOA |
| | 11-0510.02 SUBMITTED FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. PROVIDE THAT |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 6- ROOFING FINISH MATERIAL WAS CHANGED FROM SHINGLES TO |
| | CONCRETE TILE. DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO SPECIFY HOW |
| | IS THE TILE GOING TO BE INSTALLED (ADHESIVE OR |
| | SCREWS/NAILS) TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES OF SEC. R301 OF 2010 FBC. IF USING |
| | SCREWS/NAILS, THEN SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER REQUIRED TO |
| | MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE SOIL TEST REPORT AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R401.4 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED NEED TO HAVE |
| | ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY |
| | CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE WHEN SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS |
| | FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. |
| | |
| | 8- SHEET 5 OF 6: |
| | A) ROOF FRAMING PLAN IS MISSING THE CONNECTOR AT THE |
| | END OF SOME GIRDER TRUSSES. CIRCLE DENOTING CONNECTOR |
| | IS IN BLANK. SPECIFY CONNECTOR AT BOTH ENDS OF GIRDER |
| | TRUSSES. SEC. R301. |
| | |
| | B) CONNECTOR #2 SPECIFIED FOR GIRDER TRUSS A15G NEEDS |
| | TO BE REVISED. THIS IS A TWO PLY GIRDER TRUSS. REVISE |
| | THE NUMBER OF CONNECTORS REQUIRED FOR A TWO PLY TRUSS |
| | AND SPECIFY THE CORRECT SIZE OF NAIL ACCORDING TO THE |
| | NUMBER OF TRUSSES. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR CONNECTOR |
| | HHETA AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R301. |
| | |
| | 9- TRUSS ENGINEER TO REVISE TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED: |
| | A) ALL INDIVIDUAL TRUSS DRAWINGS NEED A TITLE BLOCK |
| | WITH THE ENGINEER NAME, ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER AND |
| | THE DATE OF THE DRAWING AS REQUIRED BY 1G15-31.003 OF |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD TO COMPLY WITH FOOTNOTES |
| | "B" AND "G" OF TABLE R301.5 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NEED 20PSF ATTIC LIVE LOAD. SEE PLANS AND TABLE R301.5. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | **** PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | **** PLEASE REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET. SUBMIT OLD COPIES |
| | FOR REFERENCE. DON"T STAPLE OLD COPIES TO NEW REVISED |
| | SET. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
