| Date |
Text |
| 2015-08-05 08:30:56 | PLEASE NOTE THAT I, MIKE ALBARRAN, ELECTRICAL PLANS |
| | EXAMINER HAVE COMPLETED THE REVIEW OF THE ABOVE |
| | MENTIONED JOB. BELOW ARE THE COMMENTS WITH REGARDS TO |
| | THE REQUIRED CORRECTIONS. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE |
| | CORRECTED AND THE PLANS RESUBMITTED FOR ANOTHER REVIEW. |
| | 1. YOU CONTINUE TO SUBMIT GENERIC DRAWINGS. AS PER FAC |
| | 61G15-23.002, A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL SIGN AND |
| | SEAL ALL PLANS. EACH SHEET SHALL HAVE A TITLE BLOCK |
| | CONTAINING THE NAME ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE |
| | ENGINEER. EACH TITLE BLOCK, AT A MINIMUM SHALL CONTAIN |
| | AMONG OTHER CRITERIA THE NAME AND IDENTIFICATION OF THE |
| | PROJECT AND THE DATE PREPARED. |
| | 2. WHAT YOU HAVE PROVIDED IS NOT A RISER DIAGRAM. THAT |
| | MAY HELP THE BLDG. PLANS EXAMINER LOCATE THE VARIOUS |
| | PANELS ON THE ROOF. |
| | 3. THE FACT THAT I COMMITTED A TYPO DOES NOT ELIMINATE |
| | THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BACKFED BREAKERS TO BE LISTED |
| | FOR THE APPLICATION. THE PV SUB-PANEL HAS NOTHING TO DO |
| | WITH THE BACKFED BREAKER. THAT IS FOR THE PROTECTION OF |
| | ANY PERSON SERVICING THE UNIT ALONG WITH ITS RATING. |
| | 4. REGARDLESS OF COMPLIANCE LISTED STATED I DO NOT SEE |
| | A UL LISTING ON THE DEVICE NOR DOES IT SPECIFICALLY |
| | STATE THAT IT IS IN FACT AN INTER-ACTIVE UNIT. HAD THIS |
| | DEVICE BEEN TESTED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE UL |
| | STANDARDS, IT WOULD PROUDLY DISPLAY THE UL STICKER. |
| | 5. WHEN YOU SUBMIT THE PROPER AND CORRECTED DRAWINGS, |
| | YOU MAY WANT TO REMOVE THE WORD ROMEX AND EDIT NOTE 10 |
| | ALTOGETHER. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, ADDITIONALLY, INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PAGES INTO TO SUBMITTAL AND LEAVE THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. |
| | |
