| Date |
Text |
| 2015-09-24 12:55:46 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 BUILDING |
| | PERMIT #15061203 |
| | 9/24/15 |
| | |
| | SEVERAL COMMENTS FROM THE 1ST REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED |
| | SINGLE FAMILY HOME PROJECT WERE NOT ADDRESSED AND STILL |
| | EXIST. THOSE COMMENTS WILL BE REFERENCED AND REPRINTED |
| | BELOW ALONG WITH ADDITIONAL REMARKS. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE WCI REPONSE NARRATIVE SENT WITH |
| | THE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSSED ONLY COMMENTS 2 & 11. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE NARRATIVE RESPONSE TO THIS |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 1) COMMENT #2: "GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REQUIRED FOR |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING. SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A |
| | SOIL TEST AND REPORT SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA |
| | LICENSED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER- SECTION R401.4 FBC-10 |
| | RESIDENTIAL." IN RESPONSE TO THIS COMMENT I RECEIVED A |
| | DENSITY REPORT FOR THE BUILDING PAD. PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| | REQUESTED SOIL REPORT, AND ALSO CLARIFY HOW A DENSITY |
| | TEST CAN BE PERFORMED BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT IS |
| | ISSUED AND A FOUNDATION PAD HAS BEEN DUG OUT? |
| | 2) COMMENT #6: "S-1A: THE SPACINGS OF THE #5 VERTICAL |
| | REINFORCEMENT BARS (REBAR) ON THE MAIN HOUSE AND GARAGE |
| | EXTERIOR MASONRY WALLS ARE EXCEEDING THE ALLOWABLE |
| | MAXIMUMS AS DETERMINED BY TABLE R609.3.3A-1. PLEASE |
| | REDUCE THE SPACING PER THE TABLE REQUIREMENTS." THE |
| | REVISED PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY CORRECTIONS TO THE 8' |
| | SPACINGS. PLEASE NOTE THAT INTERPOLATION BETWEEN THE |
| | 130 AND 140 TABLE CATEGORIES WILL BE NECESSARY TO |
| | ARRIVE AT CORRECT SPACINGS. |
| | 3) COMMENT #9: "S-4A: DETAIL 9/S4- INDICATE THE |
| | SPECIES, GRADE, SIZE, AND SPACING OF WOOD STUDS FOR THE |
| | GARAGE/LIVING COMMON WALL. SPECIFY PRESSURE TREATED FOR |
| | THE BOTTOM PLATE" THE DETAIL WAS NOT REVISED. |
| | 4) COMMENT #10: "S-4A: DETAIL 4/S4 & 5/S4- INDICATE THE |
| | TYPE OF WEATHER AND WATER RESISTANT FINISH TO BE |
| | ATTACHED TO THE WOOD FRAMED GABLE WALLS. REFER TO |
| | SECTION R703 AND R703.6 FOR EXTERIOR PLASTER (STUCCO), |
| | AND R703.6.3 FOR WATER-RESISTANT BARRIER MATERIAL. |
| | REVISE THE DETAIL ACCORDINGLY." ALTHOUGH THERE IS A NEW |
| | NOTE ADDRESSING STUCCO FINISH FOR THE GABLES ON SHEET |
| | 3A, PLEASE PLACE THE NOTES ON THE DETAIL AS PREVIOUSLY |
| | REQUESTED. |
| | 5) COMMENT #15: "PRODUCT APPROVALS AND MIAMI-DADE |
| | NOA'S: A) THE GARAGE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL FL 09174-R7 |
| | IS OUTDATED FOR 2010- PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF FL |
| | 09174-R9. B) ENTRY DOOR FL 8871.5-R4 IS OUTDATED FOR |
| | 2010- PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF FL 8871.5-R6. C) THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD SHALL CIRCLE, HIGHLIGHT, OR |
| | OTHERWISE MARK ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS, NOTES, DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES, GLASS TYPES, ANCHORING SCHEDULES ETC. ON THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS AND NOA'S FOR THE WINDOWS, SLIDER |
| | DOORS, ENTRY DOORS, AND TILE ROOFING. PLEASE SUBMIT |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR TILE UNDERLAYMENT AND FOAM |
| | ADHESIVE IF APPLICABLE TO THE TILE ROOF INSTALLATION." |
| | IN RESPONSE TO THIS COMMENT TWOL ISSUES NOT RESOLVED: |
| | A) THE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS NOT MARKED TO |
| | INDICATE A MECHANICAL OR FOAM ADHESIVE INSTALLATION, |
| | AND A PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE ADHESIVE WAS NOT |
| | SUBMIITTED. B) NOA'S FOR THE PGT FIXED WINDOWS WERE NOT |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6719 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
