Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 15061317
Permit Number 15061317
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2015-11-10 17:38:03NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), SECOND BUILDING
 REVIEW CHECKLIST.
 CODE: 2010 FBC.
  
  
 NOTE: PACKAGE RE-SUBMITTED IS MISSING:
 A) THE PERMIT APPLICATION.
 B) THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS.
 C) THE SOIL TEST REPORT.
  
  
 1- PLANS NEED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED AND WITH ORIGINAL
 SEAL AND SIGNATURE BY THE ENGINEERS SHOWN ON THE TITLE
 BLOCK AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES WHEN
 SUBMITTING DRAWINGS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. NOTE: THERE ARE
 TWO DIFFERENT PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ON THE TILE BLOCK
 OF DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS AN
 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND A MEP ENGINEER. DRAWINGS NEED
 TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER RESPONSIBLE FOR
 EACH DESIGN.
 RESPONSE: INFORMATION ON PLANS SUBMITTED SHOW WHITE
 OUT. PLANS WITH WHITE OUT ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR PUBLIC
 RECORDS. ORIGINAL PLANS NEED TO BE REVISED SHOWING ONLY
 THE INFORMATION OF THE ENGINEER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
 DESIGN. AND, SIGN AND SEAL NEW COPIES ACCORDINGLY.
  
 2- SHEET A-1:
 A) REVISE THE DESIGN DATA SHOWN ON THE FOOTING NOTES.
 THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT EXPOSURE
 "B". SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. AND
 REVISE ALL THE DESIGN PRESSURES ON SHEET A-5
 ACCORDINGLY.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SHEET A-1 WAS
 NOT REVISED.
  
 B) REVISE THE PROJECT INFORMATION & DESIGN CRITERIA.
 THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT EXPOSURE
 "C". SEC. R301.2.1.4.3 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. AND
 REVISE ALL THE DESIGN PRESSURES ACCORDINGLY.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SHEET A-1 WAS
 NOT REVISED.
  
 C) PROJECT INFORMATION & DESIGN CRITERIA: SPECIFY THE
 ULTIMATE WIND LOAD AND THE NOMINAL WIND LOAD. SEC.
 R301.2.1.3.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SHEET A-1 WAS
 NOT REVISED.
  
 D) CLEARLY SPECIFY THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD ON THE PROJECT
 INFORMATION & DESIGN CRITERIA. SEE FOOTNOTES "B" AND
 "G" OF TABLE R301.5 AND REVISE DESIGN CRITERIA AS
 REQUIRED.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SHEET A-1 WAS
 NOT REVISED.
  
 3- TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-2:
 A) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT NAIL TYPES AND SPACING SPECS
 FOR THE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1.
 NOTE: ALSO, COORDINATE WITH ROOF SHEATHING
 SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN THE "ROOF SHEATHING DETAIL" AND "
 FLOOR & ROOF SHEATHING FASTENER DETAIL" ON SHEET A-4.
  
 RESPONSE: THERE IS NO COORDINATION BETWEEN INFORMATION
 SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL WALL SECTION AND INFORMATION SHOWN
 ON SHEET A-4. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY RING SHANK NAIL
 MIN. AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1.
  
 B) PROVIDE SPECS FOR WALL FINISH. "TO MATCH EXIST.
 FINISH" DOESN'T APPLY. THERE IS NOT EXISTING FINISH.
 THIS IS A NEW HOUSE. SEC. R701.
 RESPONSE: FINISH SPECIFICATIONS WERE NOT REVISED.
  
 C) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND
 SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE STONE VENEER AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R703.7 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY ALL THE
 FASTENERS, ETC.
  
 4- SHEET A-3:
 A) FLOOR PLAN IS NOT LEGIBLE. IT'S TOO DARK LETTERING
 AND NUMBERS ARE HARD TO READ. PLAN IS NOT CLEAR FOR
 SCANNING AND FILING PURPOSES. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC.
 107.2.1.4 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 RESPONSE: SAME DRAWING WAS RE-SUBMITTED. NEW CLEAR AND
 LEGIBLE DRAWING WAS NOT SUBMITTED AND THERE IS WHITE
 OUT OVER THE PREVIOUS ENGINEER INFORMATION. WHITE OUT
 IS NOT ACCEPTABLE ON ANY DRAWING.
  
 B) SIZE OF ATTIC ACCESS SHOWN BY THE LAUNDRY AREA
 DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC. R807. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 C) PROVIDE A BATHROOM WITH A DOOR SIZE THAT COMPLIES
 WITH SEC. R320.1.1.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 D) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ANCHOR FASTENING
 SPACING OF THE GARAGE DOOR STRUCTURAL BUCK. IT'S NOT
 THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R301.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 5- ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET A-4: PROVIDE COMPLETE
 ROOF FRAMING PLAN. SPECIFY ALL BEAMS AND LINTELS.
 SPECIFY ALL ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS AND CONNECTORS. SEC.
 R301.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 6- SHEET A-5:
 A) CODE ANALYSIS INFORMATION SHOWN ON TOP OF THE SHEET
 IS INCORRECT. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED. THE 2010 FBC EXISTING BUILDING CODE AND
 ALTERATION LEVEL 2 DON'T APPLY. THIS IS NEW
 CONSTRUCTION.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 B) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 SCREENED PORCH SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R301.
 RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 7- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
 NOTE: ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE MISSING FROM THE
 RE-SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. UNABLE TO VERIFY IF REVISIONS
 WERE DONE.
  
 A) CONDITIONED AREA DOESN'T MATCH PLANS . REVISE AS
 REQUIRED. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 B) COORDINATE TYPE OF DOORS WITH PLANS AND PRODUCT
 APPROVALS SUBMITTED. SEC. 103.2.2 OF 2010 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 8- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 FAC 61G20-3.0002(33) FOR:
 A) GARAGE DOORS THAT MEETS THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR
 EXPOSURE "D" AS REQUIRED BY ITEM #2 ABOVE.
 RESPONSE: ENGINEER DIDN'T REVISE THE DESIGN PRESSURES
 FOR EXPOSURE "D". NEED REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES TO
 CHECK PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 B) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. ENGINEER OF
 RECORD TO REVISE DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY ITEM #2
 ABOVE.
 RESPONSE: ENGINEER DIDN'T REVISE THE DESIGN PRESSURES
 FOR EXPOSURE "D". NEED REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES TO
 CHECK PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 C) FIXED WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 RESPONSE: ENGINEER DIDN'T REVISE THE DESIGN PRESSURES
 FOR EXPOSURE "D". NEED REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES TO
 CHECK PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 D) GARAGE SIDE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 RESPONSE: ENGINEER DIDN'T REVISE THE DESIGN PRESSURES
 FOR EXPOSURE "D". NEED REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES TO
 CHECK PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 E) PRECAST LINTELS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 RESPONSE: INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT AN APPROVED
 PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 F) ALL TRUSS STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS..
 NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER
 PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR
 ENGINEER OF RECORD TO LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL
 NEXT TO THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR.
 RESPONSE: COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 G) ENTRY DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 RESPONSE: ENGINEER DIDN'T REVISE THE DESIGN PRESSURES
 FOR EXPOSURE "D". NEED REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES TO
 CHECK PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED.
  
 H) SLIDING GLASS DOORS AS SHOWN ON SHEET A-3 BY THE
 DINING ROOM AREA. THERE IS NOT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR
 SLIDING GLASS DOORS IN THE RE-SUBMITTED PACKAGE.
  
 I) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. INFORMATION FROM JELD-WEN
 SUBMITTED DOESN'T HAVE A FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL
 NUMBER. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER
 THAT CORRESPONDS TO PACKAGE SUBMITTED.
  
 9- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 10- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE SOIL TEST REPORT AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R401.4 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 11- TRUSS ENGINEER TO REVISE TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED:
 A) THE DESIGN CRITERIA IS INCORRECT. THIS BUILDING IS
 LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT EXPOSURE "B". REVISE
 COMPLETE TRUSS PACKAGE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R301.2.1.4.3
 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 B) TRUSS PACKAGE COVER SHEET DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC.
 61G15-31.003 OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: MISSING
 ENGINEER OF RECORD INFORMATION, THE BUILDING WAS
 DESIGNED BASED ON THE 2010 FBC NOT 2014 FBC,
  
 C) ALL INDIVIDUAL TRUSS DRAWINGS NEED A TITLE BLOCK
 WITH THE ENGINEER NAME, ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER AND
 THE DATE OF THE DRAWING AS REQUIRED BY 1G15-31.003 OF
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
  
 D) REVISE THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD TO COMPLY WITH FOOTNOTES
 "B" AND "G" OF TABLE R301.5 OF 2010 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 **** PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
 **** PLEASE REMOVE ANY REVISED SHEET. SUBMIT OLD COPIES
 FOR REFERENCE. DON"T STAPLE OLD COPIES TO NEW REVISED
 SET.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved